logo RIMA
logo UFRRJ

  1. Repositório de Múltiplos Acervos da UFRRJ
  2. Teses e Dissertações
  3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade
  4. Doutorado em Ciências Sociais em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/21667
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbifadel, Maria Fernanda Gebara-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-14T15:33:58Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-14T15:33:58Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-29-
dc.identifier.citationABIFADEL, Maria Fernanda Gebara. Governança de paisagens florestais: impactos sociais da bricolagem institucional em São Félix do Xingu. 2015. 224 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Sociais em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade) - Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, 2015.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/21667-
dc.description.abstractEm debates internacionais sobre florestas, há um reconhecimento crescente da importância da abordagem de paisagem (“landscape”, em inglês) para tratar de forma efetiva o desmatamento global. Perspectivas e teorias institucionais têm dado forma e modificado a percepção dos problemas ligados a escolhas individuais e coletivas em paisagens florestais. Essa tese explora os impactos sociais das instituições que moldam a dinâmica de redução do desmatamento no município de São Félix do Xingu, Estado do Pará. Sob a ótica das percepções de diferentes atores locais, a tese analisa as três principais medidas que colaboraram para a redução do desmatamento no município desde 2008: o embargo federal, o pacto municipal contra o desmatamento ilegal e o programa de paisagens sustentáveis. Com um foco nos pequenos produtores, o trabalho visa identificar os desafios associados à governança de paisagens florestais e características que contribuem para o seu sucesso, a fim de gerar perspectivas para uma abordagem de governança mais integrada na Amazônia. Instituições estão em constante movimento entre o que é estabelecido e o que acontece na prática, de forma a possibilitar, mas também impedir, escolhas e ações individuais. Esse processo, no entanto, pode reproduzir desigualdades estruturais. O conceito de bricolagem institucional, nesse sentido, é utilizado para examinar a natureza complexa e heterogênea da governança de paisagens florestais e a dinâmica em que instituições, redes, práticas e significados se concretizam em São Félix do Xingu. A análise institucional das medidas aqui analisadas demonstrou que as mesmas não são adaptadas às necessidades e capacidades dos pequenos produtores. O papel desses atores no desenvolvimento regional e rural sustentável pode ser significativamente aumentado.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropt_BR
dc.subjectPaisagens Florestaispt_BR
dc.subjectBricolagem Institucionalpt_BR
dc.subjectImpactos Sociaispt_BR
dc.subjectForest Landscapespt_BR
dc.subjectInstitutional Bricolagept_BR
dc.subjectsocial impactspt_BR
dc.titleGovernança de paisagens florestais: impactos sociais da bricolagem institucional em São Félix do Xingupt_BR
dc.title.alternativeGovernance of forest landscapes: social impacts of institutional bricolage in São Félix do Xinguen
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.description.abstractOtherIn international debates on forests there is growing recognition of the importance of a landscapes approach to effectively address global deforestation. Institutional perspectives and theories have shaped and changed the perception of problems related to individual and collective choices in forest landscapes. This thesis explores the social impacts of institutions that shape deforestation reduction dynamics in the municipality of São Félix do Xingu, State of Pará. From the perspective of different local actors perceptions, the thesis analyzes the three main measures that contributed to reducing deforestation in the municipality since 2008: the federal embargo, the municipal pact against illegal deforestation and the sustainable landscapes program. With a focus on small producers, the study aims to identify the challenges associated with forest landscapes governance and features that contribute to its success in order to generate prospects for a more integrated approach to governance in the Amazon. Institutions are constantly moving between what is established and what happens in practice, in order to enable, but also preclude, individual choices and actions. This process, however, can reproduce structural inequalities. The concept of institutional bricolage, in this sense, is used to examine the complex and heterogeneous nature of forest landscapes governance and the dynamic in which institutions, networks, practices and meanings are realized in São Félix do Xingu. The institutional analysis of the measures examined here demonstrated that they are not adapted to the needs and capacities of small producers. The role of these actors in regional and sustainable rural development can be significantly increased.en
dc.contributor.advisor1May, Peter Herman-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-8363pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7233450359051249pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1May, Peter Herman-
dc.contributor.referee1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-8363pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7233450359051249pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Maluf, Renato Sérgio Jamil-
dc.contributor.referee2IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6565-7148pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2361433814816659pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Schmitt, Claudia Job-
dc.contributor.referee3IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-2994pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3902719369521575pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Neves, Estela Maria Souza Costa-
dc.contributor.referee4IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5053-3193pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2467610910500672pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Toniolo, Maria Angélica-
dc.contributor.referee5Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1967561388391201pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8309600240786159pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Ciências Humanas e Sociaispt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedadept_BR
dc.relation.referencesACKERMAN, B. A.; STEWART, R. B. Reforming environmental law. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 37, p. 1333-1365, 1985. AGRAWAL, A. Common resources and institutional sustainability. In: OSTROM, E.; DIETZ, T.; DOLSAK, N.; STERN, P. C.; STONICH, S.; WEBER, E. U. (Ed.). The drama of the commons. Washington, DC, DC: National Academy Press, 2002. p. 41-86. AGRAWAL, A. Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. AGRAWAL, A.; RIBOT, J. Accountability in decentralization: a framework with south Asian and west African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee, v. 33, p. 473-502, 1999. AGRAWAL, A.; YADAMA, G. How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? forest panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and Change, Oxford, v. 28, n. 3, p. 435-465, 1997. ALDISERT, L.; HELMS, E. M. M. From command and control to coaching. Bank Marketing, Bradford, v. 32, p.36, 2000. AMACHER, G. S. Corruption: a challenge for economist interested in forest policy design. Journal of Forest Economics, London, v. 12, n. 2, p. 85-89, 2006. AMIGOS DA TERRA – ADT. Complex project, AdT (Amigos da Terra): complex project, mega risks: financial risks of the Rio Madeira Dam Complex. São Paulo. 2007. Disponível em:<http://www.banktrack.org/download/complex_project_ mega_risk_ financial_risks_of_ rio_ madeira_dam_project/0_complex_project_mega_ risk_ financial_risks_of_rio_madeira_dam_complex.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2014. ANAND, S.; SEN, A. Human development and economic sustainability. World Development, Oxford, v. 28 p. 2029-2049, 2000. ANDERSON, R. C.; HOFMANN, L. A.; RUSIN, M. The use of economic incentive mechanisms in environmental management. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute, 1990. (Research Paper, 51) ANDO, A.; MALLORY, M. Optimal portfolio design to reduce climate-related conser- vation uncertainty in the Prairie Pothole Region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, v. 108, n. 17, p. 6484–6489, 2012. ANDREWS, M. The limits of institutional reform in development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 ANDREWS, M.; PRITCHETT, L.; WOOLCOCK, M. Escaping capability traps through problem-driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2012. (Working Paper, 299) 195 ANGELSEN, A.; KAIMOWITZ, D. Agriculture technologies and tropical deforestation. New York: CAB International, 2001. ANUÁRIO Brasileiro da Pecuária: 2014. Santa Cruz do Sul: Ed. Gazeta Santa Cruz do Sul, 2004. Disponível em: <file:///Users/fernandagebara/Downloads/4507_2014pecuaria %20(1).pdf>. Acesso em: 5 jan. 2015. ARAUJO, C.; BONJEAN, C. A.; COMBES, J. L.; MOTEL, P. C.; REIS, E. J. Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 68, n. 89, p. 2461-2468, 2009. ARCE, A.; LONG, N. Anthropology, development and modernities.exploring discourses, counter-tendencies and violence. London: Routledge, 2000. ARIMA, E.; BARRETO, P.; BRITO, M. Pecuária na Amazônia: tendências e implicações para a conservação. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2005. ARMITAGE, D.; BERKES, F.; DALE, A.; KOCHO-SCHELLENBERG, E.; PATTON, E. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Global Environmental Change, Guildford, v. 21, n. 3, p. 995–1004, 2011. ARROW, K. J. The limits of organization. New York: Norton and Company, 1974. ARROW, K.; BOLIN, B.; COSTANZA, R.; DASGUPTA, P.; FOLKE. C.; HOLLING. C. S. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science, New York, v. 268, p. 520-521, 1995. ARTS, B.; BEHAGEL, J.; TURNHOUT, E.; KONING, J.; BOMMEL, S. A practice based approach to forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, Amsterdam, v. 49, p. 4-11, 2014. ARTS, B.; BUIZER, M. Forests, discourses, institutions: a discursive institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 5/6, p. 340- 347, 2009. ASSAD, E. D.; PINTO, H. S. Aquecimento global e cenários futuros da agricultura brasileira. São Paulo: Embrapa/Cepagri/Unicamp, 2008. ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DAS INDÚSTRIAS DE ÓLEOS VEGETAIS – ABIOVE. Estatística mensal do complexo soja com dados atualizados até dezembro de 2014 e previsão para 2015. São Paulo, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.abiove.org.br/site/ index.php?page=estatistica&area=NC0yLTE=>. