Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/12766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Laércio Luiz Celin
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T02:20:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-22T02:20:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-18
dc.identifier.citationNASCIMENTO, Laércio Luiz Celin. Eficácia da aprendizagem ativa no ensino agrícola: uma revisão sistemática. 2020. 83 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação Agrícola) - Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ. 2020.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/12766-
dc.description.abstractConstantemente é preciso repensar as maneiras como a educação é promovida, estreitar a relação entre alunos e professor até que ambos atuem como parceiros. A metodologia ativa (MA) traz em suas premissas, ampliar a aquisição de conhecimento através da contextualização e problematização de situações, que aproximem as relações entre alunos e professores. Tal metodologia vem apresentando-se como alternativa à metodologia de ensino tradicional, caracterizada como instrução passiva do conhecimento, com reduzida interação entre aluno e professor. A MA é composta por diversos métodos ativos, porém, há necessidade de analisar as evidências de tais métodos principalmente na área agrícola. O presente estudo, utilizando-se de revisão sistemática como ferramenta, buscou responder se MA é eficaz no ensino agrícola, identificando e conceituando também os principais métodos ativos utilizados no ensino agrícola. Além disto, pretendeu analisar fatores importantes que precisam ser considerados e ou aprimorados ao se utilizar os métodos ativos. Seguindo rígido protocolo, “Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols”, (PRISMA-P), considerado referência em revisões sistemáticas, esta pesquisa utilizou como base de dados de pesquisas: Google Acadêmico, “Education Resources Information Center” (ERIC) e o Banco de teses da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Como critério de elegibilidade, os estudos selecionados deveriam conter uma população de estudantes de ensino regular, utilização de MA como intervenção, pesquisas experimentais ou quase experimentais, sem restrição de data de publicação ou de qualidade metodológica, porém considerando restrição de estudos às línguas inglesa e portuguesa. Foram utilizadas estratégias para extração de dados, avaliação de qualidade e apresentação de resultados, assim como ao término foi conduzida a síntese narrativa. Como resultado, esta pesquisa selecionou 22 estudos, sendo um proveniente do Canadá, dois da China e o restante originários dos Estados Unidos da América. O nível educacional dos estudos incluídos foram 11 de graduação, 10 de nível médio e um de nível fundamental. Os métodos ativos encontrados foram, aprendizagem baseada em problemas, resolução de problemas e sala de aula invertida, usados em nove estudos; já aprendizagem baseada em tecnologia apareceu em oito; a aprendizagem baseada em investigação esteve em três estudos; aprendizagem cooperativa e aprendizagem experiencial apareceram em dois estudos cada; e, por fim, aprendizagem em serviço que foi tema de um estudo. Após análise e síntese narrativa foi possível inferir que o uso de MA no ensino agrícola é ferramenta eficaz frente a métodos de ensino tradicionais. Os métodos ativos mais utilizados na educação agrícola foram resolução de problemas, aprendizagem baseada em problemas, sala de aula invertida, aprendizagem baseada em tecnologia, aprendizagem baseada em investigação, aprendizagem cooperativa, aprendizagem experiencial e aprendizagem em serviço. O tempo utilizado na intervenção assim como o treinamento do professor ao aplicar a MA são um dos fatores que podem influenciar a eficácia.por
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpor
dc.description.sponsorshipERIC - Education Resources Information Center (Google Acadêmico)por
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.subjectAprendizagem ativapor
dc.subjectRevisão sistemática na educaçãopor
dc.subjectEnsino Agrícolapor
dc.subjectActive learningeng
dc.subjectSystematic review in educationeng
dc.subjectAgricultural educationeng
dc.titleEficácia da aprendizagem ativa no ensino agrícola: uma revisão sistemáticapor
dc.title.alternativeEffectiveness of active learning in agricultural education: a systematic revieweng
dc.typeDissertaçãopor
