logo RIMA
logo UFRRJ

  1. Repositório de Múltiplos Acervos da UFRRJ
  2. Teses e Dissertações
  3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal
  4. Mestrado em Biologia Animal
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/10847
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarvalhaes, Jeiel Gabrir
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T01:43:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-22T01:43:41Z-
dc.date.issued2011-06-29
dc.identifier.citationCARVALHAES, Jeiel Gabrir. Variabilidade craniana de três espécies do gênero Thrichomys (Rodentia, Echimyidae), através de técnicas de Morfometria geométrica. 2011. 107 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Biologia Animal) - Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica - RJ, 2011.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/10847-
dc.description.abstractO gênero Thrichomys Trouessart, 1880 (Histricognathi: Echimyidae), apresenta uma grande variação de hábitos alimentares, locomotores e comportamentais. Este gênero possui uma sistemática complexa e apesar de já existirem estudos moleculares e morfológicos sobre o gênero, ainda é difícil identificar e classificar estes indivíduos que possuem uma alta diversificação cariotípica. Tais particularidades os tornam interessantes para testar a relação existente entre estas características e principalmente, a forma do crânio. Para tal, o presente trabalho com o objetivo de diferenciar as espécies Thrichomys apereoides, Thrichomys laurentius e Thrichomys pachyurus, utilizou como ferramenta a morfometria geométrica sob marcos anatômicos cranianos. Foram tomadas imagens dorsais, ventrais e laterais de 204 crânios, nas quais foram estabelecidos pontos de referência homólogos. A partir das coordenadas destes pontos, foi possível eliminar o efeito do tamanho das espécies e 1) testar as diferenças entre espécies, entre animais nascidos em biotério e campo e entre sexos assim como suas interações 2) quantificar as diferenças de forma entre as três espécies 3) descrever as diferenças na forma obtidas entre os diferentes grupos testados. Os resultados revelaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre a forma do crânio das diferentes espécies assim como entre animais criados em biotério e animais de campo. Também foi detectado dimorfismo sexual na forma. O tamanho não foi significativamente diferente entre nenhum dos fatores analisados. As principais diferenças de forma entre as espécies se localizaram na região parietal e parieto-frontal, nos arcos zygomáticos e na inserção do incisivo. As diferenças de forma entre animais de biotério e de campo se localizaram principalmente na parte posterior do arco zygomático. Os indivíduos de Caetité, BA, são morfologicamente diferentes de outras populações de T. laurentius indicando uma possível dissociação entre evolução morfológica e cariotípica.por
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq, Brasilpor
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.subjectEchimyidaepor
dc.subjectbiometriapor
dc.subjectmorfometriapor
dc.subjectanatomiapor
dc.subjectestatísticapor
dc.subjectEchimyidaeeng
dc.subjectbiometriceng
dc.subjectmorphometricseng
dc.subjectanatomyeng
dc.subjectstatisticseng
dc.titleVariabilidade craniana de três espécies do gênero Thrichomys (Rodentia, Echimyidae), através de técnicas de Morfometria geométricapor
dc.title.alternativeSkull variability of three species of the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia, Echimyidae), through techniques of geometric morphometryeng
dc.typeDissertaçãopor
dc.description.abstractOtherThe genus Thrichomys Trouessart, 1880 (Histricognathi: Echimyidae), shows a wide variation in dietary, locomotor and behavioral habits. This genus has a complex systematic history. Although morphological and molecular studies on the genus are available, it is still difficult to identify and classify these individuals who have a high karyotypic diversification. Such peculiarities make them interesting to test the relationship between these characteristics and skull variation. In order to differentiate the species Thrichomys apereoides, Thrichomys laurentius and Thrichomys pachyurus we used geometric morphometrics on skull landmarks. Pictures were taken dorsal, ventral and lateral sides of 204 skulls, in which