Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/11776
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalles, Márcia de Senna Nunes
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T01:56:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-22T01:56:52Z-
dc.date.issued1987-06-02
dc.identifier.citationSALLES, Márcia de Senna Nunes. Estudo comparado do desenvolvimento pós-embrionário de Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 criada em fezes de animais domésticos sobre condições de laboratório. 1987. 62 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias) - Instituto de Ciências Exatas Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica - RJ, 1987.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/11776-
dc.description.abstractO objetivo do presente trabalho foi o de comparar o desenvolvimento e a viabilidade das fases pós-embrionárias de Musca domestica L. 1758 (Díptera, Muscidae), criadas em fezes de animais domésticos de importância econômica (bovinos, suí- nos, galinhas e eqüinos), em diferentes períodos pós-emissão. O experimento foi realizado no Laboratório de Biologia de Insetos da Estação Experimental para Pesquisas Parasitológicas W.O. Neitz da Área de Parasitologia, Departamento de Biologia Animal, da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. Os substratos de criação utilizados no experimento, isto é, fezes recém-emitidas, com 24, 48, 72 e 96 horas pósemissão, provenientes de Bos taurus L., Sus scrofa L., Gallus gallus L. e Equus caballus L., foram "inoculadas" com larvas com até 24 horas de idade. Em fezes de eqüinos, o desenvolvimento das fases pós-embrionárias de M. domestica só ocorreu em fezes recém-emitidas. Nos tratamentos relativos a fezes de bovinos, suínos e galinhas, a viabilidade do estágio larval, o xviii. peso de pupas, a duração e a viabilidade do período de larva a adulto, foram influenciadas pela interação dos fatores analisados (tipo de fezes x período pós-emissão). Fezes de suínos com até 72 horas pós-emissão e fezes de galinhas recém-emitidas foram os substratos mais adequados ao desenvolvimento de M. domestica. A duração e a viabilidade do estágio pupal não foram influenciadas pelo tipo de substrato de criação utilizado durante o período larval. Contudo, foi evidenciada a influência do tipo e idade das fezes no peso de pupas de M. domestica, sendo que, o peso médio de pupas provenientes de larvas criadas em fezes de bovinos, foi significativamente menor do que os obtidos a partir de fezes de suínos e galinhaspor
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação e Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESpor
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiropor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.subjectMedicina Veterináriapor
dc.titleEstudo comparado do desenvolvimento pós-embrionário de Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 criada em fezes de animais domésticos sobre condições de laboratóriopor
dc.typeDissertaçãopor
dc.description.abstractOtherThe objective of the present study was to compare the development and viability of larvae, pupae and adult stages of Musca domestica L. 1758 (Díptera, Muscidae), raised in faeces of domesticated animals (cattle, swine, poultry and equines), in differents periods post-emission. The study was conducted at the laboratory of Insect Biology of the Experimental Station for Parasitological Research W.O. Neitz, Department of Animal Biology, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. Faeces of Bos taurus L., Sus scrofa L., Gallus gallus L. and Equus caballus L., recently eliminated, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours old were seeded with up to 24 hours old larvae. In horse faeces, the M. domestica larvae stages developed only in recently eliminated faeces. About treatments with bovine, swine and poultry faeces, the larval stage viability, pupae weight, duration and viability of larval to adult stage, were influenciated by the interaction factors analised (types of faeces x post-emission periods). Faeces of swine up to 72 hours old xx. and recently eliminated faeces of poultry were considered the most appropriate medium for development of M. domestica. The pupation period and viability of pupae were not influenced by type of faeces. However, the average weight of pupae of M. domestica from cattle faeces was lower than the average weight of pupae recovered from swine and poultry faeces.eng
