logo RIMA
logo UFRRJ

  1. Repositório de Múltiplos Acervos da UFRRJ
  2. Teses e Dissertações
  3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia - Ciência do Solo
  4. Mestrado em Agronomia - Ciência do Solo
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/26424
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, Jeferson Luiz-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-24T16:40:29Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-24T16:40:29Z-
dc.date.issued1995-02-17-
dc.identifier.citationFERRARI, Jefferson Luiz. Avaliação da sensibilidade estomatica como indicador de tolerancia a seca em duas cultivares de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). 1995. 143 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia - Ciência do Solo) - Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Itaguaí, 1995.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/26424-
dc.description.abstractO objetivo do presente experimento foi o de estudar de forma detalhada o comportamento estomático em plantas de feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), não associadas simbioticamente para fixação de N2. Este estudo foi conduzido a campo, em plantas normalmente irrigadas ou dependentes de chuvas, ocorrendo estresse hídrico durante a fase vegetativa(V4), até o início da fase reprodutiva(início da floração, R5) e, posteriormente, durante o enchimento de vagens (R8). Para tal foi instalado um experimento, no campo experimental do Departamento de Fitotecnia da U.F.R.R.J.(23o 41’ L. S.; 43o 41’ Long W.), Km 47 da Antiga Rodovia Rio-São Paulo. O desenho experimental foi disposto em faixas, com duas cultivares(XODÓ e CNF-480), submetidas a dois tratamentos: irrigação e não irrigação, disposto com 3 repetições ao acaso. A irrigação foi aplicada toda vez que o YH atingiu -0,2 MPa, monitorado por psicômetro de solo. Durante os períodos onde ocorreu déficit hídrico, foram medidos diariamente os seguintes parâmetros: YH do solo, WH da folha mediana, condutância estomática e intensidade luminosa em cada amostragem. Durante o estádio V4.4 efetuou-se um monitoramento horário dos parâmetros acima mencionados. No final do experimento foram avaliados os componentes de produção: número de vagens, número de grãos e peso de grãos por planta. As principais conclusões foram: a ocorrência da deficiência hídrica reduziu o WH da folha, a condutância estomática e todos os componentes de produção, exceto o no de vagens/planta. Plantas da cultivar XODÓ sofreram reduções de 30,1% e 42,6% no número de grãos/planta e peso de grãos/planta, respectivamente. Enquanto, na cultivar CNF-480, o efeito da deficiência hídrica nestes componentes de produção foram, respectivamente, 44,1% e 55,9%. A melhor estabilidade aparente de produção apresentada pela cultivar XODÓ, pode ser devido a uma menor diminuição do YH foliar durante o estresse hídrico, provavelmente devido a um maior controle de abertura estomática.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropt_BR
dc.subjectPhaseolus vulgaris L.pt_BR
dc.subjectpotencial hídrico do solo - da folhapt_BR
dc.subjectirrigaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectcomponentes de produçãopt_BR
dc.subjectcontínuo solo-planta-atmosfera(CSPA)pt_BR
dc.subjectSoil-leaf water potentialpt_BR
dc.subjectirrigationpt_BR
dc.subjectyield componentspt_BR
dc.subjectsoil-plant-atmosphere continuum(SPAC)pt_BR
dc.titleAvaliação da sensibilidade estomática como indicador de tolerância a seca em duas cultivares de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of stomatal sensitivity as an indicator of drought tolerance in two common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivarsen
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
dc.description.abstractOtherThe purpose of this experiment was to study in a particular way the stomata behavior in plants of Phaseolus vulgaris L. not symbiotically associate to fixing of N2. This stutly was conduct to field, in. plants normaly irrigated or dependent of rain, occuring temporary stress during the vegetative stage(V4), until the start of the reproduction stage(flowering, R5) and, later, during fhe pod-filling(R8). For this an experiment was installed at the experimental campus of Crop Science Fitotecnia Department from U.F.R.R.J. (239 41’ L. S.; 43o 41’ Long W.), Km 47, Old highway Rio-São Paulo. The experimental design was disposed in strips, with two cultivars (XODÓ and CNF-480) subdued in two treatments: irrigation and not irrigation, with three random repetitions. The irrigation was applied the soil water potential reached -2,0 MPa, measured by a soi1 psycrometer. During the periods where happened water deficit the following soil-plant-water indicators