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2014. ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE MARKETING RURAL E AGRONEGÓCIO – ABMR&A. Perfil comportamental e hábitos de mídia do produtor rural brasileira. São Paulo, 2010. Disponível em: <http://pt.slideshare.net/andreqcamargo/abmra-perfilcomportamental-e-hbitos-de-mdia do-produtor-rural-brasileiro>. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2014. ASSUNÇÃO, J.; GANDOUR, C.; PESSOA, P.; ROCHA, R. Deforestation scale and farm size: the need for tailoring policy in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: NAPC/PUC-Rio, 2015. (CPI Technical Report) ASSUNÇÃO, J.; GANDOUR, C.; ROCHA, R. Does credit affect deforestation? evidence from a rural credit policy in the Brazilian Amazon. Rio de Janeiro: NAPC/PUC-Rio, 2013. (CPI/NAPC Working Paper). Disponível em: <http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2013/01/Does-Credit-Affect -Deforestation-Evidence-from-a-Rural-Credit- Policy- in-the-Brazilian-Amazon-Technical-Paper-English.pdf/>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2015. ASSUNÇÃO, J.; GANDOUR, C.C.; ROCHA R. Deforestation slowdown in the legal Amazon: prices or policies? Rio de Janeiro: NAPC/PUC-Rio, 2002. (CPI Technical Report). Disponível em: <http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/riodejaneiro/files/2012/03/ Deforestation- Prices -or-Policies-Working- Paper.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. ASSUNÇÃO, J.; GANDOUR, C; ROCHA, R. DETErring deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: environmental monitoring and law enforcement. Rio de Janeiro: NAPC/PUC-Rio, 2002. May 2013a. (CPI/NAPC Working Paper). Disponível em:<http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication /deterring-deforestation-in-the- brazilianamazon- environmental-monitoring-and-law-enforcement/>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2015. ASSUNÇÃO, J.; ROCHA, R.; GANDOUR, C. Deforestation slowdown in the legal Amazon: prices or policies? Rio de Janeiro: NAPC/PUC-Rio, 2011. (CPI Technical Report). AZEVEDO, A.; RAJÃO, L. R.; COSTA, M.; STABILE, M. C. C.; ALENCAR, A.; MOUTINHO, P. Cadastro ambiental rural e sua influência na dinâmica do desmatamento na Amazônia Legal. Boletim Amazônia em Pauta, Brasília, n. 3, p. 3-16, 2014. BALAND, J. M.; PLATTEAU, J. P. The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management. World Development, Oxford, v. 27, n. 4, p. 773-788, 1999. BALIEIRO, C. Nota técnica: diagnóstico do desmatamento no município de SFX: anos 2012 até Agosto 2013. Belém: The Nature Conservancy, 2013. BALLET, J.; BAZIN, D. A basic model for multiple self. The Journal of Sócio-Economics, New York, v. 35, p. 1050-1060, 2006. BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL – BACEN. Anuário estatístico do crédito rural. 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.bcb.gov.br/?RELRURAL2012=>. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2014. BANCO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO SOCIAL – BNDES. BNDES amplia exigências para apoio à cadeia produtiva da pecuária bovina. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/bndes/bndes_pt/Institucional/Sala_de _Imprensa/Notic ias/2009/Todas/20090722_frigorifico.html>. Acesso em: 16 fev. 2015. BANDURA, A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1977. BANGAY, C.; BLUM, N. Education responses to climate change and quality: two parts of the same agenda? International Journal of Educational Development, Oxford, v. 30, n. 4, p. 359-368, Jul. 2010, BARNEY, G.; STRAUSS L. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967. BARR, N.; CARY, J. Influencing improved natural resource management on farms: a guide to understanding factors influencing the adaptation of sustainable resource practices. Canberra: Social Science Center, 2000. (Bureau of Resource Sciences- Discussion Paper). BARRETO, P.; ARAÚJO, E. O Brasil atingirá sua meta de redução do desmatamento? Belém: Instituto do Homem e meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2012. BARRETO, P.; ARIMA, E.; BRITO, M. Pecuária e desafios para a conservação ambiental na Amazônia. Belém: Instituto do Homem e meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2005. BARRETO, P.; SILVA, D. Os desafios para uma pecuária mais sustentável na Amazônia. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2013. BARROS, C. J. Uma gigantesca anarquia fundiária. Revista Problemas Brasileiro, Brasília, mar./abr. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.geografiaparatodos.com.br/index.php? pag=sl261>. Acesso em: 16 fev. 2015. BARTON, D. N. ; RING, I.; RUSCH, G.; MAY, P.; CLERCK, F.; VIGNOLA, R.; VIVAN, J. L.; ANSINK, E. Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision: a review of some methodological challenges. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 2010. (POLICYMIX Report, n. 2). Disponível em: <http://policymix.nina.no/Portals/ policymix/Documents/ Publications/Discussion%20papers/POLICYMIX%20Discussion%20P aper%201-2010.pdf>. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2014. BARTON, D. N.; BLUMENTRATH, S.; RUSCH, G. Policyscape: a spatially explicit evaluation of voluntary conservation in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation in norway. Society and Natural Resources, New York, v. 26, n. 10, p. 1185-1201, 2013. BATTERBURY, S. Landscapes of diversity: a local political ecology of livelihood diversification in south-western Niger. Cultural Geographies, London, v. 8, n. 4, p. 437-464, 2001. BEALL, J. From the culture of poverty to inclusive cities: re-framing urban policy and politics. Journal of International Development, Chichester, v. 12, n. 6, p. 483-856, 2000. BEALL, J. Valuing social resources or capitalising on them? the limits to pro-poor urban governance in nine cities of the south. International Planning Studies, London, v. 6, n. 4, p. 357-375, 2001. BECKER, B. K. Síntese do processo de ocupação da Amazônia: lições do passado e desafios do presente. In: BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Causas e dinâmicas do desmatamento na Amazônia. Brasília, 2001. p. 5-50. BECKER, C. The human actor in ecological economics: philosophical approach and research perspectives. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 60, p. 17-23, 2006. BECKER, G. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976. 198 BELL, S.; MORSE, S.; SHAH, R. A. Understanding stakeholder participation in research as part of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, London, v. 101, p. 13–22, 2012. BELLUZZO, L. G. M. Prefácio da primeira edição. In: CARDOSO DE MELLO, J. M. O capitalismo tardio. 11. ed. Campinas: Ed. Unesp, 2009 BEMELMANS-VIDEC, M. L.; RIST, R. C.; VEDUNG, E.; BEMELMANS-VIDEC, M. L.; RIST, R.C.; VEDUNG, E. Carrots, sticks and sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1998. BENNEAR, L. S.; STAVINS, R. N. Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments. Environmental and Resource Economics, New York, v. 37, n. 1, p. 111-129, 2007. BERG, B. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2009. BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. The social construction of reality: a treatise on the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1966. BIGGS, S. A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion. World Development, Oxford, v. 18, n. 11, p. 1481-1499, 1990. BINA, O.; LA CAMERA, F. Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the ‘double crisis’. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 70, n. 12, p. 2308- 2316, Oct. 2011. BINA, O.; VAZ, S. G. Environment and economies: From vicious relationships to virtuous responsibility. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 72, v. 15, p. 170-178, 2011. BITTENCOURT, G. A. Abrindo a caixa preta: o financiamento da agricultura familiar no Brasil. 2013. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia, Campinas. BLOMQUIST, W.; SCHLAGER, E.; TANG, S. Y.; OSTROM, E. Regularities from the field and possible explanations. In: OSTRON, E.; GARDNER, R.; WALKER, J. Rules, games & common-pool researh. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1994. p. 301-316. BÖCHER, M.; TÖLLER, A. E. Conditions for the emergence of alternative environ- mental policy instruments. In: GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CON-SORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2., 2003, Marburg. Proceeding... Marburg: ECPR, Sep. 2003. BOLTON, B. Control or lead? it's your choice. Information Systems Management, Boston, v. 22, n. 3, p. 81-82, 2005. BOOTH, D. Development as collective action problem: addressing the real challenges of african governance: synthesis report of the Africa power and politics programme. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2012. 199 BORREGAARD, N.; SEPÚLVEDA, C. Introducing economic instruments at an early stage of environmental policy making. Santiago: North-South Center Miami, 1998. BOURDIEU, P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. BOURDIEU, P. The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990a BOURDIEU, P. What makes a social class? on the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, Berkeley, v. 32. p. 1-17, 1987. BOWLES, S.; GINTIS, H. A cooperative species: human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. BRANDÃO, A.; SOUZA, C.; PINTO, A.; AMARAL, P.; VERÍSSIMO, A. Situação do desmatamento nos assentamentos de reforma agraria no Estado do Pará. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2013. BRANSON, C.; DUFFY, B.; PERRY, C.; WELLINGS, D. Acceptable behaviour? public opinion on behaviour change policy. London: Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute, 2012. BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Plano agrícola e pecuário 2014-2015. Brasília, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.agricultura.gov.br/pap>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. BRASIL. Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia. Inventário nacional de emissões de gases de efeito estufa: relatório preliminar. Brasília, 2004. BRASIL. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Plano decenal de expansão de energia 2021. Brasília, 2013. BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Catálogo de publicações do programa piloto para proteção das florestas tropicais do Brasil: 17 anos de atuação na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica. Brasília, 2009. BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Plano de ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento na Amazônia legal – PPCDAM: documento de avaliação 2004-2007. Brasília, 2008. BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. REDD+: documento-síntese com subsídios de múltiplos atores para a preparação de uma estratégia nacional. Brasília, 2011. BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. REDD+: relatório de painel técnico do MMA sobre financiamento, benefícios e cobenefícios. Brasília, 2012. BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. São Félix do Xingu a caminho da redução do desmatamento. Brasília, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.mma.gov.br/index.php/ comunicacao/agencia-informma?view=blog&id=470>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. BRASIL. Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Civil. Anuário brasileiro de desastres naturais. Brasília, 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.integracao.gov.br/web/guest/publicacoes-sedec>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. 200 BRASIL. Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Civil. Anuário brasileiro de desastres naturais. Brasília, 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.integracao.gov.br/web/guest/publicacoes-sedec>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. BRESSERS, H. A.; O‘TOOLE, L. J. Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context. In: ELIADIS, P.; HILL, M.; HOWLETT, M. (Ed.). Designing government: from instruments to Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2005. BRITO, B.; BARRETO, P. A eficácia da aplicação da lei de crimes ambientais pelo Ibama para proteção de florestas no Pará. Revista de Direito Ambiental, São Paulo, n. 43, p. 35-65, 2006. BRITO, B.; BARRETO, P. A regularização fundiária avançou na Amazônia? os dois anos do Programa Terra Legal. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2011. BROCKHAUS, M.; ANGELSEN, A. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: a political economy framework. In: ANGELSEN, A.; BROCKHAUS, M.; SUNDERLIN, W.; VERCHOT, L. (Ed.). Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research, 2012. p. 15-30. BROMLEY, D. W. Making the commons work. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, 1992. BRONDÍZIO, E. S.; CAK, A.; CALDAS, M. M.; MENA, C.; BILSBORROW, R.; FUTEMMA, C. T.; LUDEWIGS, T.; MORAN, E. F.; BATISTELLA, M. Small farmers and deforestation in Amazonia. In: KELLER, M.; BUSTAMANTE, M.; GASH, J.; DIAS, P. S. (Ed.). Amazonia and global change. Washington, DC. American Geophysical Union, 2013.. BYERLEE, D.; STEVENSON, J.; VILLORIA, N. Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation. Global Food Security, New York, v. 3, p. 92-98, 2014. CAMARGO, F. CAR para “inglês ver”. Brasília: Instituto Sócio-Ambiental, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.socioambiental.org/pt-br/blog/blog-do-ppds/car-para-inglesver>. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2014. CAMPBELL, D. Social attitudes and other acquired behavioural dispositions. In: KOCH, S. (Ed.). Psychology: a study of a science. New York: McGraw Hill, 1963. p. 94-172. CAMPBELL, J. L. Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. CAMPBELL, K. T.; CROSBIE, L.; HOWARD, R.; MITCHELL, A.; RIPLEY, S. The forest footprint disclosure annual review 2009. Oxford: Global Canopy Programme, 2010. CANO, W. Power, organization and conflicts in Northern Bolivian communities after forest governance reforms. 2012. Thesis (PhD) - Utrecht University, Utrecht. CARDOSO DE MELLO, J. M. O capitalismo tardio. 11. ed. Campinas: Ed. Unesp, 2009. 201 CARDOSO, L. V. Financiamento agroambiental no Brasil: subsídio para desenvolvimento de políticas de crédito de apoio à regularização ambiental de propriedades rurais. São Paulo: Instituto Sócio-Ambiental, 2011. CARNEIRO, M. S. A construção social do mercado de madeiras certificadas na Amazônia brasileira: a atuação das ONGs ambientalistas e das empresas pioneiras. Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, v. 22, n. 3, p. 681-713, 2007. CASH, D. W.; MOSER, S. C. Linking local and global scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Guildford: Global Environmental Change, 2000. CAVALCANTE, G. C. Diagnóstico do status atual e proposta de reestruturação organizacional da Comissão do Pacto Municipal para o Fim do Desmatamento Ilegal de São Félix do Xingu/PA. Belém: The Nature Conservancy, 2013. CAVALCANTI, C. Características da governança ambiental no Brasil. In: REUNIÃO DA ABA, 24., 2004, Olinda. Anais... Olinda: ABA, 2004. (FP.27: Antropologia e a práxis socioambiental). CELENTANO, D.; VERISSIMO, A. O avanço da fronteira na Amazônia: do boom ao colapso. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2007. CHOMSKY, N. Noam chomsky on the purpose of education. Disponível em: <http://www.brainpickings.org/2012/03/13/noam-chomsky-on-the-purpose-of-education/>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2015. CLEAVER, F. D.; KONING, J. Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, Utrecht, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2015. CLEAVER, F. Development through bricolage: rethinking institutions for natural resource management. Abingdon: Routledge-Earthscan, 2012. CLEAVER, F. Reinventing institutions: bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European Journal of Development Research, London, v. 14, n. 2, p. 11-30, 2002. CLEAVER, F.; FRANKS, T. How institutions elude design: river basin management and sustainable livelihoods. Bradford: Bradford Centre for International Development, 2005. (BCID Research Paper, 12) CLEMENT, F. Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, Dordrecht, v. 43, n. 2, p. 129-156, 2010. COCKS, M. L.; WIERSUM, K. F. The significance of biodiversity to rural households in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, London, v. 13, p. 39-58, 2003. COLLINS, K. B.; ISON, R. L. Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy &Governance, New York, v. 19, n. 6, p. 358-373, 2009. 202 CONNELLY, S.; RICHARDSON, T.; MILES, T. Situated legitimacy: deliberative arenas and the new rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies, New York, v. 22, p. 267-277, 2006. COPESTAKE, J.; WILLIAMS, R. Political economy analysis, aid effectiveness and the art of development management. Bath: University of Bath, 2012. (Bath Papers in International Development and Well-Being, 18) CORBERA, E. Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, London, v. 4, n. 6, p. 612-619, Dec. 2012. COSTA, F. A. Formação agropecuária na Amazônia: desafios do desenvolvimento sustentável. Belém: UFPA-NAEA, 2000. CRANE, T. A. Bringing science and technology studies into agricultural anthropology: technology development as cultural encounter between farmers and researchers. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, New York, v. 36, p. 45-55, 2014. CRAWFORD, S.; OSTROM, E. A Grammar of institutions. The American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 89, n. 3, p. 582-600, 1995. CUNDILL, G.; FABRICIUS, C. Monitoring in adaptive co-management: toward a learning based approach. Journal of Environmental Management, London, v. 90, n. 11, p. 3205- 3211, 2009. CUNNINGHAM, P.; EDLER, J., FLANAGAN, K.; LAREDO, P. Innovation policy mix and instrument interaction: a review. Manchester: Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, 2013. (Nesta Working Paper, 13/20). Disponível em: <www.nesta.org.uk/wp13- 202013>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. DARNTON, A. Memorandum by Andrew Darnton, submission to the House of Lords inquiry. In: HOUSE OF LORDS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE. Behaviour change written evidence. London, 2011. p. 218-228. DE JONG, W. Diversity variation and change in Ribereño agriculture and agroforestry. 1995. Thesis (PhD) - Agricultural University Wageningen, Wageningen. DE KONING, J. Reshaping Institutions: bricolage processes in smallholder forestry in the Amazon. 2011 (PhD thesis) - Agricultural University Wageningen,Wageningen. DE KONING, J. Unpredictable outcomes in forestry: governance institutions in practice. Society & Natural Resource, Madison, v. 27, n. 4, p. 358-371, 2014. DE KONING, J.; BENNEKER, C. Bricolage practices in local forestry. In: ARTS, B.; BEHAGEL, J.; TURNHOUT, E.; KONING, J.; BOMMEL, S. (Ed.). Forest and nature governance: a practice based approach. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. (World Forests, 14). DELGADO, G. A questão agrária no Brasil, 1950-2003. In: JACCOUD, L. (Ed.). Questão social e políticas sociais no Brasil contemporâneo. Brasília: IPEA, 2005. p. 51-90. DIAW, M. C. Elusive meanings: decentralization, conservation and local democracy. GERMAN, L.; COLFER, C. J. P.; BARROW, E.; KUCHLI, C.; BLASER, J.; WARDOJO, 203 W. (Ed.). Forest governance and decentralisation in Africa: linking local, regional and global dialogues. London: Earthscan, 2010. p. 1-25. DIDUCK, A. P. Incorporating participatory approaches and social learning. In: MITCHELL, B. (Ed.). Resource and environmental management in Canada: addressing conflict and uncertainty. 4th ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 495-525. DIETZ, T.; OSTROM, E.; STERN, P. C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, New York, v. 302, p. 1907-1912, 2003. DOLSAK, N.; OSTROM, E. (Ed.). The commons in the new millennium. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2003. DOUGLAS, M. How institutions think. London: Routledge, 1987. DOUTHWAITE, B.; GUMMERT, M. Learning selection revisited: how can agricultural researchers make a difference? Agricultural Systems, Essex, v. 103, n. 5, p. 245-255, 2010. DUCHELLE, A. E.; CROMBERG, M.; GEBARA, M. F.; GUERRA, R.; MELO, T.; LARSON, A.; CRONKLETON, P.; BÖRNER, J.; SILLS, E.; WUNDER, S.; BAUCH, S.; MAY, P.; SELAYA, G.; SUNDERLIN, W. D. Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, Oxford, v. 55, p. 53-67, 2014. DUNCAN, A.; WILLIAMS, G. Making development assistance more effective through using political-economy analysis: what has been done and what have we learned? Development Policy Review, London, v. 30, n. 2, p. 133-148, 2012. EDWARDS, V. M.; STEIN, N. A. Developing an analytical framework for multiple use commons. Journal of Theoretical Politics, London, v. 10, n. 3, p. 347-83, 1998. EGGERTSSON, T. Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge Survey of Economic Literature, 1990. EHRING, J. Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in Post-soviet water governance. Water Alternatives , Washington, DC, v. 2, n. 1, p. 61-81, 2009 EKPE, E. K. A review of economic instruments employed for biodiversity conservation. The Journal of Sustainable Development, Toronto, v. 9, n. 1, p. 16-32, 2012. ELLIOT, E.; KIEL, L. D. Introduction. In: ______ (Ed.). Chaos theory in the social sciences: foundations and applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996. EMERTON, L. Economics and the convention on biological diversity. Nairobi: The World Conservation Union, 2001. Disponível em: <https://www.cbd.int/doc/nbsap/economics/ Synthesis%28Economic%29.