Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/26622
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLima, Pamella Pryscila de Alvarenga Bissoli Maciel de-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-13T14:42:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-13T14:42:03Z-
dc.date.issued2026-02-27-
dc.identifier.citationLIMA, Pamella Pryscila de Alvarenga Bissoli Maciel de. Análise da resposta inflamatória e do microbioma cecal de frangos de corte desafiados com diferentes doses vacinais contra Eimeria spp. 2026. 93 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Veterinárias) - Instituto de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, 2026.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/26622-
dc.description.abstractA coccidiose aviária é uma doença entérica causada por Eimeria spp., responsável por comprometer a integridade do epitélio intestinal, reduzir a absorção de nutrientes e prejudicar o desempenho zootécnico das aves. Entre as espécies de maior importância para a avicultura destacam-se Eimeria tenella, E. acervulina e E. maxima. Neste estudo, frangos de corte Cobb 500 foram desafiados por gavagem oral, no primeiro dia de vida, com a vacina Fortegra® (MSD Saúde Animal), contendo oocistos atenuados dessas três espécies, em doses correspondentes a 10x, 20x e 40x a dose recomendada pelo fabricante, além de um grupo controle tratado com PBS. Amostras de tecidos intestinais e conteúdo cecal foram coletadas aos 7, 14 e 21 dias pós- desafio. A presença de Eimeria spp. nos tecidos intestinais foi avaliada por qPCR, e a expressão de genes relacionados à resposta imune e à integridade intestinal, bem como a composição da microbiota cecal, foram analisadas por abordagens moleculares. Os resultados demonstraram que tanto a dose do desafio quanto o tempo pós-infecção influenciaram a resposta imune, a integridade intestinal e a microbiota cecal dos frangos. No experimento de expressão gênica, utilizando os grupos 10x e 40x, a maior carga parasitária induziu respostas imunes mais intensas e prolongadas, caracterizadas pela modulação de citocinas pró- e anti-inflamatórias e pela regulação de genes relacionados às junções de adesão do epitélio intestinal. Observou-se um padrão temporal com picos iniciais de mediadores pró-inflamatórios, seguidos pela ativação de mecanismos moduladores, sugerindo tentativa do hospedeiro de conter a inflamação e restabelecer a homeostase intestinal. Entretanto, a maior carga parasitária também indicou possível supressão progressiva da resposta imune, o que pode comprometer a eliminação do patógeno e prolongar o reparo tecidual. Em paralelo, no experimento de microbiota, com os grupos 10x e 20x, a comunidade cecal foi modulada principalmente pelo tempo pós-infecção, com aumento progressivo da riqueza, equitabilidade e diversidade até 21 dias, refletindo o processo de maturação intestinal. O efeito da dose sobre o microbioma foi mais limitado, sendo a menor dose associada a maior equilíbrio microbiano e menor presença de táxons oportunistas, enquanto a dose mais elevada esteve relacionada à redução de gêneros potencialmente benéficos e ao aumento de táxons potencialmente patogênicos. De forma geral, os achados demonstram que a interação entre dose infecciosa e tempo pós-infecção é determinante para a compreensão dos mecanismos imunológicos e das alterações microbianas associadas à coccidiose em frangos, contribuindo para o aprimoramento de estratégias de controle, manejo e prevenção da doença na avicultura.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropt_BR
dc.subjectGallus galluspt_BR
dc.subjectEimeria tenellapt_BR
dc.subjectEimeria acervulinapt_BR
dc.subjectEimeria máximapt_BR
dc.subjectExpressão gênicapt_BR
dc.subjectNGSpt_BR
dc.subject16S rRNApt_BR
dc.titleAnálise da resposta inflamatória e do microbioma cecal de frangos de corte desafiados com diferentes doses vacinais contra Eimeria spp.pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of the inflammatory response and cecal microbiome of broiler chickens challenged with different vaccine doses against Eimeria spp.en
dc.typeTesept_BR