dc.contributor.advisor1Azevedo, Eliane Maria Vieira Milward de
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8979055616457738por
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8979055616457738por
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpor
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúdepor
dc.publisher.initialsUFRRJpor
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterináriaspor
dc.relation.referencesABDERL-GAWAAD, A.A. & ELGAYER, F.H. Experiments for serving the problem of controlling house fly in Alexandria city. Z. Angew. Ent. 70(2): 203-208. 1972 AMANO, K. Breeding of the house fly (M. domestica, Diptera, Musdicae) in fresh dung of cattle fed on pasture grass. Appl. Ent. Zoll. 20(2): 143-150, 1985. A.O.A.C. Official Methods of Analysis (5 th ed.). Association of Official Agricultural Chemistis Washington, D.C. 1970. BAI, M.G. & SANKARAN, T. Seasonal ocurrence of Musca domestica and other flies in relation to their pupae parasites in manure in and around Bangalore. In: Proceedings of a Symposium on the Ecology of Annual Populations Zoological Survey of India. 133-141. 1982. BAY, D.E.; PITTS, C.W. & WARD, G.M. Oviposition and development of the face fly in feces of six species of Animals. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 1733-5. 1968. 58. BAY, D.E.; PITTS, C.W. & WARD, G.M. Influence of moisture content of bovine feces on oviposition and development of the face fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 62(1): 41-44. 1969. BAY, D.E.; PITTS, C.W. & WARD, G.M. Face fly larval development in relation to bovine sex and quantity of feces. J. Econ. Entomol. 63: 1973. 1970. BEARD, R.L. & SANDS, D.C. Factors affecting degradation of poultry manure by flies. Environ. Entomol., 2(5): 801-806. 1973. BLUME, R.R. Insects associated with bovine dropping inkers and Bexar Couties, Texas. J. Econ. Entomol. 63: 1023-1024. 1970. CALVERT, C.C.; MORGAN, N.O. & MARTIN, R.D. House fly pupae as food for poultry. J. Econ. Entomol. 62: 938-9. 1969. D'AMATO, L.A.; KNAPP, F.W. & DAHLMAN, D.L. Survival of the face fly in feces from cattle fed alfafa hay or grain diets: Effect of fermentation and microbial changes. Environ. Entomol. 9: 557-560, 1980. ELTRINGHAN, M.A. Some experiments on the houve fly in relation to the farm manure heap. J. Agric. Sci. 7: 433-457. 1915. FIGG, D.E.; HALL, R.D. & THOMAS, G.D. Insect parasites associated with developing en bovine pats on central Missouri pastures. Environ. Entomol. 12(3): 961-966. 1983. 59. GEETHA BAI, M. & SANKARAN, T. Parasites, predators and other arthropods associated With M. domestica and other flies breding in bovine manure. Entomophaga. 22(2): 163-167. 1977. HAFEZ, M. Some ecological observation on the insect fauna of dung. Bull. Soc. Fouad. Ent. 23: 241-387. 1939. HAMMER, O. Biological and ecological investigations of flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement. Vidensk. Medd. Naturhist. Foren. Kobenhaun. 105: 141-393. 1941. JOSEPH, A.N.T. & PAURI, P. Filth inhabitinf flies (Díptera of Calcutta City. Bull. Zool. Surv. India. 3(1/2): 1-12, 1982. KARPENKO, L.V. The effect of mountaning the larvae of M. domestica on different substrates on its development and on the condition of the fat body. Vestn. Zool. 3: 73-79. 1975. LEGNER, E.F. & OLTON, G.S. Filth fly sources in decaying melon fields in southern California's low deserts. Calif. Agric. 29(12): 10-11. 1975. LEIKINA, L.I. The role of different substrates on the breeding of M. domestica. Med. Parasitol. 11: 82-86. 1942. L'VCHIEV, V.I. & TSANKOVA, R.N. Ecological investigations on coprobiontic Diptera in dunghills in the Sofia region. Ekol. Bulg. 7: 3-14. 