were mea WH,(soil water potential), WH f water potential), stomatal conductance and light intensity in each sample data. During the V.4.4-stage a dialy monitoring in hour-interval of these indicators was made. At the end of the experiment were avaliated the classic yield components: pod number, grain number and grain weigh per plant. The major considerat ions were: the ocurrence of water deficit during culture cycle resulted in decrease the YHf, the Stomatic conductance and all the yield components, except the number of pods per Plant(on the average of the two cultivars), The cultivar XODÓ endured yield reduction of 30,1 and 42,6% in grain and weigh number per plant basis respectively. Anotherway, in the CNF-480 cultivar, the effect of the water stress in these yield components were 41,1 and 55,9% respectively. The best apparrent yield stability showed by cultivar XODÓ, can be due to a less reduction of [QLH during the water deficit period, probably due to a bigger control of stomatal opening.en
dc.contributor.advisor1Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra-
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0160231679600890pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra-
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0160231679600890pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Jacob Neto, Jorge-
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6508017274417976pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Pimentel, Carlos-
dc.contributor.referee3IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-7749pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6405553451083267pt_BR
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5663-6428pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5213847780149836pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Agronomiapt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia - Ciência do Solopt_BR
dc.relation.referencesACEVEDO, E.; FERERES, E.; HSIAO, T. C.; HENDERSON, D. W., 1979. Diurnal growth trends, water potential and osmotic adjustment of maize and sorghum leaves in the field. Plant Physiology, 64:476-80. ACEVEDO, E.; HSIAO, T. C.; HENDERSON, D. W., 1971. Immediate and subsequent growt h responses of maize leaves to changes in wate status. Plant Physiology, 48:631-6. ACKERSON, R. C. & HEBERT, R. R., 198 1. Osmoregulation in cotton in response to water stress. I . Alterations in photosynthesis, leaf conductance, translocation, and ultrastructure, Plant Physiology, 67:484-8. ALMEIDA, A. A. DE; LOPES, N. F.; OLIVA, M. A.; BARROS, R. S., 1988. Dose de nitrogênio e densidade de luz no crescimento do feijoeiro e na conversão da energia solar. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 23(8):849-59. ANÁLISES dos principais produtos. Agroanalysis, Rio de Janeiro, 33(2):36-55, fevereiro, 1989. ANUÁRIO Estatístico do Brasil. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, V.53, p.1-1 - 8-30. 1993. BENSEN, R. J.; BOYER, J. S.; MULLET, J. E., 1988. Water deficit-induced changes in abscisic acid; growth, polysomes, and translatable RNA in soybean hypocotyls. Plant Physiology, 88:289-94. BERG, V. S. & HSIAO, T. C., 1986. Solar tracking: Light avoidance induced by water stress in leaves of kidney bean seedlings in the field. Crop Science, 26(5):980-6. BERGAMASCHI, H.; VIEIRA, H. J.; ANGELOCCI, L. R.; OMETTO, J. C.; BRUNINI, O., 1991. Efeito de variáveis micrometeorológicas e disponibilidade hídrica no solo sobre resistência estomática à difusão gasosa em feijoeiro. Turrialba, 41(4):445-51. BERGAMASCHI, H.; VIEIRA, H. J.; OMETTO, J. C.; ANGELOCCI, L. R. e LIBARDI, P. 1., 1988. Deficiência hídrica em feijoeiro. 1 Análise de crescimento e fenologia. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 23(7):733-43. BLACK, C. R. & SQUIRE, C. R., 1979. Effecto of atmosphere saturation deficit on the stomatal conductance on Pearl millet (Pennisetum Typhoideum S. e H.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 30:935-45. 110 BLUM, A., 1974. Genotypic response in sorghum to drought stress. I Response to soil moisture stress. Crop Science, 14:361-4. BOYER, J. S., 1970 a. Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean. Plant Physiology, 46:236-9. BOYER, J. S., 1970 b. Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology, 46:233-5. BOYER, J. S., 1971 a. Nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis in sunflower at low leaf water potential and high light intensities. Plant Physiology, 48:532-6. BOYER, J. S., 1971 b. Recovery of photosynthesis in sunflower after a period of low leaf water potential. Plant Physiology, 47:816-20. BOYER, J., 1978. Water deficits and plant growth. In: T. T. Kozlowski (Editor), Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol. 4. Academic Press. New York, p. 153-90. BOYER, J. S., 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science, 218:443-8. l 1. 