dc.description.abstractOtherAvian coccidiosis is an enteric disease caused by Eimeria spp. that impairs the integrity of the intestinal epithelium, reduces nutrient absorption, and compromises the zootechnical performance of birds. Among the species of greatest importance to poultry production are Eimeria tenella, E. acervulina, and E. maxima. In this study, Cobb 500 broiler chickens were orally challenged on the first day of life with Fortegra® vaccine (MSD Animal Health), containing attenuated oocysts of these three species, at doses corresponding to 10×, 20×, and Intestinal tissue and cecal content samples were collected at 7, 14, and 21 days post-challenge. The presence of Eimeria spp. in intestinal tissues was evaluated by qPCR, and the expression of genes related to immune response and intestinal integrity, as well as the composition of the cecal microbiota, were analyzed using molecular approaches. The results showed that both challenge dose and post-infection time influenced the immune response, intestinal integrity, and cecal microbiota of broilers. In the gene expression experiment, using the 10× and 40× groups, the higher parasite load induced more intense and prolonged immune responses, characterized by modulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and regulation of genes related to adhesion junctions in the intestinal epithelium. A temporal pattern was observed, with early peaks of pro-inflammatory mediators followed by the activation of modulatory mechanisms, suggesting an attempt by the host to contain inflammation and restore intestinal homeostasis. However, the higher parasite load also indicated a possible progressive suppression of the immune response, which may compromise pathogen clearance and prolong tissue repair. In parallel, in the microbiota experiment, using the 10× and 20× groups, the cecal community was modulated mainly by post-infection time, with a progressive increase in richness, evenness, and diversity up to 21 days, reflecting the process of intestinal maturation. The effect of dose on the microbiome was more limited, with the lower dose being associated with greater microbial balance and lower representation of opportunistic taxa, whereas the higher dose was associated with a reduction in potentially beneficial genera and an increase in potentially pathogenic taxa. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the interaction between infectious dose and post- infection time is critical for understanding the immunological mechanisms and microbial alterations associated with coccidiosis in broiler chickens, contributing to the improvement of control, management, and prevention strategies in poultry production.en
dc.contributor.advisor1Santos, Huarrisson Azevedo-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-3626pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3751609492049306pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Sousa, Felipe Dilelis de Resende-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9681-4775pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6013160057224364pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co2Machado, Leandro dos Santos-
dc.contributor.advisor-co2IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4117-195Xpt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5006335731194193pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Fraga, Alícia Zem-
dc.contributor.referee1IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-7441pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7608490441428986pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Santos, Huarrisson Azevedo-
dc.contributor.referee2IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-3626pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3751609492049306pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Reis, Túlio Leite-
dc.contributor.referee3IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-8740pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7704527411657695pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Abreu, Dayse Lima da Costa-
dc.contributor.referee4IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-1909pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee4Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0725387860906270pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Martins, Nelson Rodrigo da Silva-
dc.contributor.referee5IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-2228pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee5Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3767979348338740pt_BR
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-9551pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7288934220988761pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Veterináriapt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterináriaspt_BR