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. ESCADA, M. I. S.; VIEIRA, I. C. G.; KAMPEL, S. A.; ARAÚJO, R.; VEIGA, J. B.; AGUIAR, A. P. D. Processos de ocupação nas novas fronteiras da Amazônia (o interflúvio do Xingu/Iriri). Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 19, n. 54, p. 09-23, 2005. 204 FATORELLI, L.; GEBARA, M. F.; MAY, P.; ZHANG, S.; DI GREGORIO, M. The REDD+ governance landscape and the challenge of coordination in Brazil. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research, 2015. FEARNSIDE, P. M. Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conservation Biology, Boston, v. 19, n. 3, p. 680-688, 2005. FERRAZ, C. Explaining agriculture expansion and deforestation: evidence from the Brazilian Amazon 1980/98. Brasília: IPEA, 2001 (Texto para Discussão, 828). FLANAGAN, K.; UYARRA, E.; LARANJA, M. The ‘policy mix’ for innovation: rethinking innovation policy in a multi-level, multi-actor context. Manchester: Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, 2010. (Working Paper Series). Disponível em: <https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/ukac-man-scw:82698>. Acesso em: 16 dez. 2014. FOLEY, J. A.; ASNER, G. P.; COSTA, M. H.; COE, M. T.; DEFRIES, R.; GIBBS, H. K.; HOWARD, E. A. OLSON, S.; PATZ, J.; RAMANKUTTY, N.; SNYDER, P. Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Washington, DC, v. 5, p. 25-32, 2007. FONSECA, A.; SOUZA JR., C.; VERÍSSIMO, A. Boletim do desmatamento da Amazônia Legal (janeiro 2015) SAD. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2015. FORMAN, R. T. T. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology, Dordrecht, v. 10, n. 3, p. 133-142, 1995. FORSYTH, T. E.; JOHNSON, C. Elinor Ostrom's legacy: governing the commons, and the rational choice controversy. Development and Change, Oxford, v. 45, n. 5, p. 1093-1110, 2014. FORSYTH, T. Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD+. In: ANGELSEN, A. (Ed.). Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. Bogor Barat: Center for International Forestry Research, 2009. p. 113-122. FOUCAULT, M. Governmentality. in: BURCHELL, G.; GORDON, C.; MILLER, P. (Ed.). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991. p. 87-104. 1991. FOUCAULT, M. Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. London: Harvester, 1980. FOUCAULT, M. The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In: RABINOW, P. (Ed.). Ethics: essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. London: Penguin, 1994. v. 1, p. 281-301 FOULON, J.; LANOIE, P.; LAPLANTE, B. Incentives for pollution control: regulation or information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, New York, v. 44, p. 169-187, 2002. FREEMAN, R. Epistemological bricolage: how practitioners make sense of learning. Administration & Society, Newbury Park, v. 39, n. 4, p. 476-496, 2007. 205 FUKUYAMA, F. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Penguin Books, 1995. FUNDER, M.; MARANI, M. Local bureaucrats as bricoleurs: the everyday implementation practices of county environment officers in rural Kenya. International Journal of the Commons, Utrecht, v. 9, n. 1, p. 87-106, mar. 2015. GALVAN, D. The market meets scared fire: land pawning as institutional syncretism in interwar Senegal. African Economic History, Madison, n. 25, p. 9-41, 1997. GARCIA, B. The Amazon from an international law perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. GASQUES, J. G.; YOKOMIZO, C. Avaliação dos incentivos fiscais na Amazônia. Brasília: IPEA, 1985. mimeo. GAVENTA, J.; CORNWALL, A. Power and knowledge. In: REASON, P.; BRADBURY, H. (Ed.). The sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE Publications, 2008. p. 70-79. GEBARA, M. F. Importance of local participation in achieving equity in benefit-sharing mechanisms for REDD+: a case study from the Juma Sustainable Development Reserve. International Journal of the Commons, Utrecht, v. 7, n. 2, p. 473-497, Aug. 2013. GEBARA, M. F. Sustainable landscapes program in São Felix do Xingu. In: SILLS, E.O.; ATMADJA, S.; SASSI, C.; DUCHELLE, A.; KWEKA, D.; PRADNJA I.; RESOSUDARMO, A.; SUNDERLIN, W.D. (Ed.). REDD+ on the Ground. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research, 2014. GEBARA, M. F.; MAY, P.; ROCHA SAMPAIO, R. S.; THUAULT, A. REDD+ initiatives in Brazil: how are global climate accords reflected on the ground? In: SIMILÄ, J.; PRIMMER, E. (Ed.). Legal analysis of the relationship between WTO law, European state aid and nature conservation law, and economic instruments for biodiversity protection. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 2012. p. 25-42. (POLICYMIX Report, n. 7) Disponível em: <http://policymix.nina.no/Portals/policymix/Documents/POLICYMIX%20 Report%207_2012.pdf>. Acesso em: 7 jan. 2015. GEBARA, M.; FATORELLI, L.; MAY, P.; ZHANG, S. REDD+ policy networks in Brazil: constraints and opportunities for successful policy making. Ecology and Society, Wolfville, v. 19, n. 3, p. 53-70, 2014. GEERTZ, C. After the fact: two countries, four decades, one anthropologist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. GEMENNE, F.; BARNETT, J; ADGER, W.; NEIL, D.; GEOFFRY, D. Climate and security: evidence, emerging risks, and a new agenda. Climate Change, New York, v. 123, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2014. GERMAN, L.; COLFER, C. J. P.; BARROW, E.; KUCHLI, C.; BLASER, J.; WARDOJO, W. Forest Governance and decentralisation in Africa: linking local, regional and global dialogues. London: Earthscan, 2010. 206 GIBBS, G. Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, 1988. GIESSEN, L. Comment to conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature, London, 2012. Disponível em: <http://han.sub.uni-goettingen.de/han/328_0/www. nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7412/full/488454a.htm>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. GIRARDI, G. Aquecimento global e a nova geografia da produção agrícola no Brasil. São Paulo: Embrapa/Cepagri/Unicamp, 2008. GLENNIE, J.; MCKECHNIE, A.; RABINOWITZ, G.; ALI, A. Localising aid: sustaining change in the public, private and civil society sectors. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2013. GLUCK, P.; RAYNER, J.; CASHORE, B. Change in the governance of forest resources. In: MERY, G.; ALFARO, R.; KANNINEN, M.; LABOVIKOV, M. (Ed.). Forest in the global balance: changing paradigms: Helsinki: International Union of Forest Research Organizations, 2005. p. 51-74 (World Series, 17). GODAR, J.; GARDNER, T. A.; TIZADO, E. J.; PACHECO, P. Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Washington, DC, v. 111, n. 43, p. 15591-15596, 2014. GONÇALVES NETO, W. Estado e agricultura no Brasil: política agrícola e modernização econômica brasileira, 1960-1980. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1997. GÖRG, C. Landscape governance: the politics of scale and the natural conditions of places. Geoforum, Oxford, v. 38, p. 954-966, 2007. GOULD, K. Land regularization on agricultural frontiers: the case of northwestern Pete ́n, Guatemala. Land Use Policy, Guildford, v. 23, p. 395-407, 2006. GOULDER, L. H.; PARRY, I. W. H. Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Oxford, v. 2, n. 2, p. 152–174, 2008. GREENPEACE. Eating up the Amazon. Ottho Heldringstraat: Greenpeace International, 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/2/eating-upthe- amazon.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. GREENPEACE. Slaughtering the Amazon. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/slaughteri ng-the-amazon/>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. GREENPEACE. The U.S. connection to illegal logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, 2007. Disponível em: <file:///C:/Users/Jo%C3%A3o/Desktop/report_amazonlogging_us_greenpeace.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. GRUPO DE TRABALHO AMAZÔNICO - GTA. O fim da floresta? a devastação das unidades de conservação e terras indígenas no estado de Rondônia. Porto Velho, 2008. 207 GRUPO PERMANENTE DE TRABALHO INTERMINISTERIAL - GPTI. Plano de ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento na Amazônia legal: segundaa fase 2009- 2010. Brasília: Presidência da República, 2009. GRUPO PERMANENTE DE TRABALHO INTERMINISTERIAL - GPTI. Plano de ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento na Amazônia legal. Brasília: Presidência da República, 2004. GUISO, L.; SAPIENZA, P.; ZINGALES, L. Does culture affect economic outcome? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Nashville, v. 20, n. 2, p. 23-48, 2006. GUNNINGHAM, N.; SINCLAIR, D. Regulatory pluralism: designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law & Policy, Washington, DC, v. 21, p. 49, 1999. GUNNINGHAM, N.; YOUNG, M. D. Toward optimal environmental policy: the case of biodiversity conservation. Ecology Law Quarterly, Berkeley, v. 24, p. 243-296, 1997. GUTBERLET, J. Zoneamento da Amazônia: uma visão crítica. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 16, n. 46, 157-174, set./dez. 2002. HAHN, R. W.; STAVINS, R. N. Economic incentives for environmental protection: integrating theory and practice. The American Economic Review, Nashville, v. 82, n. 2, p. 464-468, 1992. HALL, A. Better RED than dead: paying the people for environmental services in Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, v. 363, p.1925–1932, 2008. HALL, A. The last shall be first: political dimensions of conditional cash transfers in Brazil. Journal of Policy Practice, New York, v. 11, n. 1/2, p. 25-41, 2012. HALL, P. A.; TAYLOR, R. C. R. Political Science and the three institutionalisms. Political Studies, Surrey, v. 44, p. 936–957, 1996. HARDIN, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science: New Series, New York, v. 162, n. 3859, p. 1243-1248, 1968. HARGRAVE, J.; KIS-KATOS, K. Economic causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: a panel data analysis for the 2000s. Environmental Resource Economics, London, v. 54, p. 471-494, 2013. HARVEY, B.; ENSOR, J.; GARSIDE, B.; WOODEND, J.; NAESS, L. O.; CARLILE, L. Social learning in practice: a review of lessons, impacts and tools for climate change. Copenhagen: CGIAR - Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, 2013. (Working Paper, 38) HAYDEN, L. Saving forests with Brazil’s ranchers and farmers: it's possible for economic development and environmental protection to work hand-in-hand. Arlington: The Nature Conservance, 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/ urgentissues/global-warming-climate-change/explore/saving-forests-with-brazils-ranchersand- farmers.xml>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. 