Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/10137
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Viviane Horta
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T18:57:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-21T18:57:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-21
dc.identifier.citationGOMES, Viviane Horta. Nalbufina, butorfanol e morfina no controle da dor pós-operatória imediata em cadelas submetidas a ovariohisterectomia eletiva. 2018. 51 f. Tese (Mestrado em Medicina Veterinária) - Instituto de Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina e Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, 2018.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/10137-
dc.description.abstractOs opioides são utilizados no manejo da dor perioperatória, formando a base do plano analgésico balanceado. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia analgésica da nalbufina, butorfanol e morfina no pós-operatório imediato, em cadelas submetidas a ovariohisterectomia eletiva. Quarenta e oito cadelas hígidas de diferentes raças foram distribuídas de forma aleatória em quatro tratamentos: nalbufina 0,5 mg kg-1(N0.5) e 1,0 mg kg-1 (N1.0), butorfanol 0,4 mg kg-1(B0.4) ou morfina 0,2 mg kg-1(M0.2) associados à acepromazina 0,02 mg kg-1 , por via intravenosa (IV). A anestesia foi induzida com propofol e mantida com isofluorano. A Escala Analógica Visual Dinâmica e Interativa (DIVAS, 0–100 mm), fases I (DIVAS I), II (DIVAS II) e III (DIVAS III), e a Escala de Dor Composta de Glasgow Modificada (GCMPS, 0–10) foram utilizadas para avaliar a dor antes da administração dos fármacos (BL), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 e 6 horas após a extubação. O resgateanalgésico (0,2 mg kg-1 IV de morfina combinada a 0,2 mg kg-1 IV de meloxicam) foi administrado se o cão apresentasse DIVAS > 70 mm ou GCMPS > 3,5. B0.4 apresentou maior escore em DIVAS II comparado ao N1.0, nas horas 2 (p = 0,038) e 3 (p = 0,002), e ao N0.5, na hora 3 (p = 0,003). Não houve diferença em DIVAS I, III e GCMPS entre os tratamentos. Trinta e quatro cadelas necessitaram de resgate analgésico. Não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação a número de resgates analgésicos (p = 0,813) e a dose total de morfina administrada como resgate (p = 0,763). A administração preemptiva de nalbufina, butorfanol e morfina promove similar analgesia pós-operatória com grande possibilidade de resgate analgésico nas 6 primeiras horas, dessa forma, nesse período devem ser realizadas avaliações regulares e interativas para garantir analgesia adequada às cadelas submetidas a ovariohisterectomia.por
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.subjectAnalgesiapor
dc.subjectAgonista-antagonistapor
dc.subjectCãopor
dc.subjectEscala de dorpor
dc.subjectOpioidepor
dc.subjectAnalgesiaeng
dc.subjectAgonist-antagonisteng
dc.subjectDogeng
dc.subjectOpioideng
dc.subjectPain scaleeng
dc.titleNalbufina, butorfanol e morfina no controle da dor pós-operatória imediata em cadelas submetidas a ovariohisterectomia eletivapor
dc.title.alternativeNalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine for the control of early postoperative pain in canine elective ovariohysterectomyeng
dc.typeTesepor
dc.description.abstractOtherThe management of perioperative pain can be performed by opioids, drugs that form the base of a balanced analgesic plane. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine in the early postoperative analgesia, in bitches submitted to ovariohysterectomy. Forty-eight healthy bitches of different breeds were randomly assigned to four treatments: nalbuphine 0,5 mg kg-1 (N0.5) and 1,0 mg kg-1(N1.0), butorphanol 0,4 mg kg-1(B0.4) or morphine 0,2 mg kg-1 (M0.2), combined with acepromazine 0,02 mg kg-1intravenously. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. Dynamic Interactive Visual Analog Scale (DIVAS, 0–100 mm), phases I (DIVAS I), II (DIVAS II) and III (DIVAS III), and the Modified Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (GCMPS, 0–10) were used to used to assess pain prior administration of the drugs (BL), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hours after extubation. The analgesic rescue (0,2 mg kg1IV of morphine combined with 0,2 mg kg-1IV of meloxicam) was given if the dog had DIVAS > 70 mm or GCMPS > 3,5. B0.4 had a higher DIVAS II score compared with N1.0, at 2 (p = 0,038) and 3 hours (p = 0,002), and with N0.5 at 3 hours (p = 0,003). There was no difference in DIVAS I, III and GCMPS scores between treatments. Rescue analgesia was required in thirty-four bitches. The number of analgesic rescues (p = 0,813) and total dose of morphine given as rescue (p = 0,763) were not different between groups. Preemptive administration of nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine produce similar postoperative analgesia with great possibility of analgesic rescue in the first 6 hours, therefore, over this period, regular and interactive evaluations should be performed to ensure adequate analgesia in bitches submitted to ovariohysterectomy.eng
dc.contributor.advisor1Silva, Marta Fernanda Albuquerque da
dc.contributor.advisor1ID0544591266946007por
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0544591266946007por
dc.contributor.referee1Paiva, Jonimar Pereira
dc.contributor.referee1ID0555358847663175por
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0555358847663175por
dc.contributor.referee2Abreu, Mariana Boechat de
dc.contributor.referee2ID0171700191037164por
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0171700191037164por
dc.contributor.referee3Moreno, Juan Carlos Duque
dc.contributor.referee3ID8509640024284103por
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8509640024284103por
dc.contributor.referee4Santos, Paulo Sergio Patto dos
dc.contributor.referee4ID5331938962896664por
dc.contributor.referee4Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5331938962896664por
dc.creator.ID8842502819385308por
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8842502819385308por
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpor
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Veterináriapor
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpor
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária (Patologia e Ciências Clínicas)por
dc.relation.referencesAUBRUN, F.; SALVI, N.; CORIAT, P.; RIOU, B. Sex- and age-related differences in morphine requirements for postoperative pain relief. Anesthesiology, v. 103, p. 156–160, 2005. ANIL, S.; ANIL, L.; DEEN, J. Challenges of pain assessment in domestic animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, v. 220, p. 313–319, 2002. BERRY, S. H. Analgesia in the Perioperative Period. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 45, p. 1013–1027, 2015. BONNET, F.; MARRET, E. Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, v. 95, p. 52–58, 2005. CAMARGO, J. B.; STEAGALL, P. V. M.; MINTO, B. W. Post-operative analgesic effects of butorphanol or firocoxib administered to dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 38, p. 252–259, 2011. CAULKETT, N.; READ, M.; FOWLER, D. A comparison of the analgesic effects of butorphanol with those of meloxicam after elective ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Canadian Veterinary Journal, v. 44, p. 565–570, 2003. COETZEE, J. F.; LECHTENBERG, K. F.; STOCK, M. L.; KUKANICH, B.Pharmacokinetics and effect of intravenous nalbuphine in weaned Holstein calves aftersurgical castration. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, v. 37, p. 169–177, 2014. CORTOPASSI, S. G.; FANTONI, D. T. Medicação pré-anestésica. In: Anestesia em cães e gatos. São Paulo: Rocca. v. 1, 2. ed, p. 217–227, 2009. DZIKITI, T. B.; JOUBERT, K. E.; VENTER, L. J.; DZIKITI, L. N. Comparison of morphine and carprofen administered alone or in combination for analgesia in dogs undergoing 28 ovariohysterectomy. Journal of South African Veterinary Association, v. 77, p. 120–126, 2006. EPSTEIN, M.; RODAN, I.; GRIFFENHAGEN, G.; KADRLIK, J.; PETTY, M.; ROBERTSON, S.; SIMPSON, W. 2015 AAHA/AAFP Pain Management Guidelines for Dogs and Cats. Journal of the American Hospital Association, v. 51, p. 67–84, 2015. FENG, Y.; HE, X.; YANG, Y. Current research on opioid receptor function. Current Drug Targets, v. 13, p. 230–246, 2012. FLECKNELL, P. A.; LILES, J. H. Assessment of the analgesic action of opioid agonist antagonists in the rabbit. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 17, p. 24 –29, 1990. FRAZÍLIO. O.; ROSSI, R.; JARDIM, P. H. A. Effects of epidural nalbuphine on intraoperative isoflurane and postoperative analgesic requirements in dogs. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, v. 29, p. 38–46, 2014. GAYNOR, J. S.; MUIR, W. W. I. Acute pain management: a case-based approach. In: Handbook of Veterinary Pain Management. Elsevier, USA, 3. edn, p. 444–446, 2014. GEAR, R. W.; MIASKOWSKI, C.; GORDON, N. C.; PAUL, S. M.; HELLER, P. H.; LEVINE, J. D. Kappa-opioids produce significantly greater analgesia in women than in men. Nature Medicine, v. 2, p. 1248–1250, 1996. GOMES, V. H.; MONTEIRO, E. R.; DIAS, R. S.; OLIVEIRA, R.L.; SILVA, M. F.A.; COELHO, K. Comparison of the sedative effects of morphine, meperidine or fentanyl, in combination with acepromazine, in dogs. Ciência Rural, v. 41, p. 1411–1416, 2011. GOMES, V. H.; OLIVEIRA, R. L.; MARQUES, J. L.; COELHO, C. M.; SILVA, M. F.Comparison of the sedative effects of nalbuphine and butorphanol, alone or in combination with acepromazine in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 45, p. 68–72, 2018. GRIMM, K. A.; TRANQUILLI, W. J.; THURMON, J. C.; BENSON, G. J. Duration of nonresponse to noxious stimulation after intramuscular administration of butorphanol, 29 medetomidine, or a butorphanol-medetomidine combination during isoflurane administration in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 61, p. 42–47, 2000. HALL, L.W. et al. Principles of sedation, analgesia and premedication. In: HALL, L.W. et al. Veterinary Anaesthesia. London: Saunders, cap.4, p.75-112, 2001. HANSEN, B. D. Assessment of pain in dogs: veterinary clinical studies. ILAR Journal, v. 44, p. 197–205, 2003. HANSEN, B. D. Analgesia and sedation in the critically ill. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, v. 15, p. 285–294, 2005. HELLYER, P. W.; ROBERTSON, S. A.; FAILS, A. D. Pain and its management. In: Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia (4th edn). Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA (eds). Blackwell Publishing, Ames, USA. p. 31–57, 2007.HENDRIX, P. K.; ERA, M. R.; ROBINSON, E. P. Epidural administration of bupivacaine, morphine, or their combination for postoperative analgesia in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, v. 209, p. 598–607, 1996. HEWSON, C. J.; DOHOO, I. R.; LEMKE, K. A. Perioperative use of analgesics in dogs and cats by Canadian veterinarians in 2001. Canadian Veterinary Journal, v. 47, p. 352–359, 2006. HÖGLUND, O. V.; OLSSON, K.; HAGMAN, R. Comparison of haemodynamic changes during two surgical methods for neutering female dogs. Research in Veterinary Science, v.91, p. 159–163, 2011. HOLTON, L.; SCOTT, E.; NOLAN, A.; REID, J.; WELSH, E.; FLAHERTY, D. Comparison of three methods used for assessment of pain in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, v. 212, p. 61–66, 1998. HOUGHTON, K. J.; RECH, R. H.; SAWYER, D. C.; DURHAM, R. A.; ADAMS, T.;LANGHAM, M. A.; STRILER, E. L.. Dose response of intravenous butorphanol to increase 30 visceral nociceptive threshold in dogs. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, v. 197, p. 290–296, 1991. HÖGLUND, O. V.; LÖVEBRANT, J.; OLSSON, U.; HÖGLUND, K. Blood pressure and heart rate during ovariohysterectomy in pyometra and control dogs: a preliminary investigation. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, v. 58, p. 1–7, 2016. INOUE, T.; KO, J. C.; MANDSAGER, R. E.; PAYTON, M. E.; GALLOWAY, D. S.; LANGE, D. N. Efficacy and safety of preoperative etodolac and butorphanol administration in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Journal of the American Hospital Association, v. 42, p. 178–188, 2006. KUKANICH, B.; WIESE, A. J.; Opioids. In: Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Wiley Blackwell, USA, 5 edn, p. 207–226, 2015. LASCELLES, B. D.; CRIPPS, P. J.; JONES, A. Post-operative central hypersensitivity and pain: the pre-emptive value of pethidine for ovariohysterectomy. Pain, v. 73, p. 461–471, 1997. LASCELLES, B. D.; CRIPPS, P. J.; JONES, A.; WATERMAN-PEARSON, A. E. Efficacy and kinetics of carprofen, administered preoperatively or postoperatively, for the prevention of pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Surgery, v. 27, p. 568–582, 1998. MEGAN, MARQUEZ.; PEDRO, BOSCAN.; HEATHER, WEIR.; PAMELA, VOGEL.; DAVID, C. TWEDT. Comparison of NK-1 Receptor Antagonist (Maropitant) to Morphine as a