dc.relation.referencesABPA ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE PROTEINA ANIMAL. [Informações sobre produção animal no Brasil]. Disponível em: https://abpa-br.org/ Acesso em: 12 ago. 2025. ABBAS, R. Z. et al. Anticoccidial drug resistance in fowl coccidia: the state of play revisited. , Cambridge, v. 67, n. 2, p. 337-350, 2011. doi: 10.1017/S004393391100033X. ALLEN, P. C.; FETTERER, R. H. Recent advances in biology of Eimeria species and diagnosis and control of infection with these coccidian parasites of poultry. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Washington, v. 15, n. 1, p. 58-65, 2002. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.1.58-65.2002. ANADON, A.; MARTINEZ-LARRANAGA, M. R. Residues of antimicrobial drugs and feed additives in animal products: regulatory aspects. Livestock Production Science, Amsterdam, v. 59, n. 2-3, p. 183-198, 1999. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00026-5. AWAD, W. A.; HESS, C.; HESS, M. Enteric pathogens and their toxin-induced disruption of the intestinal barrier through alteration of tight junctions in chickens. Toxins, Basel, v. 9, n. 2, p. 60, 2017. doi: 10.3390/toxins9020060. BASSI, N.; SILVA, C. Oportunidades e desafios em PD&I na cadeia produtiva de frangos de corte. Avicultura Industrial, Concórdia, ed. 1271, v. 109, n. 10, p. 16-21, 2017. BLAKE, D. P. et al. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Veterinary Research, Paris, v. 51, n. 115, p. 1-14, 2020. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2. BLAKE, D. P.; TOMLEY, F. M. Securing poultry production from the ever-present Eimeria challenge. Trends in Parasitology, Amsterdam, v. 30, n. 1, p. 12-19, 2014. doi: 14 10.1016/j.pt.2013.10.003. BURRELL, A.; TOMLEY, F. M.; VAUGHAN, S.; MARUGAN-HERNANDEZ, V. Life cycle stages, specific organelles and invasion mechanisms of Eimeria species. Parasitology, Cambridge, v. 147, n. 3, p. 263-278, 2020. doi: 10.1017/S0031182019001562. CARVALHO, F. S. et al. Diagnosis of Eimeria species using traditional and molecular methods in field studies. Veterinary Parasitology, Amsterdam, v. 176, n. 2-3, p. 95-100, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.024. CERVANTES, H. M.; MCDOUGALD, L. R.; JENKINS, M. C. Coccidiosis. In: SWAYNE, D. E. (ed.). Diseases of Poultry. 14. ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2020. v. 2, p. 1193-1217. CEVALLOS-GORDON, A. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Eimeria spp. in broiler chickens from Pichincha and Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador. Pathogens, Basel, v. 13, n. 1, p. 48, 2024. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13010048. CHAPMAN, H. D.; JOHNSON, Z. B. Oocysts of Eimeria in the litter of broilers reared to eight weeks of age before and after withdrawal of lasalocid or salinomycin. Poultry Science, Oxford, v. 71, n. 8, p. 1342-1347, 1992. doi: 10.3382/ps.0711342. CHENG, Y. F. et al. Dietary mannan oligosaccharide ameliorates cyclic heat stress-induced damages on intestinal oxidative status and barrier integrity of broilers. Poultry Science, Oxford, v. 98, n. 10, p. 4767-4776, 2019. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez249. DALLOUL, R. A.; LILLEHOJ, H. S. Coccidiose avícola: avanços recentes em medidas de controle e desenvolvimento de vacinas. Expert Review of Vaccines, London, v. 5, n. 1, p. 143- 163, 2006. doi: 10.1586/14760584.5.1.143. DAS, Q. et al. Effects of vaccination against coccidiosis on gut microbiota and immunity in broiler fed bacitracin and berry pomace. Frontiers in Immunology, Lausanne, v. 12, p. 621803, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.621803. DIMIER, I. H. et al. Inhibition of Eimeria tenella development in vitro mediated by chicken macrophages and fibroblasts treated with chicken cell supernatants with IFN- activity. Avian Diseases, Jacksonville, v. 42, n. 2, p. 239-247, 1998. doi: 10.2307/1592493. DUAN, C. et al. Expression of IL-1 in transgenic Eimeria necatrix enhances the immunogenicity of parasites and promotes mucosal immunity against coccidiosis. Frontiers 15 in Immunology, Lausanne, v. 15, p. 1435702, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1435702. DUCATELLE, R.; EECKHAUT, V.; HAESEBROUCK, F.; VAN IMMERSEEL, F. A review on prebiotics and probiotics for the control of dysbiosis: present status and future perspectives. Animal, Cambridge, v. 9, p. 43-48, 2015. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002584. EL-SHALL, N. A. et al. Phytochemical control of poultry coccidiosis: a review. Poultry Science, Oxford, v. 101, n. 1, p. 101542, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101542. FATOBA, A. J.; ADELEKE, M. A. Diagnosis and control of chicken coccidiosis: a recent update. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, Basingstoke, v. 42, n. 4, p. 483-493, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s12639-018-1048-1. FERNANDO, M. A.; MCCRAW, B. M. Mucosal morphology and cellular renewal in the intestine of chickens following a single infection of Eimeria acervulina. The Journal of Parasitology, Lawrence, v. 59, n. 3, p. 493-501, 1973. doi: 10.2307/3278798. GAZONI, F. L. et al. Correlation between intestinal health and coccidiosis prevalence in broilers in Brazilian agroindustries. Parasitology International, Amsterdam, v. 76, p. 102027, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2019.102027. GONZÁLEZ-MARISCAL, L.; BETANZOS, A.; NAVA, P.; JARAMILLO, B. E. Tight junction proteins. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, v. 81, n. 1, p. 1 44, 2003. GUO, P. et al. The digestive tract histology and geographical distribution of gastrointestinal microbiota in yellow-feather broilers. Poultry Science, Oxford, v. 102, n. 10, p. 102844, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102844. HONG, Y. H. et al. Analysis of chicken cytokine and chemokine gene expression following Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria tenella infections. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, Amsterdam, v. 114, n. 3-4, p. 209-223, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.07.007. JENKINS, M. C.; PARKER, C.; RITTER, D. Eimeria oocyst concentrations and species composition in litter from commercial broiler farms during anticoccidial drug or live Eimeria oocyst vaccine control programs. Avian Diseases, Jacksonville, v. 61, n. 2, p. 214-220, 2017. doi: 10.1637/11578-010317-Reg. KAWAZOE, U.; et al. Characterisation and histopathological observations of a selected Brazilian precocious line of Eimeria acervulina. Veterinary Parasitology, Amsterdam, v. 16 131, n. 1-2, p. 5-14, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.038. PRATA, M. C. Coccidiose. In: ANDREATTI FILHO, R. L.; BERCHIERI FILHO, Â.; FERNANDES, V. H.; GIVISIEZ, A. M.; RODRIGUES, C. R.; ALMEIDA JUNIOR, O. S. (org.). Doenças das aves. 3. ed. Campinas: FACTA, 2020. p. 609-627. KIM, W. H.; CHAUDHARI, A. A.; LILLEHOJ, H. S. Involvement of T cell immunity in avian coccidiosis. Frontiers in Immunology, Lausanne, v. 10, p. 2732, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02732. LEE, Y.; LU, M.; LILLEHOJ, H. S. Coccidiosis: recent progress in host immunity and alternatives to antibiotic strategies. Vaccines, Basel, v. 10, n. 2, p. 215, 2022. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020215. LESHCHINSKY, T. V.; KLASING, K. C. Divergence of the inflammatory response in two types of chickens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology, Oxford, v. 25, n. 7, p. 629-638, 2001. doi: 10.1016/S0145-305X(01)00023-4. LI, M. H. et al. Dynamic description of temporal changes of gut microbiota in broilers. Poultry Science, v. 101, n. 9, p. 102037, set. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102037. LILLEHOJ, H. S.; LILLEHOJ, E. P. Avian coccidiosis: a review of acquired intestinal immunity and vaccination strategies. Avian Diseases, Jacksonville, v. 44, p. 408-425, 2000. doi: 10.2307/1592556. LILLEHOJ, H. S.; TROUT, J. M. Avian gut-associated lymphoid tissues and intestinal immune responses to Eimeria parasites. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Washington, v. 9, n. 3, p. 349- 360, 1996. doi: 10.1128/CMR.9.3.349-360.1996. LILLEHOJ, H. S.; MIN, W.; DALLOUL, R. A. Recent progress on the cytokine regulation of intestinal immune responses to Eimeria. Poultry Science, Oxford, v. 83, n. 4, p. 611-623, 2004. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.4.611. LIU, J. et al. Dynamic response of the intestinal microbiome to Eimeria maxima-induced coccidiosis in chickens. Microbiology Spectrum, Washington, v. 12, n. 10, p. e0082324, 2024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00823-24. LIU, Q. et al. Live attenuated anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. Trends in Parasitology, Amsterdam, v. 39, n. 12, p. 1087-1099, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2023.09.002. 17 MARCHESI, J. R.; RAVEL, J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome, v. 3, p. 31, 2015. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5 MADLALA, T.; OKPEKU, M.; ADELEKE, M. A. Understanding the interactions between Eimeria infection and gut microbiota, towards the control of chicken coccidiosis: a review. Parasite, v. 28, p. 48, 2021. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2021047. MACDONALD, S. E. et al. Effects of Eimeria tenella infection on chicken caecal microbiome diversity, exploring variation associated with severity of pathology. PLoS ONE, v. 12, n. 9, e0184890, 2017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184890. MAHMOOD, T.; GUO, Y. Dietary fiber and chicken microbiome interaction: Where will it lead to? Animal Nutrition, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2019.11.004. MCDONALD, V.; SHIRLEY, M. W. Past and future: vaccination against Eimeria. Parasitology, Cambridge, v. 136, n. 12, p. 1477-1489, out. 2009. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009006349. MESA-PINEDA, C . et al. Chicken coccidiosis: from the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 8, p. 787653, dez. 2021. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.787653. NOGUEIRA, V. A.; FRANÇA, T. N.; PEIXOTO, P. V. Ionophore poisoning in animals. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, v. 29, p. 191-197, 2009. OAKLEY, B. B. Et al. O microbioma gastrointestinal do frango. FEMS Microbiology Letters, v. 360, p. 100 112, 2014. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6968.12608. PEEK, H. W.; LANDMAN, W. J. M. Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. Veterinary Quarterly, v. 31, n. 3, p. 143-161, 2011. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2011.605247. POWER, S. E. et al. Intestinal microbiota, diet and health. British Journal of Nutrition, v. 111, p. 387 402, 2014. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513002560. PU, X. et al. Inhibitory effect of Eimeria maxima IFN- inhibitory molecules on the immune function of T cell subsets in chickens. Poultry Science, v. 102, n. 12, p. 103098, dez. 2023. doi: 18 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103098. QUIROZ-CASTAÑEDA, R. E.; DANTÁN-GONZÁLEZ, E. Control of avian coccidiosis: future and present natural alternatives. BioMed Research International, 2015, Art. 430610, 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/430610. REMMAL, A. et al. Destruição in vitro de oocistos de Eimeria por óleos essenciais. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 182, p. 121-126, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.06.002. RYCHLIK, I. Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals (Basel), v. 10, n. 1, p. 103, 8 jan. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ani10010103 SAKAMOTO, K. S. et al. The challenges of animal welfare in modern Brazilian poultry farming. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, v. 8, n. 2, p. 131-135, 2020. doi: 10.31893/jabb.20018. SWINKELS, W. J. C. et al. Immune responses to an Eimeria acervulina infection in different broiler lines. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, v. 117, n. 1-2, p. 26-34, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.01.020. TURNER, J. R. Função da barreira da mucosa intestinal na saúde e na doença. Nature Reviews Immunology, v. 9, p. 799-809, 2009. doi: 10.1038/nri2653. VEREECKEN, M. et al. Restoration of the sensitivity of Eimeria acervulina to anticoccidial drugs in the chicken following use of a live coccidiosis vaccine. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 292, Art. 109416, 2021. VRBA, V.; BLAKE, D. P.; POPLSTEIN, M. Quantitative real-time PCR assays for detection and quantification of all seven Eimeria species that infect the chicken. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 174, p. 183-190, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.006. XUE, N. et al. Comparison of Gut Microbiome Profile of Chickens Infected with Three Eimeria Species Reveals New Insights on Pathogenicity of Avian Coccidia. Microorganisms. 2025 Dec 3;13(12):2752. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13122752. XIAO, S. S. et al. Microbial diversity and community variation in the intestines of layer chickens. Animals (Basel), v. 11, n. 3, p. 840, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030840. WIGLEY, P.; KAISER, P. Avian cytokines in health and disease. Brazilian Journal of Poultry 19 Science, v. 5, p. 1-14, 2003. WILLIAMS, R. B. Fifty years of anticoccidial vaccines for poultry (1952 2002). Avian Diseases, v. 46, n. 4, p. 775-802, out. dez. 2002. doi: 10.1637/0005- 2086(2002)046[0775:FYOAVF]2.0.CO;2 YAMADA, T. et al. IL-1 induced chemokine production through the association of Syk with TNF receptor-associated factor-6 in nasal fibroblast lines. Journal of Immunology, v. 167, n. 1, p. 283-288, 2001. YU, H. et al. Research Note: Correlation analysis of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and CC motif chemokine ligand 2 gene expression in chicken spleen and cecal tissues after Eimeria tenella infection in vivo. Poultry Science, v. 99, n. 3, p. 1326-1331, 2020. YUN, C. H.; LILLEHOJ, H. S.; LILLEHOJ, E. P. Intestinal immune responses to coccidiosis. Developmental & Comparative Immunology, v. 24, n. 2-3, p. 303-324, 2000. ZAHEER, T. et al. Vaccines against chicken coccidiosis with particular reference to previous decade: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Parasitology Research, v. 121, p. 2749-2763, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07612-6.pt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqMedicina Veterináriapt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Doutorado em Ciências Veterinárias

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2026 - PAMELLA PRYSCILA DE ALVARENGA BISSOLI MACIEL DE LIMA.pdf4,24 MBAdobe PDFAbrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.