208 HECHT, S. B. The sacred cow in the green hell: livestock and forest conversion in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecologist, Cornwall, v. 19, n. 6, p. 229-234, 1989. HELFAND, S. M.; REZENDE,G. C. A agricultura brasileira nos anos 1990: o impacto das reformas de políticas. In: GASQUES, J. G.; CONCEIÇÃO, J. C. P. R. (Org.). Transformações da agricultura e políticas públicas. Brasília: IPEA, 2001. p. 213-243. HEPBURN, C. Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: a review of instrument choice. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford, v. 22, n. 2, p, 226–247, 2006. HIRSCHMANN, W. Profit from the learning curve. Harvard Business Review, Boston, v. 42, p. 125-139, 1964. HOLLING, C. S.; MEFFE, G. K. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, Boston, v. 10, n. 2, p. 328-337, 1996. HUBER, R.; RUITENBEECK, J.; SEROA DA MOTTA, R. Market based instruments for environmental policy making, in Latin America and the Caribbean: lessons from eleven countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Report, 1997. IBGE. Censo agropecuário 2006. Rio de Janeiro, 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/agropecuaria/censoagro/>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. IBGE. Estatísticas das cidades. Rio de Janeiro, 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/topwindow.htm?1>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. IBGE. Produção da Pecuária Municipal. Rio e Janeiro, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2013/>. Acesso em: 2 jan. 2015. IFEGBESAN, A.; PENDLEBURY, S.; ANNEGARN, H. Forest people, two countries and one continent: what empirical connections? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, London, v. 18, n.1, p. 45-56, 2009. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE MEIO AMBIENTE E DE RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS – IBAMA. Nota do IBAMA. Brasília, 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.prpa.mpf.gov.br/news/2010/noticias/Nota_Ibama.pdf/view>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE MINEIRAÇÃO - IBRAN. Produção de níquel no Brasil. Disponível em: <http://www.ibram.org.br/sites/1300/1382/00000043.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA AMBIENTAL DA AMAZÔNIA - IPAM. O aumento no desmatamento na Amazônia em 2013: um ponto fora da curva ou fora de controle? Brasília, 7 jan. 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.socioambiental.org/sites/blog.socioambiental.org/ files/nsa/arquivos/aumento_no_desmatamento_na_amazonia_em_2013_vs_final.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO HUMANITAS UNISINOS - IHU. Fazenda com escravos é controlada por família de Daniel Dantas. 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.ihu.unisinos.br/noticias/ 508351-fazenda-com-escravos-e-controlada-por-familia-de-daniel-dantas->. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO HUMANITAS UNISINOS - IHU. Trabalhador rural é assassinado em fazenda do grupo de Daniel Dantas. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.ihu.unisinos.br/ noticias/522702-trabalhador-rural-e-assassinado-em-fazenda-do-grupo-de-daniel-dantas->. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS - INPE. Estimativa de emissões dos gases do efeito estufa (GEE) por mudanças de cobertura da terra. 2012. Disponível em: http://inpe-em.ccst.inpe.br/>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS - INPE. Monitoramento da cobertura florestal da Amazônia por satélites: sistemas PRODES, DETER, DEGRAD e Queimadas - 2007–2008. São José dos Campos, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.obt.inpe.br/ degrad/>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS – INPE. Monitoramento da cobertura florestal da Amazônia por satélites: sistemas PRODES, DETER, DEGRAD - 2007-2014. São José dos Campos, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.obt.inpe.br>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS - INPE. Projeto Terra Class: mapeamento do uso e cobertura da terra na Amazônia legal brasileira. Brasília, 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.inpe.br/cra/projetos_pesquisas/TerraClass_2012_26nov 2014.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. JACKSON, T. Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Guildford: Sustainable Development Research Network, 2005. JARZABKOWSKI, P. Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, London, v. 25, n. 4, p. 529-560, 2004. JENTOFT, S.; MCCAY, B. J.; WILSON, D. C. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, Surrey, v. 22, n. 4/5, p. 423-436, 1998. JEPPERSON, R. L. Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalismin. In: POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (Ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1991. p. 143-163. JOHNSON, B. Climate change communication: a provocative inquiry into motives, meanings, and means. Risk Analysis, New York, v. 32, n. 6, p. 973–991, Jun. 2012. JOHNSON, C. Uncommon ground: the “poverty of history” in common property discourse. Development and Change, Oxford, v. 35, n. 3, p. 407-434, 2004. KAY, A. The dynamics of public policy: theory and evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2006. KEEN, M.; BROWN, V. A.; DYBALL, R. Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. London: Earthscan, 2005. KISER, L. L.; OSTROM E. The three worlds of action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: OSTROM, E. (Ed.). Strategies of political enquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982. p. 179-222. KOLLMUSS, A.; AGYEMAN, J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, Abingdon, v. 8, p. 239-260, 2002. KORHONEN-KURKI, K.; SEHRING, J.; BROCKHAUS, M.; GREGORIO, M. Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance. Climate Policy, London, v. 14, p. 167-186, 2014. KOZAR, R.; BUCK, L.; BARROW, E.; SUNDERLAND, T.; CATACUTAN, D.; PLANICKA, C.; HART, A.; WILLEMEN, L. Towards viable landscape governance systems: what works? Washington, DC: Eco Agriculture Partners, 2014. (Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Working Paper). LAKATOS, I. Popper on demarcation and induction. In: SCHILPP, P. A. The philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle: Open Court, 1974. p. 241–273. (The Library of Living Philosophers, v. 14). LAMBIN, E. F.; MEYFROIDT, P. Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, Guildford, v. 27, n. 2, p. 108-118, 2010. LANDELL-MILLS, P.; WILLIAMS, G.; DUNCAN, A. Tackling the political barriers to development: the new political economy perspective. Brighton: The Policy Practice, 2007. (Policy Practice Brief, n. 1) LANDES, D. S. The wealth and poverty of nations. New York: Norton and Company, 1998. LAPOLA, D. M.; SCHALDACH, R.; ALCAMO, J.; BONDEAU, A.; KOCH, J.; KOELKING, C.; PRIESS, J. A. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, v. 107, n. 8, p. 3388-3393, 2010. LE TOURNEAU, F. M.; MARCHAND, G.; GREISSING, A.; NASUTI, S.; DROULERS, M.; BURSZTYN, M.; LÉNA, P.; DUBREUIL, V. The DURAMAZ indicator system: a crossdisciplinary comparative tool for assessing ecological and social changes in the Amazon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, London, v. 368, n. 1619, p. 1619, 2013. LEEUW, F. Policy theories, knowledge utilization and evaluation. In: RIST, R. C. (Ed.) Policy evaluation: linking theory to practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995. LEITE, S. P. Estado, padrão de desenvolvimento e agricultura: o caso brasileiro: novas ruralidades, desenvolvimento rural, agricultura, graciliano ramos. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, v. 13, n. 2, 2005. LENTINI, M.; PEREIRA, D.; CELENTANO, D.; PEREIRA, R. Fatos florestais da Amazônia. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2005. LEVI, M. A model, a method and a map: rational choice in comparative analysis. In: LICHBACH, M. I.; ZUCKERMAN, A. C. (Ed.). Comparative politics: rationality, culture and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. p. 19-41. LEWIS, A. The theory of economic growth. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1955. LOPES, E. Fundo Terra Verde: a peça que faltava na virada ambiental de SFX. Belém: The Nature Conservancy, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.tnc.org.br/nossas-historias/ publicacoes/cartilha-fundoterraverde.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. LOVEJOY, T. E. Responsibilities of twenty-first century scientists. Biotropica, Washington, DC, v. 41, n. 5, p. 531, 2009. MACHIAVELLI, N. The prince. Translated by W. K. Marriott. 1908. Disponível em: <https://www.gutenberg.org/files/ 1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm >. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2014. MACINTYRE, A. C. After virtue: a study in moral theory. Chicago: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984. MAHAR, D. J. Frontier development policy in Brazil: a study of Amazonia. New York: Praeger, 1979. MAHONEY, J. Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory and Society, Dordrecht, v. 29, p. 507-48, 2000. MAIA, H.; HARGRAVE, J.; GÓMEZ, J.; RÖPER, M. Avaliação de plano de ação para a prevenção e controle do desmatamento na Amazônia legal: versão preliminar. Brasília: CEPAL/GIZ/IPEA, 2011 MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN J. P. Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. In: RHODES, R. A. W.; BINDER, S.A.; ROCKMAN B. (Ed.): The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 3-20. MARENGO, J. A. Mudanças climáticas globais e efeitos sobre a biodiversidade: caracterização do clima atual e definição das alterações climáticas para o território brasileiro ao longo do século XXI. Brasília: MMA, 2006. MARGULIS, S. Causas do desmatamento na Amazônia brasileira. Brasília: Banco Mundial, 2003. MARIN, A.; BJORKLAND, I. A tragedy of errors? institutional dynamics and land tenure in Finnmark, Norway. International Journal of the Commons, Utrecht, v. 9, n. 1, p. 19-40, 2015. MARKANDYA, A. Economic instruments: accelerating the move from concepts to practical application. In: FOURTH GROUP MEETING ON FINANCIAL ISSUES OF AGENDA 21, Santiago, 1997. Proceedings... London: DPCSD, 1997. p. 221-253. Disponível em: <http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/34312/S9700533_ en.pdf?sequence=1>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2015. 212 MARQUES, J. A.; MALCHER, M. A. (Org.). Procedimentos metodológicos da varredura fundiária. Belém: ITERPA, 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.iterpa.pa.gov.br/ITERPA/ files/cardenos/caderno_procedimentos_metodologicos.