Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/14062
Tipo do documento: Dissertação
Título: Ilhas, arquipélagos ou continentes? Uma análise sobre a geografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal
Autor(es): Huaracha, Jeferson dos Santos Antunes
Orientador(a): Alvim, Leandro Guimarães Marques
Primeiro coorientador: Tavares, Rodrigo de Souza
Primeiro membro da banca: Alvim, Leandro Guimarães Marques
Segundo membro da banca: Silva, Jeferson Mariano
Terceiro membro da banca: Mello, Carlos Eduardo Ribeiro de
Palavras-chave: Supremo Tribunal Federal;comportamento judicial;análise espacial de votos;Habeas Corpus.;Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade;Brazilian Federal Supreme Court;judicial behavior;spatial analysis of voting;Direct Action of Unconstitutionality
Área(s) do CNPq: Interdisciplinar
Idioma: por
Data do documento: 30-Nov-2022
Editor: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
Sigla da instituição: UFRRJ
Departamento: Instituto Multidisciplinar de Nova Iguaçu
Programa: Programa de Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar em Humanidades Digitais
Citação: HUARACHA, Jeferson dos Santos Antunes. Ilhas, arquipélagos ou continentes? Uma análise sobre a geografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal. 2022. 133 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Humanidades Digitais) - Instituto Multidisciplinar, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Nova Iguaçu, RJ, 2022.
Resumo: In times of institutional crisis between the Executive and Judiciary powers in Brazil, the call for research on the patterns of the Federal Supreme Court is reinforced. Topics such as spatial models of voting, theories of judicial behavior and estimation of ideal points permeate the texts in international research and, recently, began to emerge in the Brazilian scenario. This research brought an innovative approach: the decision patterns implicit in the voting scores related to Habeas Corpus requests judged by the Federal Supreme Court in the period from 2011 to 2022. The votes of Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality are also analyzed. The analyzes are conducted on four parts of the period. The objective was to identify ideological, strategic, or legal patterns and groupings among the analyzed voters, having as a source of data the main judgments of both procedural classes over the period. The proposed methodology involved extracting data, producing a dataset, and employing tools common to Data Science, to integrate them with the techniques common to the spatial analysis of dissidences. Graphic visualizations were created on matrices of distances and similarities, hierarchical groupings as well as multidimensional scaling aimed at analyzing the geography of the court, under the prism of the metaphor of the eleven islands. Several indications were found that corroborate the assumption that the Court has similar dissent patterns in hugely different procedural classes. Other contributions achieved in this work are the sharing of vote counting automation code and answers to usual questions about politicization of the Judiciary in Brazil.
Abstract: En tiempos de crisis institucional entre los poderes Ejecutivo y Judicial en Brasil, se hace evidente la necesidad de nuevas investigaciones que analicen los patrones de disidencia de los ministros del Supremo Tribunal Federal. Temas como modelos espaciales de votación, teorías del comportamiento judicial y estimación de puntos ideales son ampliamente discutidos en investigaciones internacionales y recientemente comenzaron a emerger en el escenario brasileño. La presente investigación trae un nuevo enfoque relacionado a los patrones disidentes en decisiones de Habeas Corpus, juzgadas por el Supremo Tribunal Federal, comparándolos con las Acciones Directas de Inconstitucionalidad del período comprendido entre 2011 y 2022, investigaciones que se dieron en cuatro partes. El objetivo fue identificar patrones y agrupaciones ideológicas, jurídicas o estratégicas entre los jueces analizados, teniendo como fuente de datos las principales decisiones de ambas clases procesales. La metodología propuesta consistió en extraer y producir un conjunto de datos, emplear herramientas propias de la Ciencia de Datos para integrarlas con las técnicas propias del análisis espacial de las disidencias. Se crearon visualizaciones gráficas sobre matrices de distancias y similitudes, agrupaciones jerárquicas y escalamientos multidimensionales con el objetivo de analizar la geografía del tribunal, bajo el prisma de la metáfora de las once islas. Se encontraron varios indicios que corroboran el supuesto de que la Corte tiene patrones disidentes similares en clases procesales muy diferentes. Otras contribuciones logradas en este trabajo son el intercambio de código de automatización de conteo de votos además de las respuestas a preguntas comunes sobre la politización del Poder Judicial en Brasil.In times of institutional crisis between the Executive and Judiciary powers in Brazil, the call for research on the patterns of the Federal Supreme Court is reinforced. Topics such as spatial models of voting, theories of judicial behavior and estimation of ideal points permeate the texts in international research and, recently, began to emerge in the Brazilian scenario. This research brought an innovative approach: the decision patterns implicit in the voting scores related to Habeas Corpus requests judged by the Federal Supreme Court in the period from 2011 to 2022. The votes of Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality are also analyzed. The analyzes are conducted on four parts of the period. The objective was to identify ideological, strategic, or legal patterns and groupings among the analyzed voters, having as a source of data the main judgments of both procedural classes over the period. The proposed methodology involved extracting data, producing a dataset, and employing tools common to Data Science, to integrate them with the techniques common to the spatial analysis of dissidences. Graphic visualizations were created on matrices of distances and similarities, hierarchical groupings as well as multidimensional scaling aimed at analyzing the geography of the court, under the prism of the metaphor of the eleven islands. Several indications were found that corroborate the assumption that the Court has similar dissent patterns in hugely different procedural classes. Other contributions achieved in this work are the sharing of vote counting automation code and answers to usual questions about politicization of the Judiciary in Brazil.
URI: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/14062
Aparece nas coleções:Mestrado em Humanidades Digitais

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2022 - Jeferson dos Santos Antunes Huaracha.Pdf2.04 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.