homologous reference points were established. From the coordinates of these points, it was possible to eliminate the effect of size of the species and to 1) test the differences among species and between animals born and raised in the lab and field animals as well as between sexes and the interaction between these factors 2) quantify shape differences among species 3) to describe differences obtained among the groups tested. The results revealed statistically significant differences in shape among species, between sexes and between laboratory and field animals. Size was not significantly different between any of the factors analyzed. Major shape differences were located in the parietal and parieto-frontal region, in the zygomatic arches e in the incisive region. Differences in skull shape between laboratory and field animals involve the posterior portion of the zygomatic arches. The individual fo Caetité, BA, are morphologically different from other T. laurentius populations indicating a possible dissociation between morphological and karyotypical evolution.eng
dc.contributor.advisor1Rocha-Barbosa, Oscar
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6551622738384590por
dc.contributor.referee1Pessôa, Leila Maria
dc.contributor.referee2Loguercio, Mariana Fiuza de Castro
dc.creator.ID086576357-71por
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1432919639365461por
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpor
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúdepor
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpor
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animalpor
dc.relation.referencesALBERCH, P. 1980. Ontogenesis and morphological diversification. American Zoologist 20: 653-667. ALHO, C. J. R.; PEREIRA, L. A. & PAULA, A. C. 1986. Patterns of habitat utilization by small mammals populations in Cerrado Biome of Central Brazil. Mammalia, 50: 447-460. AMARILLO-SUAREZ, A. R. FOX & Fox, C. W. 2006. Population differences in host use by a seed beetle: local adaptation, phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects. Oecologia 150, 247–258. ASTÚA, D. M. 1998. Análise morfométrica do crânio e da mandíbula de marsupiais Didelfídeos: implicações ecológicas e funcionais. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade federal de Minas gerais, xxiv, 154p. BAKER, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 1–24. BANDOUK, A. C. & REIS, S. F. 1995. Craniometric variation and subspecific differentiation in Thrichomys apereoides in northeastern Brazil (Rodentia: Echimyidae). International Journal of Mammalogy Biology, 60: 176-185. BASILE, P. A. 2003. Taxonomia de Thrichomys Trouessart, 1880 (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Dissertação de Mestrado, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, xvi + 158p. BONVICINO, C. R.; OTAZU, I. B. & D’ANDREA, P. S. 2002. Karyologic evidence of diversification of the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Cytogenet Genome Research, 97: 200-204. BONVICINO, C. R. & D’ANDREA, P. S. 2006. Reproductive isolation due to the genetic incompatibilities between Thrichomys pachyurus and two subspecies of Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Genome, 49: 159 - 167. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1990. Introduction to methods for landmark data. In: ROHLF, F. J., BOOKSTEIN, F. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Wokshop, vol. 2. University. Michigan Museum Zoology Spec. Pub., pp. 215 – 226. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 58:313–365. BORODIN, P. M.; BARREIROS-GÓMEZ, S. C.; ZHELEZOVA, A. I.; BONVICINO, C. R. & D’ANDREA, P. S. Reproductive isolation due to the genetic incompatibilities between Thrichomys pachyurus and two subspecies of Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Genome, 49: 159 - 167. 2006. BRADSHAW, A. D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13, 115–155. BRAGGIO, E. & BONVICINO, C. R. 2004. Molecular divergence in the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia: Echimyidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 85 (2): 7-11. BRANDT, J. F. 1855. Beitrage zur nahern Kenntniss der Säugethiere Russland's. Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Saint Petersburg, Mémoires Mathématiques, Physiques et Naturelles, 7:1-365. CARDINI, A. & O’HIGGINS, P. 2005. Post-natal ontogeny of the mandible and ventral cranium in Marmota species (Rodentia, Sciuridae): allometry and phylogeny. Zoomorphology 124: 189–203. CARDOSO, G. L. & C. LOMÔNACO, C. 2003. Variações fenotípicas em Eugenia calycina. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, V.26, n.1, p. 131-140. CARVALHO G. A. S. & SALLES L. O. 2004. Relationships among extant and fossil echimyids (Rodentia: Hystricognathi). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society: 142, 445– 477. CHEVERUD, J. M. 1996. Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. American Zoologist, v. 36, n. 1, p. 44-50. CHEVERUD, J. M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36(3): 499-516. CRAIG, J. K. & FOOTE, C. J. 2001. Countergradient variation and secondary sexual color: phenotypic convergence promotes genetic divergence in carotenoid use between sympatric anadromous and nonanadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Evolution 55, 380–391. CRAIG, J. K.; FOOTE, C. J. & WOOD, C. C. 2005. Countergradient variation in carotenoid use between sympatric morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) exposes nonanadromous hybrids in the wild by their mismatched spawning colour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84, 287–305. D’ANATRO, A. & LESSA, E. P. 2006. Geometric morphometric analysis of geographic variation in the Rıo Negro tuco-tuco, Ctenomys rionegrensis(Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Mammalian biology 71, 288–298. D’ANDREA, P. S.; ROQUE, A. L. R.; TEIXEIRA, B. R. 2002a. Alternativas para animais de laboratório: uso de animais não convencionais – Roedores Silvestres. In: Animais de laboratório – criação e experimentação (Andrade, A.; Pinto, S. C.; Oliveira, R.S.; orgs.). Editora FioCruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Pg. 353 – 360. DE JONG, G. & BEHERA, N. 2002 The influence of life-history differences on the evolution of reaction norms. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4, 1–25. DEWITT, T. J.; SIH, A.; WILSON, D. S. 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 77-81. DIAZ, I. D. P. S. 2009. Interação genótipo – ambiente no peso ao sobreano na raça Nelore. Dissertação de Mestrado, - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP. xiii, 58p. DUARTE, L. C., L. R. MONTEIRO, F. J. VON ZUBEN, AND S. F. DOS REIS. 2000. Variation in mandible shape in Thrichomys apereoides (Mammalia: Rodentia): geometric analysis of a complex morphological structure. Systematic Biology 49:563–578. DRAKE, A. G. & KLINGENBERG, C. P. 2008 The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St. Bernard dogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, London, 275: 71-76. DUDLEY, S. A. & SCHMITT, J. 1996. Testing adaptive plasticity hypothesis: densitydependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 147: 445-465. DUMONT, E. R. 1997. Cranial shape in fruit, nectar, and exsudate feeders: implications for interpreting the fossil record. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 102: 187-202. EISENBERG, J. F. & REDFORD, K. H. 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. 3th Edition. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 550pp. EISENBERG, J. F. & REDFORD, K. H. 1999. Mammals of the neotropics the central neotropics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Vol.3, pp. 93-94. ELLERMANN, J. R. (1940). The families and genera of living rodents with a list of nomed forms. I. Rodents other than Muridae. British Museum (Natural History) Publications, 2, 1– 690. EMMONS, L. H. & FEER, F. 1997. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a Field Guide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2ª ed. ERNANDE, B. & DIECKMANN,, U. 2004. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 613–628. FALCONER. D. S. & MACKAY, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4. Ed. Edinburgh: Longman Group Limited, 464p. FALCONER, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longnam Science & Technology, New York. FELDHAMER, G.; DRICKAMER, L.; VESSEY, S. & MERRITT, J. 1999. Mammalogy: Adaptation, Diversity, and Ecology. McGraw Hill. Boston. 