Pre-Anaesthetic Agent for Canine Ovariohysterectomy. PLoS One, v. 10, 2015. MASTROCINQUE, S.; FANTONI, D.T. A comparison of preoperative tramadol and morphine for the control of early postoperative pain in canine ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 30, p. 220–228, 2003.31 MATHEW, P. & MATHEW, J. Assessment and management of pain in infants. Postgraduate Medical Journal, v. 79, p. 438–443, 2003.MATHEWS, K. A.; PALEY, D. M.; FOSTER, R.; VALLIANT, A. E.; YOUNG, S. S. A comparison of ketorolac with flunixin, butorphanol, and oxymorphone in controlling postoperative pain in dogs. Canadian Veterinary Journal, v. 37, p. 557–567, 1996. MATHEWS, K. A. Pain assessment and general approach to management. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 30, p. 729–755, 2000. MATHEWS, K. A.; PETTIFER, G.; FOSTER, R.; MCDONELL, W. Safety and efficacy of preoperative administration of meloxicam, compared with that of ketoprofen and butorphanol in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 62, p. 882–888, 2001. MOLINARI, C. E.; BELÁ, M.; GONZÁLEZ, F.; SCHIAFFI, A. El clorhidrato de nalbufina. Su utilizacion en la anestesia general de los caninos. Veterinaria Argentina, v. 7, n. 67, p. 456– 463, 1990. MONTEIRO, E. R.; RODRIGUES, A. J.; ASSIS, H. M.; CAMPAGNOL, D.; QUITZAN, J. G. Comparative study on the sedative effects of morphine, methadone, butorphanol or tramadol, in combination with acepromazine in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 36, p. 25–33, 2009. MORGAZ, J.; NAVARRETE, R.; MUÑOZ-RASCÓN, P. Postoperative analgesic effects of dexketoprofen, buprenorphine and tramadol in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Research in Veterinary Science, v. 95, p. 278–282, 2013. MOSS, J.; ROSOW, C. E. Histamine release by narcotics and muscle relaxants in humans.Anesthesiology, v. 59, p. 330–339, 1983. MURPHY, M. R.; HUG, C. C. The enflurane sparing effect of morphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine. Anesthesiology, v. 57, p. 489–92, 1982.32 MURRELL, J. C.; PSATHA, E. P.; SCOTT, E. M. Application of a modified form of the Glasgow pain scale in a veterinary teaching centre in the Netherlands. Veterinary Journal, v. 162, p. 403– 408, 2008. ONG, C. K.; LIRK, P.; SEYMOUR, R. A.; JENKINS, B. J. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia, v. 100, p. 757–773, 2005. OTERO, P. E. Drogas Analgésicas. In: Dor Avaliação e Tratamento em Pequenos Animais. São Paulo: InterBook, 1. ed, p. 96–110, 2005.PASCOE, P. J. Perioperative pain management. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 30, p. 917–932, 2000. REID, J.; NOLAN, A. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic and sedative effects of flunixin and papaveretum in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Pratice, v. 32, p. 603–608, 1993. ROMAGNOLI, A.; KEATS, A. S. Ceiling effect for respiratory depression by nalbuphine. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, v. 27, p. 478–85, 1980. SANCHEZ-MIGALLON GUZMAN, D.; KUKANICH, B.; KEULER, N.S.; KLAUER, J. M.; PAUL-MURPHY, J. R. Antinociceptive effects of nalbuphine hydrochloride in Hispaniolan Amazon parrots (Amazona ventralis). American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 72, p. 736–740, 2011. SAWYER, D. C.; RECH, R. H.; DURHAM, R. A. Dose response to butorphanol administered subcutaneously to increase visceral nociceptive threshold in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 52, p. 1826–1830, 1991. SHIH, A. C.; ROBERTSON, S.; ISAZA, N.; PABLO, L.; DAVIES, W. Comparison between analgesic effects of buprenorphine, carprofen, and buprenorphine with carprofen for canine ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 35, p. 69–79, 2008.33 SLINGSBY, L. S.; TAYLOR, P. M.; MURRELL, J. C. A study to evaluate buprenorphine at 40 μg kg−1compared to 20 μg kg−1as a post-operative analgesic in the dog. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 38, p. 584–593, 2011. STONE, E. A. Ovary and uterus. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, Elsevier Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3edn, p. 1487–1502, 2003. TAYLOR, P.; HOULTON, J. Postoperative analgesia in the dog: a comparison of morphine, buprenorphine and pentazocine. Journal of Small Animal Pratice, v. 25, p. 145–153, 1983. TAYLOR, P. M.; HOULTON, J. E. F. Postoperative analgesia in the dog: a comparison of morphine, buprenorphine and pentazocine. Journal of Small Animal Pratice, v. 25, p. 437–451, 1984. TAYLOR, P.; HERRTAGE, M. Evaluation of some drug combinations for sedation in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Pratice, v. 27, p. 325–333, 1986. TALLANT, A.; AMBROS, B.; FREIRE, C.; SAKALS, S. Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative pain during canine ovariohysterectomy and ovariectomy. Canadian Veterinary Journal, v. 57, p. 741–746, 2016. TEIXEIRA, R. C. R.; MONTEIRO, E. R.; CAMPAGNOL, D.; COELHO, K.; BRESSAN, T. F.; MONTEIRO, B. S. Effects of tramadol alone, in combination with meloxicam or dipyrone, on postoperative pain and the analgesic requirement in dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy with or without ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v.40, p. 641–649, 2013. TRANQUILLI, W.J.; THURMON, J.C.; GRIMM, K.A. Opióides, Anti-inflamatórios não Esteroidais e Analgésicos Adjuvantes. In: Anestesiologia e Analgesia Veterinária. São Paulo: Rocca. 4. ed, p. 270–304, 2013. TSAI, T. Y.; CHANG, S. K.; CHOU, P. Y.; YEH, L. S. Comparison of postoperative effects between lidocaine infusion, meloxicam, and their combination in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 40, p. 615–622, 2013. 34 VALVERDE, A.; CANTWELL, S.; HERNÁNDEZ, J.; BROTHERSON, C. Effects of acepromazine on the incidence of vomiting associated with opioid administration in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 31, p. 40–45, 2004. VAN NIEL, J. C.; SCHNEIDER, J.; TZSCHENTKE, T. M. Efficacy of Full µ-Opioid Receptor Agonists is not Impaired by Concomitant Buprenorphine or Mixed Opioid Agonists/Antagonists - Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Drug Research (Stuttg), v.66, p. 562–570, 2016. VETTORATO, E.; BACCO, S. A comparison of the sedative and analgesic properties of pethidine (meperidine) and butorphanol in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Pratice, v. 52, p. 426–432, 2011. WAGNER, A. E.; WORLAND, G. A.; GLAWE, J. C. Multicenter, randomized controlled trial of pain-related behaviors following routine neutering in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, v. 233, p.109–115, 2008. WATERMAN-PEARSON, A.; KULTHAM, W. Pharmacokinetics of intramuscularlyadministered pethidine in dogs and the influence of anaesthesia and surgery. Veterinary Record, v. 124, p. 293–296, 1988. WELSH, E.; GETTINGBY, G.; NOLAN, A. Comparison of visual analogue scale and a numerical rating scale for assessment of lameness, using sheep as a model. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 54, p. 976–983, 1993. WILSON, D. V.; EVANS, A. T.; MILLER, R. Effects of preanesthetic administration ofmorphine on gastroesophageal reflux and regurgitation during anesthesia in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 66, p. 386–390, 2005. ZANUZZO, F. S.; TEIXEIRA-NETO, F. J.; TEIXEIRA, L. R.; DINIZ, M. S.; SOUZA, V. L.; THOMAZINI, C. M.; STEAGALL, P. V. Analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of dipyrone, meloxicam or a dipyrone-meloxicam combination in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Veterinary Journal, v. 205, p. 33–37, 2015.por
dc.subject.cnpqMedicina Veterináriapor
dc.thumbnail.urlhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/66581/2018%20-%20Viviane%20Horta%20Gomes%20%286%29.pdf.jpg*
dc.originais.urihttps://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/5002
dc.originais.provenanceSubmitted by Leticia Schettini (leticia@ufrrj.br) on 2021-09-01T18:51:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2018 - Viviane Horta Gomes (6).pdf: 835054 bytes, checksum: 73187d3b1797750f7f4e5e4321b23dd5 (MD5)eng
dc.originais.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-09-01T18:51:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2018 - Viviane Horta Gomes (6).pdf: 835054 bytes, checksum: 73187d3b1797750f7f4e5e4321b23dd5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-21eng
Appears in Collections:Doutorado em Medicina Veterinária (Patologia e Ciências Clínicas)

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018 - Viviane Horta Gomes (6).pdf2018 - Viviane Horta Gomes815.48 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.