dc.description.abstractOtherIt is constantly necessary to rethink the ways in which education is promoted, to strengthen the relationship between students and teacher until both act as partners. The active methodology (MA) brings in its premises, expanding the acquisition of knowledge through the contextualization and problematization of situations, which bring together the relationships between students and teachers. Such methodology has been presented as an alternative to the traditional teaching methodology, characterized as passive knowledge instruction, with reduced interaction between student and teacher. MA is composed of several active methods, however, there is a need to analyze the evidence of such methods mainly in the agricultural area. The present study, using systematic review as a tool, sought to answer whether MA is effective in agricultural education, identifying and conceptualizing also the main active methods used in agricultural education. In addition, it intended to analyze important factors that need to be considered and or improved when using active methods. Following a strict protocol, “Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols”, (PRISMA-P), considered a reference in systematic reviews, this research used as a research database: Google Scholar, “Education Resources Information Center” ( ERIC) and the thesis bank of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). As an eligibility criterion, the selected studies should contain a population of students of regular education, use of MA as an intervention, experimental or quasi-experimental research, with no restriction on the date of publication or methodological quality, but considering the restriction of studies to English and Portuguese. Strategies were used for data extraction, quality assessment and presentation of results, as well as at the end of the narrative synthesis. As a result, this research selected 22 studies, one from Canada, two from China and the rest from the United States of America. The educational level of the studies included were 11 undergraduate, 10 medium and one fundamental. The active methods found were, problem-based learning, problem solving and inverted classroom, used in nine studies; already technology-based learning appeared in eight; research-based learning has been in three studies; cooperative learning and experiential learning appeared in two studies each; and, finally, in-service learning, which was the subject of a study. After analysis and narrative synthesis, it was possible to infer that the use of MA in agricultural education is an effective tool compared to traditional teaching methods. The active methods most used in agricultural education were problem solving, problem-based learning, inverted classroom, technology-based learning, research-based learning, cooperative learning, experiential learning and in-service learning. The time used in the intervention as well as the training of the teacher when applying AM are one of the factors that can influence the effectiveness.eng
dc.contributor.advisor1Rossetto, Claudia Antonia Vieira
dc.contributor.advisor1ID110.702.478-12por
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1297230815845355por
dc.contributor.referee1Rossetto, Claudia Antonia Vieira
dc.contributor.referee2Monteiro, Rosa Cristina
dc.contributor.referee3Marin, Victor Augustus
dc.creator.ID090.970.927-01por
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-4519por
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5432506055881941por
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpor
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Agronomiapor
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpor
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Educação Agrícolapor
dc.relation.referencesABREU, José Ricardo Pinto de. Contexto atual do ensino médico: metodologias tradicionais e ativas: necessidades pedagógicas dos professores e da estrutura das escolas. Dissertação (Mestrado em Cardiologia) – Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do sul, Rio Grande do Sul, 2009. ALBERANI, Vilma; PIETRANGELI, P. De Castro; MAZZA, A. M. The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, v. 78, n. 4, p. 358, 1990. ALMILA, E. R. O. L. How to conduct scientific research?. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, v. 54, n. 2, p. 97, 2017. ANDREWS, Tessa M. et al. Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, v. 10, n. 4, p. 394-405, 2011. ANOHINA, Alla. Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, v. 8, n. 3, p. 91-102, 2005. BERBEL, Neusi Aparecida Navas. As metodologias ativas e a promoção da autonomia de estudantes. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, v. 32, n. 1, p. 25-40, 2011. BONWELL, Charles C.; EISON, James A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1991. BORGES, Tiago Silva; ALENCAR, Gidélia. Metodologias ativas na promoção da formação crítica do estudante: o uso das metodologias ativas como recurso didático na formação crítica do estudante do ensino superior. Cairu em Revista, v. 3, n. 4, p. 119-43, 2014. BRINGLE, R. G.; HATCHER, J. A. A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, v.2, p.112-122, 1995. BROOKS, D. Christopher. Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 42, n. 5, p. 719-726, 2011. BROWN, Malcolm; LONG, Philip. Trends in learning space design. Learning spaces, v. 9, p. 1-9.11, 2006. BURKE, Alison. Group work: How to use groups effectively. Journal of Effective Teaching, v. 11, n. 2, p. 87-95, 2011. CARNEY, Tracey; MOREE, Joey; KENNEDY, Yolanda. In Response to The Deans for Impact Report: How Do Students Solve Problems? Practical Applications for Educators. Journal of Applied Educational and Policy Research, v. 3, n. 1, 2017. CAVALIER, Jamie C.; KLEIN, James D. Effects of cooperative versus individual learning and orienting activities during computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 46, n. 1, p. 5-17, 1998. CHEEK, Jimmy G. et al. Relationship of supervised agricultural experience program participation and student achievement in agricultural education. Journal of agricultural education, v. 35, n. 2, p. 1-5, 1994. CHEN, Yang-Hsueh; CHEN, Pin-Ju. MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, v. 86, p. 55-70, 2015. CLARKE, Mike; HORTON, Richard. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. The Lancet, v. 357, n. 9270, p. 1728, 2001. COOK, Deborah J.; MULROW, Cynthia D.; HAYNES, R. Brian. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of internal medicine, v. 126, n. 5, p. 376-380, 1997. COREN, Esther; FISHER, Mike. The conduct of systematic research reviews for SCIE knowledge reviews. Social Care Institute for Excellence, London, 2006. COSTA, Felipe da. Práticas de ensino inovadoras e a aprendizagem em ciências contábeis. Monografia (Graduação em Ciências Contábeis) – Universidade do Vale do Taquari - Univates, Lajeado, 2015. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10737/783. Acesso em: 18 de abr de 2019. COUNSELL, Carl. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Annals of internal medicine, v. 127, n. 5, p. 380-387, 1997. DALGARNO, Barney. Constructivist computer assisted learning: theory and techniques. Proceedings of the ASCILITE96 conference, p. 127-148, 1996. DE SOUSA, Herivelton A. et al. O Ensino de Geografia sob um enfoque motivador. Gaia Scientia, v. 10, n. 4, 2016. DELOZIER, Sarah J.; RHODES, Matthew G. Flipped classrooms: a review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, v. 29, n. 1, p. 141-151, 2017. DIESEL, Aline; BALDEZ, Alda Leila Santos; MARTINS, Silvana Neumann. Os princípios das metodologias ativas de ensino: uma abordagem teórica. Revista Thema, v. 14, n. 1, p. 268-288, 2017. DRIOUECH, N. et al. Alumni network and peer learning: experience of Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari. Agriculture & Forestry/Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo, v. 61, n. 1, 2015. ESTEPP, Christopher M.; ROBERTS, T. Grady. A model for transforming the undergraduate learning experience in colleges of agriculture. NACTA Journal, v. 55, n. 3, p. 28-32, 2011. ETLING, Arlen. What is nonformal education. Journal of agricultural education, v. 34, n. 4, p. 72-76, 1993. FARLEY, Helen; MURPHY, Angela; REES, Sharon. Revisiting the definition of Mobile Learning. In: ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. p. 283-287, 2013. FRANZ, Nancy K. et al. How farmers learn: Improving sustainable agricultural education. Virginia Cooperative Extension, 2009. FREEMAN, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 111, n. 23, p. 8410-8415, 2014. FUCHS, Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa; PAIM, Betina Soldateli. Revisão sistemática de estudos observacionais com metanálise. Revista HCPA. Porto Alegre. v. 30, n. 3, p. 294-301, 2010. FURCO, Andrew, "Service-Learning: A Balanced Approach to Experiential Education". Service Learning, General. 128p. 1996. GAO, S. et al. Application of problem-based learning in instrumental analysis teaching at Northeast Agricultural University. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, v. 410, n. 16, p. 3621-3627, 2018. GEMIGNANI, Elizabeth Yu Me Yut. Formação de professores e metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagem: ensinar para a compreensão. Fronteiras da Educação, v. 1, n. 2, 2013. GENTRY, James W. What is experiential learning. Guide to business gaming and experiential learning, v. 9, p. 20, 1990. GINN, Wanda Y. Jean Piaget-intellectual development. Retrieved June, v. 9, p. 2003, 1995. Disponível em: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/33522888/despre_teoria_ dezvoltarii_intelectuale__jean_piaget.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3 AExpires=1556647483&Signature=BTc5lRH403dnQgpdhKT0Ay8PxN0%3D&responsecont entdisposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DDespre_teoria_dezvoltarii_intelectuale_j.pdf. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2019. GOERGEN, Pedro. A pesquisa educacional no Brasil: dificuldades, avanços e perspectivas. Em Aberto, v. 5, n. 31, 1986. GORALNIK, Lissy; THORP, Laurie; RICKBORN, Alissa. Food System Field Experience: STEM Identity and Change Agency for Undergraduate Sustainability Learners. Journal of Experiential Education, v. 41, n. 3, p. 312-328, 2018. GORMALLY, Cara et al. Effects of inquiry-based learning on students' science literacy skills and confidence. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, v. 3, n. 2, p. n2, 2009. GOUGH, David. Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research papers in education, v. 22, n. 2, p. 213-228, 2007. GRÉGOIRE, Geneviève; DERDERIAN, François; LE LORIER, Jacques. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? Journal of clinical epidemiology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 159-163, 1995. GREEN, Linda Schwartz; CASALE-GIANNOLA, Diane. 40 Active Learning Strategies for the Inclusive Classroom, Grades K 5. Corwin Press, 2011. GWEE, Matthew Choon‐Eng. Problem‐Based Learning: A Strategic Learning System Design For The Education Of Healthcare Professionals in the 21ST Century. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, v. 25, n. 5, p. 231-239, 2009. HADDAWAY, Neal Robert et al. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS one, v. 10, n. 9, 2015. HAMER, Susan; COLLINSON, Gill. Achieving Evidence-Based Practice E-Book: A Handbook for Practitioners. Elsevier Health Sciences, e. 2, ISBN 07020 27766, 2014. HERNANDEZ-VILLAFUERTE, Karla et al. Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature. Health research policy and systems, v. 15, n. 1, p. 3, 2017. HILL, Nikki L. et al. Subjective cognitive impairment and affective symptoms: a systematic review. The Gerontologist, v. 56, n. 6, p. e109-e127, 2016. HUNG, Woei; JONASSEN, David. H.; LIU, Rude. "Problem-based learning." Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, v.3.1, p.485-506, 2008. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Sinopse do Censo Demográfico 2010. Gráfico População nos censos demográficos, segundo as Unidades da Federação e a situação do domicílio – 1960/2010. Disponível em: <https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/sinopse/index.php?dados=8> Acesso em: 19 de setembro de 2018. ILLERIS, Knud. What do we actually mean by experiential learning?. Human Resource Development Review, v. 6, n. 1, p. 84-95, 2007. JONASSEN, David H. Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problemsolving learning environments. Routledge, 2010. KESELMAN, Alla. Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 40, n. 9, p. 898-921, 2003. KITCHENHAM, Barbara. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Joint Technical Report, Keele University, Keele, UK, v. 33, n. 2004, p. 1-26, 2004. KITELEY, Robin; STOGDON, Christine. Literature reviews in social work. 1st edition. Sage, ISBN 978-14462-0126-8, London, 2013. KOLB, David A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, 2014. KOLLER, Vinz; HARVEY, Sandra; MAGNOTTA, Micheline. Technology-based learning strategies. Social Policy Research Associates Inc. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.doleta. gov/reports/papers/TBL_Paper_FINAL.pdf. Acesso em: 31 de mar de 2020. KRÜGER, Letícia Meurer. Método Tradicional e Método Construtivista de Ensino no Processo de Aprendizagem: uma investigação com os acadêmicos da disciplina Contabilidade III do curso de Ciências Contábeis da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Dissertação (Mestrado em Contabilidade) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2013. KUZMA, Lynn M. The World Wide Web and active learning in the international relations classroom. PS: Political Science & Politics, v. 31, n. 3, p. 578-584, 1998. KYRIACOU, Chris. Effective teaching in schools theory and practice. Oxford University Press-Children, 2010. LILLARD, Angeline Stoll. Montessori: The science behind the genius. Third edition. Oxford University Press, 2016. LINDSTROM, Carolyn. DROLET, Bonita M. What's Missing: Best Practices for Teaching Students with Disabilities. Editora Rowman & Littlefield, 142p, 2017. LLERIS, Knud. What do we actually mean by experiential learning?. Human Resource Development Review, v. 6, n. 1, p. 84-95, 2007. LORENZEN, Michael. Active learning and library instruction. Illinois Libraries, v. 83, n. 2, p. 19-24, 2001. LOVELL, Jonathan. Self-disclosure in Mental Health Services. Tese (Doutorado em Política e Serviço Social). University of York, 2017 MACKENZIE, Heather et al. Systematic reviews: what they are, why they are important, and how to get involved. Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology, v. 1, n. 4, p. 193-202, 2012. MACPHERSON, Alice. Cooperative Learning group activities for college courses. Surrey, BC Canada: Kwantlen Polytechnic University, p. 1-13, 2015. MAHER, Mary Lou et al. Flipped classroom strategies for CS education. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. p. 218-223, 2015. MALLETT, Brian. The Role of Trust and Collaboration toward Innovation in Outsourced Manufacturing Supply Chains: A Systematic Review. Tese de Doutorado. Maryland University College, 2017. MANFREDI, Sílvia Maria. Metodologia do ensino: diferentes concepções. Campinas: F. E./UNICAMP, mimeo, 1993. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile .php/1974332/mod_resource/content/1/METODOLOGIA-DO-ENSINO-diferentes-concep% C3%A7%C3%B5es.pdf. Acesso em: 18 de abr de 2019. MARTÍNEZ-MESA, Jeovany et al. Sample size: how many participants do I need in my research?. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, v. 89, n. 4, p. 609-615, 2014. MELINE, Timothy. Selecting studies for systematic review: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Contemporary issues in communication science and disorders, v. 33, n. 21-27, 2006. MELLATI, Morteza; KHADEMI, Marzieh. Technology-based education: Challenges of blended educational technology. In: Advanced online education and training technologies. IGI Global, p. 48-62, 2019. MICHAEL, Joel. Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in physiology education, v. 30, n. 4, p. 159-167, 2006. MICHAEL, Joel; MODELL, Harold I. Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: A working model for helping the learner to learn. Routledge, 2003. MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, v. 151, n. 4, p. 264-269, 2009. MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1, 2015. MOK, Heng Ngee. Teaching tip: The flipped classroom. Journal of information systems education, v. 25, n. 1, p. 7, 2014. MORÁN, José. Mudando a educação com metodologias ativas. Coleção Mídias Contemporâneas. Convergências Midiáticas, Educação e Cidadania: aproximações jovens, v. 2, p. 15-33, 2015. MOREIRA, Marco Antônio. Subsídios teóricos para o professor pesquisador em ensino de ciências: A Teoria da Aprendizagem Significativa. Porto Alegre-RS, 2009. MUKUMBANG, Ferdinand C. et al. An exploration of group-based HIV/AIDS treatment and care models in Sub-Saharan Africa using a realist evaluation (Intervention-Context-Actor- Mechanism-Outcome) heuristic tool: a systematic review. Implementation Science, v. 12, n. 1, p. 107, 2017. MULATU, Mebratu; BEZABIH, Woldemariam. The Effects of Teachers’ Perceptions on the Implementations Active Learning in EFL Classroom. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, v. 18, n. 6, p. 31-37, 2018. NASCIMENTO, Tuliana Euzébio do; COUTINHO, Cadidja. Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem e o ensino de Ciências. Revista Multiciência online. Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões– Campus Santiago, 2016. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Transforming agricultural education for a changing world. National Academies Press, 206p, 2009. NEWMAN, Mark; ELBOURNE, Diana. Improving the usability of educational research: guidelines for the REPOrting of primary empirical research Studies in Education (The REPOSE Guidelines). Evaluation & Research in Education, v. 18, n. 4, p. 201-212, 2004. NUNES, Eunice Pereira dos Santos. Um método para avaliar a aquisição de conhecimento em ambientes virtuais de aprendizagem tridimensionais interativos. Tese (Doutorado em engenharia da computação). Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. OLIVEIRA, Cacilda Lages. A Metodologia de Projetos como recurso de ensino e aprendizagem na Educação Básica. Significado e contribuições da afetividade, no contexto da Metodologia de Projetos na Educação Básica. Dissertação (Mestrado em educação tecnológica). Centro Federal de educação tecnológica de Minas Gerais, 2004. OLSEN, Jennifer K.; RUMMEL, Nikol; ALEVEN, Vincent. Learning Alone or Together? A Combination Can Be Best! Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2017. PARR, Brian; EDWARDS, M. Craig. Inquiry-based instruction in secondary agricultural education: Problem-solving-An old friend revisited. Journal of Agricultural Education, v. 45, p. 106-117, 2004. PAWSON, Ray et al. Types and quality of social care knowledge. Stage two: towards the quality assessment of social care knowledge. ESRC UK Center for Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Working Paper, v. 18, 2003. PEDASTE, Margus et al. Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, v. 14, p. 47-61, 2015. PETTICREW, Mark; ROBERTS, Helen. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. PÓLYA, George. Mathematical Discovery on Understanding, Learning and Teaching problem Solving, Combined edition, Stanford University, 1981. POPAY, Jennie et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version, v. 1, p. b92, 2006. PRINCE, Michael. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, v. 93, n. 3, p. 223-231, 2004. REDDY, Indra K. Implementation of a pharmaceutics course in a large class through active learning using quick-thinks and case-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, v. 64, n. 4, p. 348-354, 2000. RIVERA, William M.; ALEX, Gary E. Human resource development for modernizing the agricultural workforce. Human Resource Development Review, v. 7, n. 4, p. 374-386, 2008. ROBERTS, T. Grady et al. Examining the teaching behaviors of successful teachers in a college of agricultural and life sciences. NACTA Journal, v. 56, n. 2, p. 21, 2012. ROBERTS, T. Grady. A philosophical examination of experiential learning theory for agricultural educataors. Journal of Agricultural Education, v. 47, n. 1, p. 17, 2006. ROEHL, Amy; REDDY, Shweta Linga; SHANNON, Gayla Jett. The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, v. 105, n. 2, p. 44-49, 2013. SAMPAIO, R.F. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Revista brasileira de fisioterapia, v. 11, n. 1, p. 83-89, 2007. SAVERY, John R. Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, v. 9, p. 5-15, 2015. SCHLOSSER, Ralf W. Appraising the quality of systematic reviews. Focus, v. 17, p. 1-8, 2007. SERRA, Fernando A. Ribeiro; FIATES, Gabriela Gonçalves; FERREIRA, Manuel Portugal. Publicar é difícil ou faltam competências? O desafio de pesquisar e publicar em revistas científicas na visão de editores e revisores internacionais. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 9, n. 4, p. 32-55, 2008. SHAMSEER, Larissa et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. Bmj, v. 349, p. 7647, 2015. SIMCOCK, Peter. Ageing with a unique impairment: a systematically conducted review of older deafblind people's experiences. Ageing & Society, v. 37, n. 8, p. 1703-1742, 2017. SLAVIN, Robert E. Instruction based on cooperative learning. In: Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Routledge, p. 358-374, 2011. SLAVIN, Robert E.; HURLEY, Eric A.; CHAMBERLAIN, Anne. Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. Handbook of psychology, p. 177-198, 2003. SPRONKEN-SMITH, Rachel et al. Where might sand dunes be on Mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, v. 32, n. 1, p. 71-86, 2008. STANIC, George MA; KILPATRICK, Jeremy. Perspectivas históricas da resolução de problemas no currículo de matemática. The Teaching and Assessment Problem Solving, Universidade da Georgia, EUA, 1989. TAWFIK, Andrew A.; LILLY, Christopher. Using a flipped classroom approach to support problem-based learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, v. 20, n. 3, p. 299-315, 2015. THOMPSON, Gregory W.; WARNICK, Brian K. Integrating Science into the Agricultural Education Curriculum: Do Science and Agriculture Teachers Agree?. Journal of Agricultural Education, v. 48, n. 3, p. 1-12, 2007. TOHIDI, Hamid; JABBARI, Mohammad Mehdi. The effects of motivation in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 31, p. 820-824, 2012. TUCKER, Bill. The flipped classroom. Education next, v. 12, n. 1, p. 82-83, 2012. ÜLTANIR, Emel. An Epistemologic Glance at the Constructivist Approach: Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, v.5, n.2, 2012. VIEIRA, Fabiana Andrade da Costa. Ensino por investigação e aprendizagem significativa crítica: análise fenomenológica do potencial de uma proposta de ensino. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. Bauru, 2012. WEIMER, Maryellen. Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2002. WOOD, Diana F. Problem based learning. Bmj, v. 326, n. 7384, p. 328-330, 2003. WORLD BANK. World Development Indicators Database. Scientific and technical journal articles. World Bank, 2000-2018. 2018. Disponível em: <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator /IP.JRN.ARTC.SC?end=2018&name_desc=false&start=2000&view=chart&year_low_desc=t rue.> Acesso em: 20 de maio de 2020.por
dc.subject.cnpqEducaçãopor
dc.thumbnail.urlhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/71595/2020%20-%20La%c3%a9rcio%20Luiz%20Celin%20Nascimento.pdf.jpg*
dc.originais.urihttps://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/6185
dc.originais.provenanceSubmitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2023-01-06T20:42:55Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2020 - Laércio Luiz Celin Nascimento.pdf: 1952097 bytes, checksum: 6fcd37e4955d057ee84e73543818da65 (MD5)eng
dc.originais.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-01-06T20:42:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2020 - Laércio Luiz Celin Nascimento.pdf: 1952097 bytes, checksum: 6fcd37e4955d057ee84e73543818da65 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-05-18eng
Appears in Collections:Mestrado em Educação Agrícola

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020 - Laércio Luiz Celin Nascimento.pdf1.91 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.