1 BOYER, J. S.; CAVALIERE, A. J.; SCHULZE, E. D., 1985. Control of the rate of cell enlargement: excision, Wall relaxation, and growth induced water potentials. Planta, 163:527-43. BOYER, J. S.; JOHNSON, R. R.; SAUPE, S. G., 1980. Afternoon water deficits and grain fields in old and new soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 72:981-6;. BOYER, J. S. & Mc PHERSON, H. C., 1975. Physiology of water deficits in areal crops. Advances in Agronomy, 27: l-23. BRAY, R. A. & ZEEVAART, J. A. D., 1986. Transport of ABA apoplastic. Plant Physiology, 80(1):105-10. BRIGGS, L. J. & SHANTZ, H. L., 1914. Relative water requirement of plants. Journal of Agriculture Reserach, 3:1-63. BROWN, K. W.; JORDAN, W. R.; THOMAS, J. C., 1976. Water stress induced alteration in the stomatal response to lea water potential. plant physiology, 37:1-5. BURCJI, G. J.; SMITH, R. C. G.; MASON, W. K., 1978. Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. II. Crop evaporat ion, soil water depletion and root distribuition. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 5: 169-77. 1. I 2 CAIXETA, T. J., 1978. Irrigação do feijoeiro. Informe Agropecuário, 4(46):36-40. CARLSON, R. E.; MOMEM, N. N.; ARJMAND, O.; SHAW, R. H., 1979. Leaf conductance and leaf-water potential relationships for two soybeans cultivars grown uncler controlled irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 71:321-5. CASTONGUAY, Y. & III MARKHART, A. H., 1992. Leaf gas exchange in water-stressed common bean and tepary bean. Crop Science, 33.980-6. CHAVES, M. M., 1991. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 42:1-16. CLELAND, R., 1967. A dual role of turgor pressure in auxin-induced cell elongation in Avena coleoplites Planta, 77:182-91. CLELAND, R., 1971. Cell wall extension. Annual Review Plant Physiology, 22:197-222. CORNISH, K. & ZEEVAART, J. A. D., 1985. Abscisic acid accumulation by roots of Xanthium strumarium L. and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill in relation to water stress. Plant Physiology, 79(3):653-8. CORNISH, K. & ZEEVAART, J. A. D., 1986. Abscisic Acid accumulation by in situ and isolated guard cells of Pisum sativum L. and Vicia faba L. in relation to water stress. Plant Physiology, 81(4):1017-21. CORTES, P. M. & SINCLAIR, T. R., 1986. Water relations of field-grown soybean under drought. Crop. Science, 26(5):993-8. COUTO, L., 1979. Effects of water stress on growth, reproductive developmen t, dry matter partitioning and yeld components of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the field. Dissertation abstracts International, 39(12):56-95. CRUZ, J. L.; RAMALHO, M. A. P.; MARTINS, L. A. e PELACAN I. C. R., 1993. Relação entre rendimento, componentes primários de rendimento e parâmetros de enchimento dos grãos de feijoeiro. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, 5(2):159-62. CUTLER, J. M.; SHAIIAN, K. W.; STEPONKUS, P. L., 1980. Influence of water deficits and osmotic adjustment on leaf elongation in rice. Crops Science, 20:314-8. DA COSTA, R. C. L.; LOPES, N. F.; OLIVA, M. A. e DE BARROS, N. F., 1988. Efeito da água e do nitrogênio sobre a fotossíntese, respiração e resistência estomática em Phaseolus vulgaris. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 23(12):1371-9. 112 DAI, Z.; EDWARDS, G. E. and KU, M. S. B., 1992. Control of photosynthesis ands tomatal. conductance in Ricinus communis L. (Castor bean) by leaf to air vapor pressure deficit. Plant Physiology, 99:1426-34. DAIE, J. & CAMPBELL, W. F., 1981. Response of tomato plants to stressful temperatures. Increase in abscisic acid concentrations. Plant Physiology, 67(1):26-9. DAVIES, W. J.; MANSFIELD, T. A. & HETHERINGTON, A. M., 1990. Sensing of water status and the regulation of plant growth and development. plant cell Environment, 13:709-19. DAVIS, E., 1977. Variation leaf of bean for age Crop Science, 17:640-5. DEBOUCK, D. G. & HIDALGO, R., 1985. Morfologia de la planta de frijol comum In: Frijol: Investigation y Producción(Editado por: M. Lopez, F. FERNANDEZ e A, van SCHOGNHOVEN). CIAT, Colômbia, p. 7-41. DE-POLLI, H.; ALMEIDA, D. L., et al, 1988. Manual de Adubação para o Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Coleção Rural No 2. Itaguaí, Editora Universidade Rural, 179p. DUBETZ, S. & MAHALLE, P. S., 1969, Effect of soi1 water stress on busll bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ot three stages of growth. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 94:479-81. EHRLER, W. L. & Van BAUEL, C resistance, illuminance, Physiology, 43:208-14. H.. M., 1968. Leaf diffusion and transpiration. Plant FARQUHAR, G. D. & RICHARDS, R. A.. 1984. Isotopic Composition of plant cnrbon correlates with water use officiency of wheat geno types. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11:539-52. FEDERICI, C. T.; EHDAIE, B. & WAINES, J. G., 1990. Domesticated and wild tepary bean: fiel performance with and without drought stress. Agronomy Journal, 82:896-900. FENG, Y.; LI, X.; BOERSMA, L., 1994. Roles of osmotic adjustment and turgor potential in leaf area expansion. Physiology Plantarum, 90:1-8. FERNANDEZ, C. J. & Mc CREE, K. J., 1991. Simulation model for studying dynamics of water flow and water status in plants. Crop Science, 31:391-8. 116 FERNANDEZ, F.; GEPTS, P.; LÓPEZ, M., 1985. Etapas de desarrollo en la planta de frijol. IN: Frijol: Investigación y Producción (Editado por: M. LÓPEZ, F. FERNANDEZ e A. van SCHOONHOVEN) . CIAT , Colômbia, p. 61-79. FIEGENBAUM, V.; DOS SANTOS, D. S., MELLO, V. D. C.; FILHO, B. G. S.; TILLMANN, M. A. A.; DA SILVA, J. B., 1991. Influência do déficit hídrico sobre os componentes de rendimento de três cultivares de feijão. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 26(2):275-80. FISCHER, R. A., 1973. The relationship of stomatal aperture and guard cell turgor pressure in Vicia faba. Journal of Experimental Botany, 24:387-99. FISCHER, R. A. & TURNER, N. C., 1978. Plant productivity in the arid and semiar id zones. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 29:227-.317. FORSETH, I. & EHLERINGER, J., 1983. Ecophysiology to two solar tracking desert winter annuals.. IV. Effects of leaf orientntion on calculated daily carbon gain and water use efficiency. Oecologia, 58: 10-8. GOLLAN, T.; TURNER, N. C.; SCHULZE, E. D., 1985. The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. III. In the xlerophyllous wordy species Nerium oleander. Oecologia, 65:356-62. 117 GREEN, P. B., 1968. Growth physics in Nitella: a method for continuous in vivo analysis in extensibility based on a micro-manometer technique for turgor pressure. Plant Physiology, 43:1169-84. GUIMARAES, C. M.; STEINMETZ, S.; PORTES, E CASTRO, T. de A., 1982. Uso de microlisímetros na determinação da evapotranspiração do feijoeiro da seca. In: Reunião Nacional de Pesquisa de Feijão, 1. Goiânia. Anais, p. 133-7. GUIMARAES, C. M. & PORTES E CASTRO, T. de A., 1982 a.. Sistema radicular do caup(vigna unguiculata L.) Walp.) e profundidade de aplicação de adubo. In: Reunião Nacional de Pesquisa de Caupi, 1. Resumos. CNPAF, p. 272-4. GUIMARAES, C. M. & PORTES E CASTRO, T. de A., 1982 b. Sistema radicular do feijoeiro condicionado aos efeitos da profundidade de aplicação e tipo de adubo fosfatado. In: Reunião Nacional de Pesquisa de Feijão, 1. Anais. EMBRAPA. CNPAF, p. 131-41. GUNASEKERA, D. &. BERKOWITZ, G. A., 1991. Evaluation of heterogenous stomatal closure in lenves of water stressed plants. Plant Physiology, 96:105-9. GUNASEKERA, D. & BERKOWITZ, G. A., 1992. Heterogenous stomatal closure in response to leaf water deficits is not a universal phenomenonn. Plant Physiology, 98:660-5. HANKS, R. J. & ASHCROFT, G. L., 1976. Physical proprieties of soils. Department of soil science and biometeorology. Logan Utah. 127pp. HARTUNG, W.; RADIIN, J. W.; HENDRIX, D. L., 1988. Absic acid movement into the apoplastic solution of water-stressed cotton leaves. Plant Physiology, 86(3):908-13. HENNESSEY, T. & FIELD, C. R., 1991. Circadian rhythms in photosynthsis. Oxillations in carbon assimilation and stomatal conductance under constant conditions. Plant Physiology, 96:831-6. HIRON, R. W. P. & WRIGHT, S. T. C., 1973. The role of endogenous abscisic acid in the response of plant to stress. Journal of Experimental Rotany, 24:769-81. HORNRERG, C. & WEILER, E. W., 1984. High-affinity binding sites for abscisic acid on the plamalemma of Vicia faba guard cells. Nature, 310:321-4. 11911 HOSTALÁCI0, S. e VÁLIO, I. F. M., 1984 Desenvolvimento de plantas de feijão CV. Goiano Precoce, em diferentes regimes de irrigação. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 19(2):211-8. HSIAO, T. C., 1970. Rapid changes in levels of polyribosomes in Zea mays in response to water stress. Plant Physiology, 46:281-8. HSIAO, T. C., 1973. Effects of water deficits on guard cell Potassium and stomatal movement. Plant Physiology Suplement, 4:43. HSIAO, T. C. & ACEVEDO E. , 1974. Plant responses to water deficits, water use efficiency, and drought resistance. Agricultural Meteorology, 14:59-84. HUFFAKER, R. C.; RADIN, T.; KLEINKOPT, G. E.; COX, E. L., 1970. Effects of mild water stress on enzymes of nitrate assimilation and of the carboxylative phase of photosynthesis in barley. Crop Science, 10:471-4. IDSO, S. B., 1987. Detection of global carbon dioxide effects. Nature, 329:293. IDSO, S. B.; ALLEN, S. G.; KIMBALL, B. A.; CHOUDHURY, B. J., 1989. Problems wilh porometry: Measuring net photosynthesis by leaf chamber techniques. Agronomy Journal, 81:475-9. ISQUIERDO, J. A. & HOSFIELD, G. L., 1983. The relat ionship of seed filling to yield among dry beans with differing architectural forms. Journal of the American Society Horticultural Science, 108(1):106-11. JACCOUD, A., 1971. Curvas características de umidade dos solos da área. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - Itaguaí-RJ, 72p. JOHNSON, D. A. & BROWN, R. W., 1977. Psychrometric analysis of turgor pressure response: A possible technique for evaluating plant water stress resistance. Crop Science, 17:507-10. JOHNSON, D. A. & CALDWELL, M. M., 1976. Water potential components, stomatal function, and liquid phase water transport resistances of four artic and alpine species in relation to moisture stress. Physiology Plantarum, 36:271-8. JONES, H. G., 1974. Assessement of stomatal control of plant water status. New Phytology, 73:851-9. JONES, H. G., 1989. Water stress and stem conductivity. In: Environmental Stress in Plants. Biochemical and Physiologiacal Mechanisms. Edited by J. II. Cherry. NATO AS1 Series, Vol G 19 Springer - Verlag Berlim Heidelberg, p. 17-24. JONES, M. M. & TURNEK, N. C., 1978. Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghum in response to water deficits. Plant Physiology, 61:122-6. KAISER, W. M.; HARTUNG, W., 1981. Uptake and release of absici acid by isolated photoautotrophic mesophyll cells, depending on pH gradienl. Plant Physiology, 68:202-6. KANEMASU, E. T. & TANNER, C. B., 1969 a. Stomatal diffusion resislance of snap beans. I.Influence of leaf water potential. Plant Physiology, 44:1547-52. KANEMASU, E. T. & TANNER, C. B., 1969 b. Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. II. Effect of light. Plant Physiology, 44:1542-6. KANO, Y., 1990. Measurement of soil moisture and water potential. In: Measurement Techniques in Plant Science. Academic Press Inc., pp. 165-81. KAPLAN, L., 1981. what is the origin ofthc common bean? Economic Botany, 35(2):240-57. KAPLAN, L.; LYNCH, T.; SMITIL, C. E., 1973. Early cultivated beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from an intermortane Peruvian Valley. Science, 170:76-7. KATTAN, A. A. & FLEMING, J. W., 1956. Effect of irrigation at specific stages of-development on yeld, quality, growth and composition of snap beans. Proceedings of the American Socicty for Horticullural Science, 68:329-42. KEMBLE, A. R. & Mac PHERSON, H. G., 1954. Liberation of aminoacids n perennial rye-grass during wilting. Biochemistry Journal, 58:46-9. KLAR, A. E., 1988. A água no sistema solo-planta-atmosfera. Editora Nobel, 408p. KRAMER, P. J., 1963. Water stress and plant growth. Agronomy Journal, 55:31-4. KRAMER, P. J., 1969. Plant and soi1 water relationships. A Modern synthesis. New York. Mc Graw Hill, 492 p. KRAMER, P. J., 1990. A brief history of water stress measurement. In: Measurement techniques in Plant Science, (Editor Y. Hashimoto). Academi Press. New York, p. 45-68. KRIEDEMANN, P. E.; LOUEYS, B . R.; FULLER, G. L.; LEOPOLD, A. C., 1972. Abscisic acid and stomatal regulation. Plant Physiology, 49:842-7. KÜPPERS, M.; HALL, A. E.; SCHULZE, E. D., 1982. Effects of day-to-day changes in root temperature on leaf conductance to water vapour and CO2 assimilation rates of Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. Oecologia, 52:116-20. LARSON, E. M.; HESKETH, J. D.; WOOLEY J. T.; PETERS, D. B., 1981. Seasonal variations in apparent photosynthesis among plant stands of different soybean cultivars. Photosynthes Research, 2: 3-20. LEVITT, J., 1972. Responses of plants to environmental stress. Academic Press, New York. LIVNE, A. & VAADIA, U., 1972. Water deficits and hormone relations. In: T. T. Koslowski (Editor), Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol 3. Academic Press. New York, p. 255-72. LOCKHART, J. A., 1965. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. Journal of Theory Biology, 8: 264-75. LOUREIRO, B. T.; MACHADO, P. B, DENÍCULl, W. e FERREI RA, P. A., 1990. Efeito de diferentes lâminas de água sobre a produtividade do feijoeiro-comum (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ceres, 37(211):215-26. LUDEWIG, M.; DÖRFFLING, K.; SIEFERT, H., 1988. Abscisic acid and water transport in sunflowers. Planta, 175:325-33. MACHADO, R. C. R.; RE.NA, A. B.; VIEIRA, C., 1976. Efeito da desidratação osmótica no acúmulo de prolina livre em discos foliares de vinte cultivares de Feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista Ceres, 23(128):302-9. MAGALHÃES, A. A. & M. LLAR, A. A., 1978. Efeito do déficit de água no período reprodutivo sobre a produção de feijão. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 13(2):55-60. MAGALHÃES, A. A.; MILLAR, A. A.; CHOUDHURY, E. N., 1979. Efeito do déficit fenológico de água sobre a produção de feijão. Turrialba, 29(4):269-73. MAKEEV, A. V.; KRENELEVA, T. E.; MORRONOSOV, A. T., 1992. Photosynthesis and abscisic acid. Review Soviet Plant Physiology, 39(1):118-27. MANTOVANI, E. C., 1986. Determinação do coeficiente de cultura para o feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) irrigado em duas épocas de plantio. Viçosa, UFV, 73p. (Tese de Mestrado). MARIN, R. & SILVA, J. V., 1972. Influence de la carence hydrique sur la repartition cellularie de l’acide ribonucleique foliaire chez le cotonnier. Physiology Plantarum, 27: 150-5. MARTIN, B. & RUIZ-TORRES, N. A., 1992. Effects of water-deficit stress on photosynthesis, its components and component limitations, and on water use efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiology, 100:733-9. MATIN, M. A.; BROWN. J. H.; FERGUSON, H., 1989. Leaf water potentinl, relative water content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley. Agronomy Journal, 31:100-5. MATTHEWS, M. A. & BOYER, J. S., 1984. Acclimation of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology, 74:161-6. MAURER, A. R.; ORMROD, D. P.; SCOTT, N. J., 1969. Effect of five soil water regimes on growht and composition of snap beans. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 49:271-8. MEIDNER, H. & MANSFIELD, T. A., 1968. Physiology of stomata. Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, Maidenhead, Heckshire England, 96p. MENGEL, K. & KIRKBY, E. A., 1982. Principles of plant nutrition. 3a ed. Worbaulen. International Potash Institute, 655p. MEYER, R. F. & BOYER, J. S., 1981. Osmoregulation, solute distribuition, and growth in soybean seedlings having low water potentials. Planta, 151:482-9. MILBURN, J. A., 1966. The conduction of sap, I. Water conduction and cavitation in water stressed leaves. Planta, 69 : 34-4 2. MILLAR, A. A. & GARDNER, W. R., 1972. Effect of the soil and plant water potentials on the dry matter production of snap beans. Agronomy Journal, 64(5):559-62. MIRANDA, N. 0. & BELMAR, N. C., 1977. Déficite hídrico frecuência de riego em frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agricultura Técnica, 37(3):111-7. MOONEY, N. & EHLERINCER, J., 1978. The carbon gain benefits of solar tracking in a desert annual. Plant Cell Environment, 1:307-11. MORGAN, P. W.; HE, C.; DE GREEF, J. A. & DE PROFT, P., 1990. Does water deficit stress promote ethylene synthesis by intact plants? Plant Physiology, 94:1616-24. MORILLA, C. A.; BOYER, J. S. & HAGERMAN, R. H., 1973. Nitrate Reductase Activity and polyribosomal Content of Corn (Zea mays L.) having low leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology, 51:817-24. MOSS, D. N.; WOOLLEY, J. T.; STONE, J. F., 1974. Plant modification for more efficient water use: The challenge. Agricultural Meteorology, 14:311-20. MULLER, 0.; GRIMME, K.; MEYER, C.; EHLERS, W., 1986. Leaf-water potential and stomatal conductance of fie Id-grown fababeans (Vicia faba L.) and vats (Avena sativa L.). Plant & Soil, 93:17-33. MUNNS, R.; RRADY, C. J.; BARLOW, E. W. K., 1979. Solute accumulation in the apex and leaves of wheat during water stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 6:379-89. NONAMI, H. & BOYER, J. S., 1989. Turgor and growth at low water potential. Plant Physiology, 89:798-804. OLIVEIRA, M. S., 1987. Efeito do déficit hídrico aplicado em diferentes fases do ciclo fenológico do feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). C. V. Eriparza, 60p. (Tese de Mestrado). O’TOOLE, J. C.; CROOKSTON, R. K.; THEHARNE, K. J. and OZBUN, J. II., 1976. Mesophyll resistance and carboxylase activity. A comparison under water stress conditions. Plant Physiology, 57:465-81. O’TOOLE, J. C.; OZABUM, J. l.; WALLACE, D. H., 1977. Photosynthetic response to water stress in Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiologia Plantarum, 40:111-4. PAHLICH, E., 1993. Larcher's definition of plant stress: A valuable principle for metabolic adaptibility research. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, 5(2):209-16. PALFI, G. & JUHASZ, J., 1971. The theoretical basis and pratical application of a new method of Selection for determining water deficiency in plants. Plant Soil, 34:503-7. PARDOSSI, A.; VERNIERI, P.; TOGNONI, F., 1992. Involvement of abscisic acid in regulating water status in Phaseolus vulgaris L. during chilling. Plant Physiology, 100: 1243-50. PARJOL, L., 1970. Investigation of drought resistance in beans at different growth stages. Field Crop Abstracts, 29(11):776. PASIN, N. H.; FILHO, B. G. dos S.; DOS SANTOS, D. S. B.; MELLO, V. D. C., 1491. Desempenho de sementes de feijão provenientes de plantas submetidas a déficit hídrico em dois estádios de crescimento. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 26(2):83-192. PASSIOURA, .J. B., 1980. The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany, 31:333-45. PASSIOURA, .J. B., 1988. Roots ignals control leaf expansion in wheat seedlings growing in drying soil. Australian Journal Plant Physiology, 15:687-93. PAZZETTI, G. A.; CANO, M. A. O.; RESENDE, M., 1992. Aplicação da termometria por infravermelho a irrigação do feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Parâmetros fisiológicos. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, 4(1):27-31. PEREIRA, A. R., 1989. Aspectos fisiológicos da produtividade vegetal. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, 1(2):139-42. PESCI, P. & REGGIANI, R., 1992. The process of abscisic acid- induced proline accumulation and the levels of polyamines and quaternary ammonium compounds in hydrated barley leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 84:134-9. PIMENTEL, C.; JACOB, J. N.; GOI, S. R.; PESSANHA, G. G., 1990. Estresse hídrico em cultivares de Phaseolus vulgaris L. em simbiose com o Rhizobium leguminosarus biovar phaseoli. Turrialba, 40(4):520-9. RAGGI, L. A.; BERNARDO, S.; GALVÃO, J. D., 1976. Efeito do turno de rega em três fases do ciclo do feijoeiro. Seiva Viçosa, 32(76):34-43. RASCHKE, K., 1975. Stomat a action. Annual Review Plant Physiology, 26:309-40. RAWLINS, S. L., 1972. Measurement of water content and the state of water in soils. In: T. T. Kozlowski (Editor), Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol 4. Academic Press. New York, p. 1-55. RAV, P. M.; GREEN, P. B.; CLELAND, R., 1972. Role of turgor in plant cell growth. Nature, 239:163-4. 131 REICIIARDT, K., 1975. Processos de transferência no sistema solo-planta-atmosrera. PIRACICABA, publicação especial do Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura e Fundação Cargill, 401p. REICOSKY, D. C. & DEATON, D. E., 1979. Soybean water extraction, leaf water potential and evapotranspiration during drought. Agronomy Journal, 71 : 45-50. RENA, A. B. & MASCLOTTI, Z., 1976. Efeito do déficit hídrico sobre o metabolismo do nitrogênio e o crescimento de quatro cultivares de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista Ceres, 23(128):288-301. ROBINS, J. S. & DOMINGO, C. E., 1956. Moisture deficit in relation to the growth and development of dry beans. Agronomy Journal, 48:67-70. SALTER, P. J. & GOOD, J. E., 1967. Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Farnham Royal, CAB. 246p. (Research review 2). SANCHEZ-DIAZ, M. F. & KRAMER, P. J., 1971. Behavior of corn and sorghum under water stress and during recovery. Plant Physiology, 45:613-6. SCHULZE, E. D., 19386 Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annual Review. Plant Physiology, 37:247-74. SHAH, C. B. & LOOMLS, R. S., 1965. Ribonucleic acid and protein metabolism in sugar beet during drought. Physiology Plantarum, 18:240-54. SHARKEY, T. D., 1984: Transpiration-induced changes in the photosyntheseic capacity of leaves. Planta, 160: 143-50. SHARKEY, T. D. & RASCHKE, K., 1980. Effects of phaseic acid and dihydrophaseic acid on stomata and the photosynthetic apparatus. Plant Physiology, 65(2):292-7. SHARKEY, T. D. & SEEMANNI, J. R., 1989. Mid water stress effects on carbon-reduction-cycle intermediales, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and spatial homogeneity of photosynthesis in intact leaves. Plant Physiology, 89: 1060-5. SHARP, R. E. & DAVIES, W. J., 1979. Solute regulation and grouth by roots and shoots of water-stressed maize plants. Planta, 147:43-9. SHAWCROFT, K. W.; LEMON, E. R.; Jr. ALLEN, L. H.; STEWART, D. W.; JENSEN, S. E., 1974. The soil-plant-atmosphere model and some of its predictions. Agricultural Meteorology, 14:287-307. SILVA, J. V., 1976. Water stress, ultrastructure and ensymatic activily. In: Water and Plant Life. Ecological Studies. Analysis and Synthesis. Vol 19 (Editerl O. L. Lange, L. kappen e E. D. Schulze). New York, p. 207-14. SILVIUS, J. E.; JOHNSON, R. R. & PETERS, D. B., 1977. Effect of water stress on carbon assimilation and distribution in soybean plants at different stages of development. Crop Science, 17:717-7. SINGH, T. N.; PALEG, L. G. & ASPINALL, D., 1973. Stress metabolism. III. Variations in response to water deficit in the barley plant. Australian Biology Science, 26:65-76. SIVUKAMAR, M. U. K. & SHAW, R. H., 1975. Relative evaluation of water stress indicators of soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 70:619-23. SLATYER, R. O., 1967. Plant-Water relationships. New York, Academic Press, 366p. SMARTT, J., 1978. Evolution and evolutionary problems in food legimes. Economic Botany, 34(3):219-35. SMIRNOFF, N., 1993. The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation, Transley Review No 52. New Phytology, 125: 27-58. SOLÁ ROVÁ J.; VÁCLAVIR, J.; POSPISILOVÁ, J., 1977, Leaf conduciance and gas exchange trough adaxial and abaxial surfaces in saler stressed primary leaves. Biologia Plantarum. 