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. MAX-NEEF, M. The world on a collision course and the need for a new economy. Contribution to the 2009 royal colloquium. Ambio, Stockholm, v. 39, p. 200-210, 2010. MAY, P. H.; CALIXTO, B.; GEBARA, M. F. REDD+politics in the Media: a case study from Brazil. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research, 2011. (Working Paper, 55). MAY, P. H.; GEBARA, M. F.; LIMA, G.; JORDÃO, C.; NOGUEIRA, P.; GRIEG-GRAN, M. The effectiveness and fairness of the “Ecological ICMS” as a fiscal transfer for biodiversition conservation: a tale of two municipalities in Mato Grosso, Brazil. In: CONFERÊNCIA EUROPÉIA PARA ECONOMIA ECOLÓGICA, 2013. Disponível em: <http://policymix.nina.no/Portals/policymix/Documents/Summaries/May%20et%20al%20201 3%20ICMS-E.pdf >. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2015. MAY, P.; ANDRADE, J.; VIVAN, J.; KAECHELE, K.; GEBARA, M. F.; ABAD, R. Assessment of the role of economic and regulatory instruments in the conservation policymix for the Brazilian Amazon: a coarse grain study. Berlin: Policymix, 2012. (Report 5/2012). Disponível em: <http://policymix.nina.no>. Acesso em: 3 jan. 2015. MCFARLAND, W.; WHITLEY, S.; KISSINGER, G. Subsidies to key commodities driving forest loss Implications for private climate finance. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2003. Disponível em: Disponível em: <http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odiassets/ publications-opinion-files/9577.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. MCGINNIS, M. D. An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, Urbana, v. 39, n. 1, p. 169- 183, 2011. MCNAY, L. Gender and agency: reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2000. MEARNS, K. Behaviour change. In: CLIMATE X CHANGE ANNUAL MEETING, 2012, Edinburgh. Proceeding.... Edinburgh, 2012. MEDINA, G.; POKORNY, B.; CAMPBELL, B. Loggers and development agents exercising power over Amazonian villagers. Development and Change, Oxford, v. 40, n. 4, p. 745-767, 2009. MERT, A. Partnerships for sustainable development as discursive practice:shifts in discourses of environment and democracy. Forest Policy and Economics, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 5-6, p. 326-339, 2009. MERTON, R. K.; FISK, M.; KENDALL, P.L. The focused interview: a manual of problems and procedures. Glencoe: Il Free Press, 1956. MICHAELIS, P. Ökonomische instrumente der umweltpolitik. Heidelberg: Physica- Verlag, 1996. MILL, J. S. Of the stationary state: from principles of political economy. 1848. Book 4, Chapter 4. Disponível em: <http://www.panarchy.org/mill/stationary>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. MITCHELL, C. Case and situation analysis. In: ROMM, R.; FOSTER, P. (Ed.). Case study Method. London: Sage, 2000. p. 234-258. MOREY, D.; MAYBURY, M.; THURAISINGHAM, B. Knowledge management: classic and contemporary works. Boston: MIT Press, 2000. MOSER, S. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process, and future direction. WIREs Climate Change, New York , v. 1, n. 1, p. 31-53, Jan./Feb. 2010. MOSSE, D. The symbolic making of a common property resource: history, ecology and locality in a tank-irrigated landscape in south India. Development and Change, Oxford, v. 28, n. 3, p. 467-504, 1997. MUNHOZ, F; BONANOME, F. Certificação da carne bovina nos supermercados. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.ihu.unisinos.br/noticias/noticias-anteriores/24699-certificacaoda- carne-bovina-nos-supermercados>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. MWANGI, E. Bumbling bureaucrats, sluggish courts and forum-shopping elites. The European Journal of Development Research, London, v. 22, n. 5, p. 715-732, 2010. NEPSTAD, D. C.; STICKLER, C. M.; ALMEIDA, O. T. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology, Boston, v. 20, p. 1595-1603, 2006. NERLICH, B.; KOTEYKO, N.; BROWN, B. Theory and language of climate change communication. WIREs Climate Change, New York, v. 1, n. 1, p. 97-118, , Jan./Feb. 2010. NEVES, E. Diagnóstico da gestão ambiental municipal no estado do Pará: projeto PMV/IMAZON/CLUA. Belém: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, 2013. NOBRE, C. A.; SALAZAR, L. F.; OYAMA, M. Mudanças climáticas e alterações nos biomas da América do Sul até 2100: relatório 6. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2007. NOGUEIRA, J. M.; BORGES, L. H. Incentivos positivos de controle do desmatamento no Brasil. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2012. NORGAARD, R. B. Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. New York: Routledge, 1994. NORTH, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. NUNES, P. C.; VIVAN, J. L. Florestas, sistemas agroflorestais e seus serviços ambientais e econômicos em Juruena-MT. Cuiabá: ADERJUR, 2011. OBERTHÜR, S. E; THOMAS G. (Ed.). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: synergy and conflict among international and EU Policies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. OBSERVATÓRIO DO PLANO ABC. Análise dos recursos do programa ABC: visão regional. Rio de Janeiro, 2014. Disponível em: <https://s3-sa-east-1.amazo naws.com/arquivos.gvces.com.br/arquivos_gvces/arquivos/340/ObsABC_Relatorio2_Analise RecursosRegional_Completo.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2015. ODGAARD, R. Scrambling for land in Tanzania: processes of formalisation and legitimisation of land rights. The European Journal of Development Research, London, v. 14, n. 2, p. 71-88, 2002. OLIVEIRA, A. Ocupação humana. In: SALATI, E.; JUNK, W.J .; SHUBART, E. O. R.; OLIVEIRA, A. E. (Ed.). Amazônia: desenvolvimento, integração, ecologia, CNPq. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1983. p. 144-327. OLIVEIRA, C.; PINTO, C.; MARQUES, M.; SANTANA, R.; BARCELOS, R.; SABLLAYROLLES, P. (Coord.). Adequação ambiental e políticas públicas para a agricultura familiar no Alto Xingu. São Felix do Xingu: Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Agricultura Familiar do Alto Xingu, 2012. OLIVIER DE SARDAN, J. P. The delivery state in Africa: interface bureaucrats, professional cultures and the bureaucratic mode of governance. In: OLIVIER DE SARDAN, J. P.; BIERSCHENK, T. (Ed.). States at work: the dynamics of African Bureaucracies. Boston: Brill, 2014. p. 399-430. OOSTEN, C. J. Restoring landscapes - governing place: a learning approach to forest landscape restoration. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, New York, v. 32, n. 7, p. 659-676, 2013. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT – OECD. Recommendation of the council on the use of economic instruments in promoting the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. 2004. Disponível em: <http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=50& InstrumentPID=47&Lang=en&Book=False>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2015. ORTNER, S. B. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Cambridge, v. 26, n. 1, p. 126-166, 1984. ORTS, E. W. Reflexive environmental law. Northwestern University Law Review, Chicago, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1227-1340, 1995. OSTROM, E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Washington, DC, v. 104, n. 39, p.15181-15187, 2007. OSTROM, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, Nashville, v. 100, n. 3, p. 641-672, 2010. OSTROM, E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. OSTROM, E. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005. OSTROM, E.; BURGER, J.; FIELD, C. B.; NORGAARD, R. B.; POLICANSKY. D. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, New York, v. 284, p. 278- 282, 1999. OSTROM, E.; OSTROM V. The Quest for meaning in public choice. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, New York, v. 63, p. 105-147, 2004. PACHECO, P. Actor and frontier types in the Brazilian Amazon: assessing interactions and outcomes associated with frontier expansion. Geoforum, Oxford, v. 43, n. 4, p. 864-874, 2012. PACHECO, P. Agrarian reform in the Brazilian Amazon: its implications for land distribution and deforestation. World Development, Oxford, v. 37, p. 1337-1347, 2009. PADOCH, C.; BRONDIZIO, E.; COSTA, S.; PINEDO- VASQUEZ, M.; SEARS, R. R.; SIQUEIRA, A. Urban forest and rural cities: multi- sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecology and Society, Wolfville, v. 13, n. 2, p. 2, 2008. PAGE, B. Naked Power: women and the social production of water in anglophone Cameroon. In: COLES, A.; WALLACE, T. (Ed.). Gender, water and development. Oxford: Berg. 2005. p. 57-76. PAHL-WOSTL, C. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, Guildford, v. 19, n. 3, p. 354-365, 2009. PANAYOTOU, T. Economic instruments for environmental management and sustainable development. Harvard: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University, 1994. (Environmental Economics Series Paper, 16) PARÁ. Ministério Público Federal. Procuradoria da República do Pará. Caso carne legal. Disponível em: <https://www2.mppa.mp.br/sistemas/gcsubsites/upload/41/Apresenta% C3%83%C2%A7ao%20MPF%20-%20Workshop%20-%2028_10_11%284%29.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. PARÁ. Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Sustentabilidade do Estado do Pará. Cadastro ambiental rural. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.sema.pa.gov.br/servicos/car/>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. PARKER, L.; BLODGETT, J. Global climate change: three policy perspective. In: Perspectives. In: CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE REPORT FOR CONGRESS, 2008. Disponível em: < http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/98-738.pdf >. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2015. PATIL, N. P. Role of education in social change ismailsaheb mulla law college, Satara, Maharashtra, India. International Educational E-Journal, Nova Deli, v. 1, n. 2, p. 2277- 2456, Jan./Mar. 2012. 216 PELLETIER, N. Environmental sustainability as the first principle of distributive justice: towards an ecological communitarian normative foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 69, p. 1887-1894, 2010. PENNINGTON, M. Elinor Ostrom: common pool resources and the classical liberal tradition In: OSTROM, E. The future of the commons: beyond market failure and government regulation. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, 2012. Chap. 1, p. 21-47 PETERS, I.; CHRISTOPLOS, I.; FUNDER, M.; FRIIS-HANSEN, E.; PAIN, A. Understanding institutional change: a review of selected literature for the climate change and rural Institutions Research Programme. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2012. (DIIS Working Paper, 12). PHELPS, J.; CARRASCO, L. R.; WEBB, E. L.; KOH, L. P.; PASCUAL, U. Agricultural intensification escalates future conservation costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, v. 110, n. 19, p. 7601-7606, 2013. PHILLIPS, N.; LAWRENCE, T. B.; HARDY, C. Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, Mississippi, v. 29, n. 4, p. 635-652, 2004. PHILLIPS, T. Invisible but all too real: the illegal roads speeding destruction of the rainforest. The Guardian. 2007 Disponível em: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/apr/ 21/ brazil.conservationandendangeredspecies>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. PIAGET, J. Seis estudos de psicologia. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1967. PIERSON, P. Politics in time: history, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. PIERSON, P. When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, Princeton, v. 45, n. 4, p. 595-628, Jul. 1993. PIKETTY, M. G.; BASTOS DA VEIGA, J.; TOURRAND, J. F.; ALVES, A. M.; POCCARD-CHAPUIS, N. R.; THALES, M. Determinantes da expansão da pecuária na Amazônia oriental: conseqüências para as políticas publicas. Cadernos de Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasília, v. 22, n. 1, p. 221–234, 2005. PINTO, L. F. O latifúndio de Dantas no Pará. 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.acessa.com/gramsci/?page=visualizar&id=990>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. PIRARD, R.; TREYER, S. Agriculture and deforestation: what role should REDD+ and public support policies play? New York: Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations, 2010. (Working Paper, n. 10). PIRES, M. O.; ORTEGA V. G. O cadastro ambiental rural na Amazônia. Brasília: Conservação Internacional, 2013. POCHMANN, M. Qual desenvolvimento? oportunidades e dificuldades do Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: Publisher Brazil, 2009. POKORNY, B.; JONG, W.; GODAR, J.; PACHECO, P.; JOHNSON, J. From large to small: reorienting rural development policies in response to climate change, food security and poverty. Forest Policy and Economics, Amsterdam, v. 36, p. 52-59, 2013. POLANYI, K. A grande transformação: as origens de nossa época. Tradução de Fanny Wrobel. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1980. POLANYI, M. The logic of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951. POLSKI, M.; OSTROM, E. An institutional framework for policy analysis and design in workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Indianápolis: Indiana University, 1999. (Working Paper, W98-27). Disponível em: <https://mason.gmu.edu/~mpolski/documents/ PolskiOstromIAD.pdf >. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2015. POTEETE, A. Levels, scales, linkages, and other ‘multiples’ affecting natural resources. International Journal of the Commons, Utrecht, v. 6, p. 134-150, 2012. POTEETE, A. R.; OSTROM, E. Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: the role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, Oxford, v. 35, n. 3, p. 437- 461, Jun. 2004. POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. PRAGER, K. Understanding behaviour change: how to apply theories of behaviour change to SEWeb and related public engagement activities. May 2012. Disponível em: <http://www.environment.scotland.gov.uk//media/16539/Understanding-Behaviour- Change.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. PRAGER, K.; OSTHUMUS, H. Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil conservation practices in Europe. In: NAPIER, T. (Ed.). Human dimensions of soil and water conservation: a global perspective. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010. p. 203- 223. PRATES, R. C. O desmatamento desigual na Amazônia brasileira: sua evolução, suas causas e consequências sobre o bem-estar. 2008. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Escola Superior de Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo. PRIMMER, E.; SIMILA, J.; BARTON, D.; SCHROTER-SCHLAACK, C. Guidelines for the analysis of institutions shaping biodiversity policy instrument applicability. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 2011. Disponível em: <http://policymix.nina.no/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/Download.aspx?Command=C ore_Download&EntryId=864&language=en-US&PortalId=51&TabId=3736>. Acesso em: 3 jan. 2015. PUTMAN, R. Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. QUIGGIN, J. Common property, equality and development. World Development, Oxford, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1123–38, 1993. RAYMOND, C. M.; FAZEY, I.; REED, M. S.; STRINGER L. C., ROBINSON, G. M.; EVELY, A. C. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management: from products to processes. Journal of Environmental Management, London, v. 91, p. 1766-1777, 2010. RECKWITZ, A. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, London, v. 5, n. 2, p. 243-63, 2002. REED J.; DEAKIN L.; SUNDERLAND T. What are integrated landscape approaches and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: a systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, London, v. 4, n. 2, p. 2-7, 2014. REED, M. S.; EVELY, A. C.; CUNDILL, G.; FAZEY, I.; GLASS, J.; LAING, A.; NEWIG, J.; PARRISH, B.; PRELL, C.; RAYMOND. C.; STRINGER, L. C. What is social learning? Ecology and Society, Wolfville, v. 15, n. 4, p. R1, 2010. REIMBERG, M. MPF cobra Santa Bárbara por 51 mil hectares de área desmatada. Repórter Brasil, São Paulo, 26 set. 2009. Disponível em: <http://reporterbrasil.org.br/2009/06/mpfcobra- santa-barbara-por-51-mil-hectares-de-area-desmatada/>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. REITZE JR., A. W. A century of pollution control: what's worked? what's failed? what might work? Environmental Law, Oxford, v, 21, p. 1549-1946, 1991. RENN, O. Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan, 2008. RIBEIRO, N. F. A geopolítica da globalização e o futuro da soberania sobre a Amazônia. In: ______. A questão geopolítica da Amazônia: da soberania difusa à soberania restrita. Brasília: Senado Federal, 2005. RIBOT, J. C.; AGRAWAL, A.; LARSON, A. M. Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development, Oxford, v. 34, n. 11, p. 1864-1886, 2006. RIBOT, J. C.; AGRAWAL, A.; LARSON, A. M. Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments re-appropriate forest resources. World Development, Oxford, v. 34, n. 11, p. 1864-1886, 2006. RIBOT, J. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2002. RING, I.; SCHRÖTER-SCHLAACK, C. (Ed.). Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 2011. (POLICYMIX Report, n. 2). Disponível em: <http://policymix.nina.no/Portals/policymix/POLICYMIX%20Report _No%202_2011.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015. ROBINSON, B. E.; HOLLAND, M. B.; NAUGHTON-TREVES, L. Does secure land tenure save forests? a review of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Copenhagen: GIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security 2011. (Working Paper, 7) ROCKSTRÖM, J.; STEFFEN, W.; NOONE, K.; PERSSON, A.; CHAPIN, F. S.; LAMBIN, E. F.; LENTON, T. M.; SCHEFFER, M.; FOLKE, C.; SCHELLNHUBER, H. J.; NYKVIST, B.; WIT, C. A.; HUGHES, T.; LEEUW, S.; RODHE, H.; SÖRLIN, S.; SNYDER, P. K.; COSTANZA, R.; SVEDIN, U.; FALKENMARK, M.; KARLBERG, L.; CORELL, R. W.; FABRY, V. J.; HANSEN, J.; WALKER, B.; LIVERMAN, D.; RICHARDSON, K.; CRUTZEN, P.; FOLEY J. A. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, London, v. 461, p. 472-475, 2009. RYAN, G. W.; BERNARD, H. R. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, New York, v. 15, n. 1, p. 85-109, 2003. SABOURIN, E.; Teixeira, O. A. (Ed.). Planejamento e desenvolvimento dos territórios rurais: conceitos, controvérsias e experiências. Petrolina: EMBRAPA, 2002. SAKAMOTO, L. MPF processa bancos por financiarem o desmatamento. O Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1 abr. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.estadao.com.br/ estadaodehoje/20110401/not_ imp700190,0 php>. Acesso em: 8 fev. 2015. SANDERSON, I. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, London, v. 80, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2002. SANTOS, A. D.; ALEIXO, N.; MIRANDA K. Diagnóstico institucional: capacidades e limites da sociedade civil de São Félix do Xingu para o ordenamento territorial e manejo dos recursos naturais. Belem: Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil, 2009 SARASON, S. Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press, 1996. SAYER, A. Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. SCHAEFFER, R. (Org). Climate change and energy security. Rio de Janeiro: World Bank Energy Week, 2008. (Technical Report. PPE/COPPE/UFRJ) SCHATZKI, T. R. Introduction: practice theory. In: SCHATZKI, T. R.; KNORR CETINA, K.; VON SAVIGNY, E. (Ed.). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge: London, 2001.p. 1-14. SCHATZKI, T.; KNORR-CETINA, K.; VON SAVIGNY E. (Ed.). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge, 2000. SCHELLNHUBER, H. J.; CRUTZEN, P. J.; CLARK, W. C.; HUNT, J. Earth system analysis for sustainability. Environment, Washington, DC, v. 47, p. 11-25, 2005. SCHMINK, M.; WOOD, C. Contested frontiers in Amazonia. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992. SCHNEGG, M.; LINKE, T. 2015. Living institutions: sharing and sanctioning among pastoralists in Namibia. World Development, Oxford, v. 68, p. 205-2014, 2015. SCHNEIDER, C.; COUDEL, E.; CAMMELLI, F.; SABLAYROLLES, P. Small-scale farmers’ needs to end deforestation: insights for REDD+ in São Felix do Xingu (Pará, Brazil). International Forestry Review, Oxford, v.17, p. S1, 2015. SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995. SEARCHINGER, T.; HEIMLICH, R.; HOUGHTON, R. A.; DONG, F.; ELOBEID, A.; FABIOSA, J.; TOKGOZ, S.; HAYES, D.; YU, T. H. Use of U.S: croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science, New York, v. 319, p. 1238-1240, 2008. SEHRING, J. Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in Post-Soviet Water Governance. Water Alternatives, London, v. 2, n. 1, p. 61-81, 2009. SEN, A. K. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Washington, DC, v. 6, n. 4 p. 317-344, 1977. SEN, A. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002. SEN, A. Rights and capabilities. In: ______. Resources, values and development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. p. 307-324. SEROA DA MOTTA, R.; RUITENBEEK, J.; HUBER, R. Uso de instrumentos econômicos na gestão ambiental na América Latina e Caribe: lições e recomendações. Brasília: IPEA, 1996. (Texto para Discussão, 440) SERVIÇO FLORESTAL BRASILEIRO - SFB; INSTITUTO DO HOMEM E MEIO AMBIENTEDA AMAZÔNIA. A atividade madeireira na Amazônia brasileira: produção, receita e mercados. Belém, 2010. SHOOTER, A. The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. SHORT, J. Governing without commands or controls: self-regulation as regulatory reform and justification. Berkeley: University of California, 2007. Disponível em: <http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/culture/papers/short07.