576pp. FERNANDES, F. A.; FORNEL, R.; CORDEIRO-ESTRELA, P. & FREITAS, T. R. 2009. Intra- and interspecific skull variation in two sister species of the subterranean rodent genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae): coupling geometric morphometrics and chromosomal polymorphism. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 155, 220–237. FLYNN, J. J. & WYSS, A. R. 1998. Recent advances in South American mammalian paleontology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13: 449-454. FLYNN, J. J. & WYSS A. R.1999. New marsupials from the Eocene–Oligocene transition of the Andean main range, Chile. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19(3):533–549. FRAILEY, C. D. & CAMPBELL, K. E. J. 2004. Paleogene Rodents from Amazonian Peru: The Santa Rosa Local Fauna. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science series, Number 40, pp. 71-130. FUTUYMA, D. J. 1996. Biologia evolutiva. 2.ed.Riberão Preto: Sociedade Brasileira de genética - SBG, 646 p. FUZETO, A. P. & LOMÔNACO, C. 2000. Potencial plástico de Cabralea canjerana subsp. polytricha (Adr. Juss.) Penn. (Meliaceae) e seu papel na formação de ecótipos em área de cerrado e vereda, Uberlândia, MG. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 23: 169-176. GALEWSKI, T.: MAUVREYA J.; LEITE Y. L. R.; PATTON, J. L. & DOUZERY, E. J. P. 2005. Ecomorphological diversiWcation among South American spiny rats (Rodentia; Echimyidae): a phylogenetic and chronological approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution: 34, 601–615. GAY, S. W. & BEST, T. L. 1996. Relationships between abiotic variables and geographic variation in the skulls of pumas (Puma concolor: Mammalia, Felidae) in North and South America. Zoological Journal Linnean Society, 117: 259-282. GOMULKIEWICZ, R. & KIRKPATRICK, M. 1992. Quantitative genetics and evolution of reaction norms. Evolution 46: 396-411. GONZALEZ, P. N.; HALLGRÍMSSON, B. & OYHENART, E. E. 2011. Developmental plasticity in covariance structure of the skull: effects of prenatal stress. Journal of Anatomy 218, pp 243–257. GONZÁLEZ, S.; ÁLVAREZ-VALIN F. & MALDONADO J. E. 2002. Morphometric differentiation of endangered pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus), with description of new subspecies from Uruguay. Journal of Mammalogy: Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 1127-1140. GOULD, S. J. & LEWONTIN, R. C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - B 205: 581-598. GOULD, S. l. & JOHNSTON R. F. 1972. Geographic variation. Annual Revist Ecology Systematics 3: 457-498. HAIR, J.; ANDERSON, R.; TATHAM, R. & BLACK, W. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5. Ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall. HERRERA, H. M.; DÁVILA, A. M. R.; NOREK, A.; ABREU, U. G.; SOUZA, S. S.; D’ANDREA, P. S.; JANSEN, A. M. 2004a. Trypanosoma evansi Enzootiology in Pantanal, Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology, 125: 263-275. HERRERA, L., XAVIER, S. C.; VIEGAS, C.; MARTINEZ, C.; COTIAS, P. M.; CARRASCO, H.; URDANETA-MORALES, S.; JANSEN, A. M. 2004b. Trypanosoma cruzi in a caviomorph rodent: parasitological and pathological features of the experimental infection of Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia, Echimyiodae). Experimental Parasitology, 107: 78-88. HERRERA L, D’ANDREA PS, XAVIER SCC, MANGIA RH, FERNANDES O, JANSEN A. M. 2005. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in wild mammals of the National Park “Serra da Capivara”, and its surroundings (Piauí, Brazil), endemic for Chagas disease. Royal Society of Tropical Medicine Hygiene, 99: 379-388. HEYWOOD, V. H. 1970. Taxonomia Vegetal. Editora Nacional/EPU, São Paulo. JANSEN, A. M.; MADEIRA, M. F.; CARREIRA, J. C. A. & DEANE, M. P. 1997. Trypanosoma cruzi in the opossum Didelphis marsupialis”: a study on the correlations and kinetics of the systemic and scent glands infection in naturally and experimentally infected animals”. Experimental Parasitology, 86: 37-44. KAY, R. F.; MACFADDEN, B. J.; MADDEN, R. H.; SANDERMAN H. & ANAYA F. 1998. Revised age of the Salla beds, Bolivia, and its bearing on the age of the Deseadan South American Land Mammal ‘‘Age.’’ Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18(1):189–199. LARA, M. C., PATTON, J. L., DA SILVA, M. N. F., 1996. The simultaneous diversication of south american Echimyid rodents (Hystricognathi) based on complete cytochrome b sequences. Molecular Phylogenetic Evolution 5, 403–413. LAVOCAT, R. 1974 Interrelationships between African and South American rodents and their bearing on problem of origin of South American monkeys. Journal Humam Evolution, 3(4): 323-326. LAUDER, G. V.; CROMPTON, A. W.; GANS, C.; HANKEN, J.; LIEM, K. F.; MAIER, W. O.; MEYER, A.; PRESLEY, R.; RIEPPEL, R.; ROTH, G.; SCHLUTER, D. & ZWEERS, G. A. 1989. Group Report - How are feeding systems integrated and how have evolutionary innovations been introduced. In: Complex organismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates. (Eds: Wake, D. B. & Roth, G.) John Wiley & Sons, pp. 97-113. LEAL-MESQUITA, E. R. 1991. Estudos citogenéticos em dez espécies de roedores brasileiros da família Echimyidae. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. LEGEY, A. P.; PINHO, A. P.; XAVIER, S. C. C.; LEON, L.; JANSEN, A. M. 1999. Humoral Immune response kinetics in Philander opossum and Didelphis marsupialis infected and immunized by Trypanosoma cruzi. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 94 (3): 371-373. LEITE, Y. L. R. & Patton, J. L. 2002. Evolution of South american spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae): the star-phylogeny hypothesys revisited. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (3): 455-464. LEVINS, R. 1968. Evolution in Changing in Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton. LEWONTIN, R. C. 1974. Analysis of variance and analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26 (3): 400 – 411. LIMA, J. F. S. 2000. Diversidade Cariológica de roedores de pequeno porte do estado do Tocantins, Brasil. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Rio Claro, São Paulo. LIVELY, C. M. 1986. Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially-variable environment. American Naturalist 128, 561–572. LOWE, V. P. W. & GARDINER, A. S. 1974. A re-examination of the subspecies of Red deer (Cervus elaphus) with particular reference to the stocks in Britain. Journal of Zoology, 174: 185-201. MACKENZIE, A. & GULDEMOND, J. A. 1994. Sympatric speciation in aphids. II. Host race formation in the face of gene flow. In Individuals, populations and patterns in Ecology (S. R. Leather, A. D. Wait, N. I. Mills & K. F. A. Walters, eds.). Intercept Ltda, Andover, p. 379-196. MALDONADO, Jr., A; MACHADO E SILVA, J. R.; RODRIGUES E SILVA, R.; LENZI, H. L. & REY, L. 1994. Evaluation of the resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection in Nectomys squamipes (Rodentia: Cricetidae), a natural host of infection in Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, 36 (3): 193-198. MARCUS, L. F.; HINGST-ZAHER, E. & ZAHER, H. 1998. Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Abstracts, Euro- American Mammal Congress, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, July 19-24. P. 73. MARES, M. A.; WILLIG, M. R.; STREILEN, K. E. & LACHER Jr., T. E. 1981. The mammals of northeastern Brazil: a preliminary assessment. Annual Carnegie Museum 50: 81- 137. MAYNARD-SMITH, J.; BURIAN, R.; KAUFFMAN, S.; ALBERCH, P.; CAMPBELL, J.; GOODWIN, B.; LANDE, R.; RAUP, D. & WOLPERT, L. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. The Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265-287. MCDONALD, D. 1984. Encyclopedia of Mammals. Facts on File Publications. New York. 895pp. MCKENNA, M. C. & BELL, S.K. 1997. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York.: i-xii, 1-631. MIDDLETON, K. M.; KELLY, S. A. & GARLAND, T. J. 2008. Selective breeding as a tool to probe skeletal response to high voluntary locomotor activity in mice. Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 48, number 3, pp. 394–410. MONTEIRO, L. R.; DI BENEDITTO, A. P. M.; GUILHERMO, L. H.; RIVERA, L. A. 2009 Allometric changes and shape differentiation of sagitta otolithis in sciaenid fishes. Fisheries Research, London, 74: 288-299. Variação geográfica na forma e nas relações alométricas... B. Instituto de Pesca, São Paulo, 35(3): 475 – 485. MONTEIRO, L. R., LESSA, L. G. & ABE, A. S. 1999. Ontogenetic variation in skull shape of Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia: Echimyidae). Journal of Mammalogy 80:102–111. MONTEIRO, L. R. & S. F. REIS. 1999. Princípios de Morfometria Geométrica. Ribeirão Preto, Holos Editora Ltda, X+188p. MOOJEN, J. 1952. Os roedores do Brasil. Instituto Nacional do Livro. Rio de Janeiro. 