19(1): 59-64. STALFEL, M. C., 1955 The stomata as a hydrophotic regulator of rhe water. deficil of the plant. Physiology Plantarum, 8:573-93. STEWART, C. R., 1972 Effects of proline and carbohydrates on the melabolismo of exogenous proline by excised bean leaves in the dark. plant Physiology, 50:551-5. SUNDQUIST, E. T., 1987. Paleoclimatology: Ice core links CO2 to climate Nature, 329:389-90. TAYLOR, K. M. & KLEPPER, B., 1978. The role of rooting characteristcs in the supply of water to plants. Advances in Agronomy, 30:99-128. TODD, G. W., 1972. Water deficits and enzymatic activity. In: T. T. Kozlowski(Editor), Water Deficits and Plant Growth. Vol 3. Academic Press. New York, p. 177-216. TROUGHTON, J. H., 1969. Plant water status and carbon dioxide exchange of cotton leaves. Australian Journal Biological Science, 22: 289-302. TURNER, N. C., 1986. Crop water deficits: a decade of progress. Advances in Agronomy, 39: 1-51. TURNER, N. C.; REGG, J. E.; RAWSON, I. H. M.; ENGLISH, S. D.; HEAM, A. B., 1978a. Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean e sorghum crops to water deficits. III. Components of leaf water Potential, leaf conductance, 14CO2 photosynthesis and adaptation to water deficits. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 5: 179-94. TURNER, N. C.; BEGG J. E.; TONNET, M. L., 1978 b. Osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water deficits and its influence on the water potential at which stomata close. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 5:597-608. VAADIA, Y.; RANEY, F. C. & JIAGAN, R. M., 1961. Plant water cleficits and physiological processes. Annual Review Plant Physiology, 12:265-92. VIEIRA, C., 1970. período crítico de competição entre ervas daninhas e a culturas 1do feijão. Revista Ceres, Viçosa, 17(94):354-67. VIEIRA, C., 1983. Cultura do feijão. 2a ed. Viçosa. Imprensa Universitária, 146p. VIEIRA, II. J.; ANGELOCCI, L. R.; LIBARDI, P. L.; BERGAMASCHI, H., 1989 a. Comportamento de duas variedades de feijoeiro sob dois regimes de disponibilidade hídrica do solo III. Variação do potencial total da água na folha e de seus componentes na variedade Aroana 80. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 24(9):1055-63. VIEIRA, Il. J.; BERGAMASCHI, H.; ANGELOCCI, L. R.; LIBARDI, P. L., 1989 b. Comportamento de duas variedades de feijoeiro sob dois regimes de disponibilidade hídrica no solo. II. Resistência estomática à difusão de vapor, densidade de fluxo transpiratório e potenciais da água na planta. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 24(9):1045-53. VILHORDO, B. W.; BURIN, M. E. & GANDOLFI, V. H., 1988. Morfologia do feijoeiro. In: Cultura do Feijoeiro: Fatores que afetam a produtividade (Editado por Zimmermann et al) POTAFOS, p. 86-123. 137 WALDREN, R. P. & TEARE, I. D., 1974. Changes in free proline concentration in sorghum and soybean plants under fields conditions. Crop Science, 14:447-50. WHITE, J. W. & CASTILHO, J. A., 1992. Evaluation of diverse shoot genotypes on selected root genotypes of common bean under soil water deficits. Crop Science, 32:762-5. WIEBE, H. H. & BROWN, R. W., 1979. Temperature gradient effects on in situ hygrometer measurements of soil water potential. II. Water movement. Agronomy Journal, 71:397-401. WIEBE, H. H. & PROSSER, R. J., 1977. Influence of temperature gradients on leaf water potential. Plant Physiology, 59:256-8. WOLF, O.; JESCHKE, W. D.; HARTUNG, W., 1990. The possible sites of síntese of ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany, 41(226):593-8. WRIGHT, S. T. C., 1989. An increase in the “inhibitor-B" content of delached whent leaves following a period of witing. Planta, 86: 10-20. 138 YANG, S. J. & DE JONG, E., 1972. Effect of areial environment and soil water potentials on the transpiration and energy status of water in wheat plants. Agronomy Journal, 64(5):574-8. ZIMMERMAN, V., 1978. Physics of turgor and osmoregulation. Anual Review Plant Physiology, 29:121-48.pt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqAgronomiapt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Mestrado em Agronomia - Ciência do Solo

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1995 - Jeferson Luiz Ferrari.pdf1,25 MBAdobe PDFAbrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.