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. SHOVE, E.; PANTZAR, M.; WATSON, M. The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage, 2012. SIEBENHÜNER, B. Homo sustinens: towards a new conception of humans for the science of sustainability. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 32, n. 1, p. 15-25, 2000. SILVA NETO, M. A. Políticas públicas, propaganda e movimentos sociais na Amazônia do período militar. In: SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DE HISTÓRIA, 27., Natal, 2013. Anais... Natal: ANPUH, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.snh2013.anpuh.org/resources/anais/ 27/1394142879_ARQUIVO_PAPER.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. SIMIONATO, M. Matadores espalham medo em cidade do PA. Folha de São Paulo, São Paulo, 21 set. 2003. Disponível em: <http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/brasil/ ult96u53627.shtml>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. SIMON, H. A. Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Free Press, 1976. SINCLAIR, D. Self-regulation versus command and control? beyond false dichotomies. Law & Policy, Washington, DC, v, 19, n. 4, p. 529-559, 1997. 221 SMERALDI, R.; MAY, P. A hora da conta: pecuária, Amazônia e conjuntura. São Paulo: Amigos da Terra -Amazônia Brasileira, 2009. STERN, P. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, Malden, v. 50, p. 65-84, 2000. STERNER, T. Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Washington, DC: RFF Press, 2003. STOKKE, O. S. The interplay of international regimes: putting effectiveness theory to work. Oslo: Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2001. (Report, 14) SULLIVAN, S. Banking nature? the spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode: a Radical Journal of Geography, Worcester, v. 45, n. 1, p. 198-217, 2012. SWITKES, G. A pedra fundamental da IIRSA. In: SWITKES, G.; BONILHA, P. Águas turvas: alertas sobre as conseqüências de barrar o maior afluente do amazonas. São Paulo: International Rivers, 2008. TELLES DO VALLE, R. S. CAR pra Q? Brasília: Instituto Socio-Ambiental, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.socioambiental.org/pt-br/blog/blog-do-ppds/car-para-que> Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015. TELLES DO VALLE, R. S. Saindo do quadrado: propostas para tentar dinamizar o mercado de cotas de reserva ambiental. Brasília: Instituto Sócio-Ambiental, 2013. THAULT, A.; MICOL, L. Transparência da informação florestal em Mato Grosso: avaliação e recomendações. Cuiabá: Instituto Centro de Vida, 2008. THE ECONOMICS OF ECOSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY - TEEB. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. United Kingdom, 2010 THELEN, K. A historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, Palo Alto, v. 2, p. 369-404, 1999. THOMPSON, M. J. J.; LAVER-BARDBURY, C.; AYRES, M.; LE POIDEVIN, E.; MEAD, S.; DODDS, C.; PSYCHOGIOU, L.; BITSAKOU, P.; DALEY, D.; WEEKS, A.; BROTMAN, L. M.; ABIKOFF, H.; THOMPSON, P.; SONUGA-BARKE, E. J. S. A smallscale randomized controlled trial of the revised New Forest parenting programme for preschoolers with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, London, v. 18, p. 605-616, 2009. TIETENBERG, H. T. Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation. Review of Economic Policy, Oxford, v. 6, n. 1, p. 17-33, 1998. TOMASELLO, M.; MELIS, A. P.; TENNIE, C.; WYMAN, E.; HERRMANN, E. Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: the interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, Chicago, v. 53, n. 6, p. 673-692, Dec. 2012. 222 TONI, F.; PACHECO, P. Gestão ambiental descentralizada: em estudo comparativo de três municípios da Amazônia Brasileira. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2005. (Série Estudos, 6) TONIOLO, M. A.; CORTEZ, R.; GARCIA, E. Curso introdutório sobre mudanças climáticas e florestas. Belém: The Nature Conservancy, 2013. (Desenvolvimento de material didático ou instrucional - Manual de curso para comunidades locais). TRESS, B.; TRESS, G. Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, Amsterdam, v. 57 p. 143-157, 2001. TRIANDIS, H. Interpersonal behaviou. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1977. TURAGA, R. M. R.; HOWARTH, R. B; BORSUK, M. E. Pro-environmental behavior. rational choice meets moral motivation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, v. 1185, p. 1211-1224, 2010. TURNER, E. R. On the cusp of restoration: science and society. Restoration Ecology, Malden, v. 13, p. 165-173, 2005. TURNER, J. C.; BROWN, R. Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In: TAJFEL, H. (Ed.). Dierentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology or intergroup relations. San Diego: Academic Press, 1978. p. 201-234 TURNHOUT, E.; BLOOMFIELD, B.; HULME, M.; VOGEL, J.; WYNNE, B. Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature, London, v. 488, n. 7412, p. 454-455, 2012. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME - UNEP. Economic instruments in biodiversity: related multilateral environmental agreements. 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.unep.ch/etu/etp/events/Economic_Instruments/ EIMEAWorkingPaper.doc>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2015. UNSWORTH, S. What’s politics got to do with it?: why donors find it so hard to come to terms with politics, and why this matters. Journal of International Development, Chichester, v. 21, n. 6, p. 883-894, 2009. UPTON, C. Custom and Contestation: Land Reform in Post-Socialist Mongolia. World Development, Oxford, v. 37, n. 8, p. 1400-1410, 2009. VAN BOMMEL, S.; RÖLING, N.; AARTS, N.; TURNHOUT, E. Social learning for solving complex problems: a promising solution or wishful thinking? a case study of multi-actor negotiation for the integrated management and sustainable use of the Drentsche Aa area in the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, New York, v. 19, n. 6, p. 400-412, 2009. VAN DER HEIJDEN, J. Institutional layering: a review of the use of the concept. Politics, New York, v. 31, n. 1, p. 9-18, 2011. VAN DER KOOIJ, S.; ZWARTEVEEN, M.; KUPER, M. The material of the social: the mutual shaping of institutions by irrigation technology and society in Seguia Khrichfa, Morocco. International Journal of the Commons, Utrecht, v. 9, n. 1, p. 129-150, mar. 2015. ISSN 1875-0281. 223 VAN GOSSUM, P.; ARTS, B.; VERHEYEN, K. Smart regulation”: can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands? Forest Policy and Economics, Amsterdam, v. 16, p. 23-34, 2012. VATN, A. Institutions and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005. VATN, A.; VEDELD, P. Getting ready! a study of nationalgovernance structures for REDD+. Noragric: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2011. (Noragric Report, 39). VEIGA, J. B.; POCCARD-CHAPUIS, R.; TOURRAND, J. F. Caracterization and livestock viability in family agriculture of eastern Brazilian Amazon. In: TOURRAND, J. F.; VEIGA, J. B. (Ed.). Viabilidade de sistemas agropecuários na agricultura familiar da Amazônia. Belém: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, 2006. p. 17-63. VENKATRAJA, B.; INDIRA, M. Role of education in social development: an empirical analysis. Madhya Pradesh Journal of Social Sciences, Chicago, v. 16, n. 1, Jun. 2011. VENTURA, E. C. F. Dinâmica de institucionalização de práticas sociais: estudo da responsabilidade social no campo das organizações bancárias. 2005. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) - Fundação Getúlio, Rio de Janeiro. VIEIRA, I.; VEIGA J.; AGUIAR, A.; GAVINA, J. O papel da pecuária na evolução da fronteira: relatório Geoma. São Paulo: Embrapa, 2010. WACQUANT, L. Carnal connections: on embodiment, membership and apprenticeship. Qualitative Sociology, New York, v. 28, n. 4, p. 445–71, 2005. WARDELL, D. A.; LUND, C. Governing access to forests in northern Ghana: micro-politics and the rents of non-enforcement. World Development, Oxford, v. 34, n. 11, p. 1887-1906, 2006. WARING, T. M. New evolutionary foundations: theoretical requirements for a science of sustainability. Ecological Economics, Amsterdam, v. 69, p. 718-730, 2010. WATTS, J. D.; PIERCE COLFER, C. J. The governance of tropical landscapes. In: PIERCE COLFER, C. J.; PFUND, J. L. (Ed.). Collaborative governance of tropical landscapes. Earthscan: Center for International Forestry Research, 2011. WEBER, M. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Routledge, 1905. WEICK, K. E.; SUTCLIFFE, K. M.; OBSTFELD, D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, Providence, v. 16, p. 409–421, 2005. WEINSTEIN, B. The Amazon rubber boom. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1983. WHALEY, L.; WEATHERHEAD, E. K. An integrated approach to analyzing (adaptive) comanagement using the “politicized” IAD framework. Ecology and Society, Wolfville, v. 19, n. 1, p. 10-23, 2014. WHITTINGTON, R. Learning more from failure: practice and process. Organization Studies, London, v. 27, p. 1903-1906, Dec. 2006. 224 WILSON, A. Power in practice: adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society. New York: John Wilson and Sons Publishing, 2001. WINKEL, G. Foucault in the forests: a review of the use of ‘Foucauldian’ concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, Amsterdam, v. 16, p. 81-92, 2012. WONGBUSARAKUM, S.; MADEIRA, E. M.; HARTANTO, H. Strengthening the social impacts of sustainable landscapes programs: a practitioner’s guidebook to strengthen and monitor human well-being outcomes. Arlington: The Nature Conservancy, 2014. YOUNG, C. E. F.; QUEIROZ, J.; ROCHA, E. Relatório de pesquisa: avaliação dos critérios de sustentabilidade dos financiamentos apoiados pelos fundos constitucionais brasileiros. In: ENCONTRO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA ECOLÓGICA, 8., 2009, Cuiabá. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: CEPAL, 2009. YOUNG, O. R. The Institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002. YOUNG, O. R.; AGRAWAL, A.; KING, L. A.; SAND, P. H.; UNDERDAL, A.; WASSON, M. Institutional dimensions of global environmental change (IDGEC): science plan. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, 1999. (IHDP Report, 16).pt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqSociologiapt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqSociologiapt_BR
Appears in Collections:Doutorado em Ciências Sociais em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2015 - Maria Fernanda Gebara.pdf11.76 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.