23pp. MOORE, W. J. 1981. The mammalian skull. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. 343pp. MORAN, N. 1992. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. American Naturalist 139, 971–989. NAGORSEN, D. W. 1985. A morphometric study of geographical variation in the Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 567-579. NEFF, N. & MARCUS, L. F. 1980. A survey of multivariate methods for systematics. American Society of Mammalogy. NEVES, A. C. da S. A. & PESSÔA, L. M. 2011. Morphological distinction of species of Thrichomys (Rodentia: Echimyidae) through ontogeny of cranial and dental characters. Zootaxa 2804: 15-24. NICOLA, P. A.; MONTEIRO, L. R.; PÊSSOA, L. M.; VON ZUBEN, F. J.; ROHLF, F. J. & REIS, S. F. 2003. Congruence of hierarchical, localized variation in cranial shape and molecular phylogenetic structure in spiny rats, genus Trinomys (Rodentia: Echimyidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80, 385–396. NOWAK, R. M. & PARADISO, J. L. 1983. Walker's mammals of the world. Vol I. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press. 642pp. NOWAK, R. M. 1999. Walker´s mammals of the world. John Hopkins University Press. Baltimore and London. OLIVEIRA, D. F. 2007. Desenvolvimento ponderal e biometria corporal de caprinos da raça anglonubiana criados em sistema semi-intensivo. Dissertação de Mestrado, Programa de Pós- Graduação em Zootecnia. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia – UESB, 56p. OLIVEIRA, R. C., ROZENTAL, T., ALVES-CORREA, A. A., D’ANDREA, P. S., SCHATZMAYR, H. G., CERQUEIRA, R., LEMOS, E. R. S. 2004. Study of hantavirus infection in captive breed colonies of wild rodents. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 99 (6): 575-576. OLSON, E. & MILLER, R. 1958. Morphologycal Integration. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. PATTERSON, B. & WOOD, A. E. 1982. Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 149:371-543. PESSÔA, L. M.; CORRÊA, M. M. O.; OLIVEIRA, J. A.; LOPES, M. O. G. 2004. Karyological and morphometric variation in the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia: Echimyidae). Mammalian Biology, 69 (4): 258-269. PIGLIUCCI, M. & MURREN, C. J. 2003. Genetic assimilation and a possible evolutionary paradox: can macroevolution sometimes be so fast as to pass us by? Evolution 57, 1455– 1464. PIGLIUCCI, M. & SCHLICHTING, C. P. 1996. Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. IV. Relationship between plasticity and fitness. Heredity 76: 427-436. PIGLIUCCI, M. 1996. How organisms respond to environmental changes: From phenotypes to molecules (and vice versa). Trends in Ecology & Evolutiion, 11, n 4, 168 - 173. PIGLIUCCI, M. 2001. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. PRICE, T. D.; QVAMSTRON, A. & IRWIN, D. E. 2003. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 270, 1433– 1440. QUEITSCH, C.; SANGSTER, T. A. & LINDQUIST, S. 2002. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417, 618–624. RAVEN, P. H; EVERT, R. F; EICHHORN, S. E. 2001. O processo de evolução. Biologia vegetal. 6.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara koogan, cap.12, p.228 - 251. REIS, S. F.; DUARTE, L. C.; MONTEIRO, L. R.; VON ZUBEN, F. J. 2002. Geographic variation in cranial morphology in Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia: Echimyidae). I. Geometric descriptors and patterns of variation in shape. Journal of Mammalogy, 83 (2): 333- 344. REIS, S. F.; DUARTE, L. C.; MONTEIRO, L. R.; VON ZUBEN, F. J. 2002. Geographic variation in cranial morphology in Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia: Echimyidae). II. Geographic units, morphological discontinuities, and sampling gaps. Journal of Mammalogy, 83 (2): 345-353. RELYEA, R. A. 2002. Costs of phenotypic plasticity. American Naturalist. 159, 272–282. REY, L. 1993. Non-human vertebrate hosts of Schistosoma mansoni and schistosomiasis transmission in Brazil. Research and Reviews in Parasitology, 53: 13-25. RIBEIRO, A. C.; MALDONADO, A.; D’ANDREA, P. S.; VIEIRA, G. O. & REY, L. 1998. Susceptibility of Nectomys rattus (Pelzen, 1883) to experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni (Sambon, 1907): An potential reservoir in Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 93 (Supl. I): 295-299. RICKLEFS, R. E. 2003. Histórias de vida e ajustamento evolutivo. A economia da natureza. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, cap. 10, p.185 - 189. ROBINSON, B. W. & DUKAS, R. 1999. The influence of phenotypic modifications on evolution: the Baldwin effect and modern perspectives. Oikos 85, 582–589. RODRIGUES, R. S.; MACHADO, J. R. S; FAERSTEIN, N. F.; LENZI, H. L. & REY, L. 1992. Natural infection of wild rodents by Schistosoma mansoni – Parasitological aspects. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 87 (Supl. I): 271-276. ROHLF, F. J. & MARCUS, L. F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8(4): 129-132. ROTH, G. & WAKE, D. B. 1989. Conservation and innovation in the evolution of feeding invertebrates. In: Complex organismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates. (Eds: Wake, D. B. & Roth, G.) John Wiley & Sons, pp 7-21. ROTH, V. L. 1996. Cranial integration in the Sciuridae. American Zoologist 36: 14-23. RUTHERFORD, S. L. & LINDQUIST S. 1998. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396, 336–343. RUTHERFORD, S. L. 2000. From genotype to phenotype: buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information. BioEssays 22, 1095–1105. RUTHERFORD, S. L. 2003. Between genotype and phenotype: protein chaperones and evolvability. Nature Review Genetics 4, 263–274. SALLAM, H. M.; SEIFFERT, E. R. & SIMONS, E. L. 2009. Fossil and molecular evidence constrain scenarios for the early evolutionary and biogeographic history of hystricognathous rodents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 106 (39): 16722 – 16727. SCHEINER, S. M. & CALLAHAN, H. S. 1999. Measuring natural selection on phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 53:1704-1713. SCHEINER, S. M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 35-68. SCHLICHTING, C. D. & PIGLIUCCI, M. 1993. Control of phenotypic plasticity via regulatory genes. The American Naturalist 142: 367-371. SCHLICHTING, C. D. & PIGLIUCCI, M. 1998. Phenoypic Evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, 344 p. SCHLICHTING, C. D. 1986. The evolution phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 667-693 SCHLICHTING, C. D. 2004. The role of phenotypic plasticity in diversification. Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches (eds T.J. DeWitt & S.M. Scheiner), pp. 191–200. Oxford University Press, Oxford. SMITH, K. K. 1993. The form of the feeding apparatus in terrestrial vertebrates: studies on adaptation and constraint. Chap. 4. In: The skull. Vol. 3. (Eds: Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K.) Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, pp 150-196. SMITH, K. K. 1996. Integration of craniofacial structures during development in mammals. American Zoologist 36: 70-79. SOUZA, M. J. & YONENAGA-YASSUDA, Y. 1982. Chromosome variability of Sex chromosomes and NOR´s in Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 33: 197-203. STEARNS, A. D. 1989. The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscence 39: 436-445. STREILEN, K. E. 1982a. Ecology of small mammals in the semiarid Brazilian Caatinga. I. Climate and faunal composition. Annual Carnegie Museum, 51: 79-106. SULTAN, S. E. & SPENCER, H. G. 2002 Metapopulaiton structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. American Naturalist 160, 271–283. SULTAN, S. E. 1987. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evolutionary Biology 21: 127-178. SULTAN, S. E. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 44, 363–383. SVARTMAN, M. 1989. Levantamento cariotípico de roedores da região do Distrito Federal. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. SVENSSON, E. 1997. The speed of life-history evolution. Tree, 12 (10): 380-381. TEIXEIRA, B. R.; ROQUE, A. L. R.; BARREIROS-GÓMEZ, S. C.; BORODIN, P. M.; JANSEN, A. M. & D’ANDREA, P. S. 2005. Maintenance and breeding of Thrichomys (Rodentia: Echuimyidae) in captivity. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 100 (6): 527-530. THOMAS, D. C. & EVERSON, P. 1982. Geographic Variation in caribou on the Canadian arctic Islands. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60: 2442-2454. THOMPSON, J. D. 1991. Phenotypic plasticity as a component of evolutionary change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 246-249. VAN TIENDEREN, P. H. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45, 1317–1331. VAN TIENDEREN, P. H. 1997. Generalists, specialists, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in sympatric populations of distinct species. Evolution 51, 1372–1380. VAUGHAN, T. A. 1986. Mammalogy. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishing. Orlando. 196pp. VIA, S.; GOMULKIEWICZ, R.; DEJONG, G.; SCHEINER, S. M.; SCHLICHTING, C. D.; VAN TIENDEREN, P. H. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 212-217. VIA, S. & LANDE, R. 1985. Genotype-environment interactions and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505-522. VIA, S. 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annual Review of Entomology 35: 421-446. VIA, S. 1993. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or byproduct of selection in a variable environment. The American Naturalist 142: 352-365. VIEIRA, R. D. 2002. Variabilidade genetica e interação genotipo-ambiente para tamanho e forma da asa em duas especies de drosophila. Dissertação de Mestrado, Programa de Pós graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, UNICAMP, 76p. VUCETICH, M. G.; VERZI, D. H. & HARTENBERGER, J. L. 1999. Review and analysis of the radiation of the South American Hystricognathi (Mammalia, Rodentia). Comptes Rendu de l’ Acade´mie des Sciences, Sciences de la terre et des plane´tes 329:763–769. VUCETICH, M. G. & VERZI, D. H. 1991. Un nuevo Echimyidae (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) de la Edad Colhuehuapense de Patagonia y consideraciones sobre la sistemática de la familia. Ameghiniana 28 (1-2): 67-74. WADDINGTON, C. H. 1942. Analization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 150, 563-565. WERDELIN, L. 1986. Comparison of skull shape in marsupial and placental carnivores. Australian Journal of Zoology 34: 109-117. WERDELIN, L. 1987. Jaw geometry and molar morphology in marsupial carnivores: analysis of a constraint and its macroevolutionary consequences. Paleobiology 13 (3): 342-350. WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York. WIIG, O. & ANDERSEN, T. 1986. Sexual size dimorphism in the skull of Norwegian Lynx. Acta Theriologica, 31 (12): 147-155. WILBUR, H. M. & COLLINS, J. P. 1973. Ecological aspects of Amphibian metamorphosis. Science, 182 (4119): 1305-1314. WILSON, D. E. & REEDER, D. M. 2005. Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed), Johns Hopkins University Press, 2,142 pp. WRIGHT, S. 1931. Evolution of Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159. WYSS, A. R.; FLYNN, J. J.; NORELL, M. A.; SWISHER, C. C.; CHARRIER, R.; NOVACECK, M. J. & MCKENNA, M. C. 1993. South America’s earliest rodent and recognition of a new interval of mammalian evolution. Nature, 365: 434-437. WYSS, A. R.; FLYNN, J. J.; NORELL, M. A.; SWISHER III, C. C.; NOVACEK, M. J.; MCKENNA, M. C. & CHARRIER, R. 1994. Paleogene mammals from the Andes of central Chile: A preliminary taxonomic, biostratigraphic, and geochronologic assessment. American Museum of Natural History, Novitates 3098:1–31. YEH, P. J. & PRICE, T. D. 2004. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the successful colonization of a novel environment. American Naturalist. 164 (4), 531 – 542. ZELDITCH, M. L.; SWIDERSKI D. L.;SHEETS. H. D. & FINK, W. L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press: London. 443 pp.por
dc.subject.cnpqBiologia Geralpor
dc.thumbnail.urlhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/61275/2011%20-%20Jeiel%20Gabrir%20Carvalhaes.pdf.jpg*
dc.originais.urihttps://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3752
dc.originais.provenanceSubmitted by Sandra Pereira (srpereira@ufrrj.br) on 2020-07-23T22:00:55Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2011 - Jeiel Gabrir Carvalhaes.pdf: 2191303 bytes, checksum: 8baf437a8a3be03334d9458927b75f68 (MD5)eng
dc.originais.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-07-23T22:00:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2011 - Jeiel Gabrir Carvalhaes.pdf: 2191303 bytes, checksum: 8baf437a8a3be03334d9458927b75f68 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-06-29eng
Appears in Collections:Mestrado em Biologia Animal

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2011 - Jeiel Gabrir Carvalhaes.pdf2011 - Jeiel Gabrir Carvalhaes2.14 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.