1980. 60. MATTHIENSSEN, J.N.; HAYLES, L. & PALMER, M.J. As assessment of some methods for the bioassay of changes in cattle ding as insect food, using the bush fly. M. vetustissima Walker (Díptera: Muscidae). Bull. Entomol . Res.74(3): 463-467 1984. MEYER, J.A.; CHRISTENSEN, C.M. & KNAPP, F.W. The influence of time of day, bovine manure type and distance from a barn on the recovery of face and house fly pupal. Environ. Entomol. 7: 246-8, 1978. MEYER, J.A.; CHRISTENSEN, C.M. & KNAPP, F.W. The influence of various levels of ground ear corn and alfalfa hay in the bovine diet on the development of face fly. Environ. Entomol. 7: 829-30, 1978. MILLER, B.F. & SHAW, J.H. Digestion of poultry manure by Diptera. Poult. Sei. 48: 1844, 1969. MILLER, B.F.; TEOTIA, J.S. & THATCHER, T.O. Digestion of poultry manure by M. domestica. Brit. Poult. Sei. 15(2): 231-234. 1974. POORBAUGH, J.H.; ANDERSON, J.R. & BURGER, J.F. The insects inhabitants of undisturbed catlle droppings in Northern California. Calif. Vector Views. 15: 17-35. 1968. PUTMAN, R.J. Carrion and Dung. The Decomposition of Animal Wastes. Studies in Biology. 156:59 pp. 1983. RABARI, P.M. & PATEL, R.C. House fly breeding intensity in various media during different seasons: a study around Anand 61. Campus. Gujarat Agricultural University. Res. J. 2(2): 87-91. 1977. RABARI, P.M. & PATEL, R.C. Breding of house fly M. domestica L. in different media in rural areas. Indian J. Ent. 39(2): 186- 188. 1977. SANDERS, D.P. & DOBSON, R.L. The insect complex associated with bovine manure in Indiana. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 59: 955-959. 1966. SNOWBALL, G.J. A consideration of the insect populations associated with cow dung at Crawley. W.A.J.R. Soc. West. Aust. 28: 219- 245. 1944. SYCHEVSKAYA, V.I. [Pasture flies (Diptera) of Uzbekistan]. Ent. Obozr. 56(1): 79-87. 1977. TEOTIA, J.S. & MILLER, B.F. Environmental conditions affecting development of house fly larvae in poultry man0ure. Environ. Entomol. 2(3): 329-333. TESKY, H.J. A review of the life history and habits of Musca autumnalis De Geer. (Diptera, Muscidae). Can. Entomol. 92: 360- 7. 1960. TREECE, R.E. Effect of bovine diet on face fly development. A preliminary report. 3. Econ. Entomol. 59: 153-156. 1966. VALIELA, I. The arthropod faune of bovine dung in central New York and sources on its natural history. J. N. Y. Ent. Soe. 77: 210-220. 1969. 62. WEST, L.S. The housefly its natural history, medical importance and control. Comstock Publishing Company. Ithaca. Nova York. 584 p. 1951. WINGO, C.W.; THOMAS, G.D.; CLARD, G.N. & MORGAN, C.E. Succession and abundance of insects in pasture manure relationship to face fly survied. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 67: 386-90, 1974. ZVEREVA, E.L. Poultry droppings as habitat for coprobiont flies. Ent. Obozr. 61(3): 485-90. 1982.por
dc.subject.cnpqMedicina Veterináriapor
dc.thumbnail.urlhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/62798/1987%20-%20M%c3%a1rcia%20%20de%20Senna%20%20Nunes.pdf.jpg*
dc.originais.urihttps://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/4089
dc.originais.provenanceSubmitted by Celso Magalhaes (celsomagalhaes@ufrrj.br) on 2020-10-27T13:02:44Z No. of bitstreams: 1 1987 - Márcia de Senna Nunes.pdf: 523613 bytes, checksum: b79d1aea55ad6c6dd45bf017b090965c (MD5)eng
dc.originais.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-10-27T13:02:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 1987 - Márcia de Senna Nunes.pdf: 523613 bytes, checksum: b79d1aea55ad6c6dd45bf017b090965c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-06-02eng
Appears in Collections:Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias

Se for cadastrado no RIMA, poderá receber informações por email.
Se ainda não tem uma conta, cadastre-se aqui!

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1987 - Márcia de Senna Nunes.pdfMárcia de Senna Nunes511.34 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.